Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Complementary Medicine and Evidence-Based Practice

Power and Control in Healthcare — Questions About an Arranged Marriage

  • Current Opinion
  • Published:
Evidence-Based Integrative Medicine

Abstract

Healthcare is changing as evidence-based medicine (EBM) is incorporated into education and practice. This article considers the hierarchy of evidence, the validation of evidence for decision making and the extent to which this includes aspects of cultural and social constructs of health. We review the influence and the methodology of EBM as it is applied to complementary and alternative medicine (CAM), and suggest that there is an uneasy relationship as the two approaches to health have divergent understandings of health and evidence. There are fundamental philosophical and epistemological differences between orthodox and complementary medicine and we suggest that EBM is limited in how it can be applied to CAM. We question how the two approaches to healthcare can work together to create optimal outcomes in practice.

The movement towards evidence-based practice underscores the division between biomedicine and CAM. Historically, there has been little scientific research into CAM, largely because of its place as a ‘fringe’ profession. Most research is funded by private sector interests who might see the economic benefit of a certain procedure or product. The research culture that has developed has been one that emphasises an evidence-based approach to establishing the efficacy of single herbs and nutrients, which overlooks the way that complementary therapists use these substances. The review concludes with a concern that the relationship between EBM and complementary medicine may become unbalanced, and the proponents of one system ignore or dismiss the values of the other. This lack of cross-paradigmatic respect is the wellspring for division and suspicion that is currently permeating the arranged marriage between CAM and EBM.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Table I

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Strauss S. What’s the E for EBM? BMJ 2004 Mar 6; 328(7439): 535–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Sackett DL, Richardson WS, Rosenberg WM, et al. Evidence-based medicine. London: Churchill Livingstone, 1997: 2

    Google Scholar 

  3. Charlton BG, Miles A. The rise and fall of EBM. QJM 1998; 91(5): 371–4

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Clarke JB. Evidence-based practice: a retrograde step? The importance of pluralism in evidence generation for the practice of healthcare. J Clin Nurs 1999; 8(1): 84–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC). A guide to the development, implementation and evaluation of clinical practice guidelines. Canberra (ACT): NHMRC Publications, 1998: 8 [online]. Available from URL: http://www.csp.nsw.gov.au/nhmrc/downloads/pdfs/NHMRC%20Clinical%20Practice.pdf [Accessed 2006 Apr 12]

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gupta MA. Critical appraisal of evidence-based medicine: some ethical considerations. J Eval Clin Pract 2003; 9(2): 111–21

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Tonelli MR, Callahan TC. Why alternative medicine cannot be evidence-based. Acad Med 2001; 76(12): 1213–20

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Willis E, White K. Evidence-based medicine and CAM. In: Tovey P, Easthope G, Adams J, editors. The mainstreaming of complementary and alternative medicine. London: Routledge, 2004: 50

    Google Scholar 

  9. White K, Willis E. Positivism resurgent: the epistemological foundations of evidence-based medicine. Health Soc Rev 2002; 11(1 & 2): 5–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Richardson J. Evidence-based complementary medicine: rigor, relevance and the swampy lowlands. J Altern Complement Med 2002; 8(3): 221–3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. MacLennan AH, Wilson DH, Taylor AW. The escalating cost and prevalence of alternative medicine. Prev Med 2002; 35(2): 166–73

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Eisenberg DM, Kessler RC, Van Rompay MI, et al. Perceptions about complementary therapies relative to conventional therapies among adults who use both: results from a national survey. Ann Intern Med 2001; 135(5): 344–51

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Bensoussan A, Lewith GT. Complementary medicine research in Australia: a strategy for the future. Med J Aust 2004; 181: 331–3

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Myers SP, Hunter A, Snider P, et al. Naturopathic medicine. In: Robson T, editor. An introduction to complementary medicine. Sydney: Allen & Unwin, 2003: 48–66

    Google Scholar 

  15. Verhoef M, Casebeer AL, Hilsden RJ. Assessing efficacy of complementary medicine: adding qualitative research to the gold standard. J Altern Complement Med 2002; 8(3): 275–81

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Wilson K, Mills EJ, for the Evidence-based Complementary Medicine Group. Introducing evidence-based alternative and complementary medicine: answering the challenge. J Altern Complement Med 2002; 8(2): 103–5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Delbanco T. Leeches, spiders, and astrology: predilections and predictions. JAMA 1998; 280(18): 1560–2

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Pelletier K. Mind as healer, mind as slayer: MindBody medicine comes of age. Adv Mind Body Med 2002; 18(1): 4–14

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Mills EJ, Hollyer T, Guyatt G, et al. Teaching evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine: 1. A learning structure for clinical decision changes. J Altern Complement Med 2002; 8(2): 207–14

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Brody H, Rygwelski JM, Fetters MD. Ethics at the interface of conventional and complementary medicine. In: Jonas WEB, Levin JS, editors. The essentials of complementary and alternative medicine. Philadelphia (PA): Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, 1999: 46–56

    Google Scholar 

  21. Thorne S, Best A, Balon J, et al. Ethical dimensions in the borderland between conventional and complementary/alternative medicine. J Alt Complement Med 2002; 8(6): 907–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wharton JC. The history of complementary and alternative medicine. In: Jonas WEB, Levin JS, editors. The essentials of complementary and alternative medicine. Philadelphia (PA): Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, 1999: 16–30

    Google Scholar 

  23. Feinstein AR, Horowitz MD. Problems in the ‘evidence’ of evidence-based medicine. Am J Med 1997; 103: 529–35

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Kleinman A. The illness narratives: suffering, healing and the human condition. New York: Basic Books, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  25. Fontarosa P, Lundberg G. Alternative medicine meets science. JAMA 1998; 280(18): 1618–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Sigerist HE. A history of medicine. Vol. 1. Primitive and archaic medicine. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  27. Lewith G, Jonas WB, Walach H, editors. Clinical research in complementary therapies principles, problems and solutions. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 2002: 4

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

No sources of funding were obtained for the preparation of this article. Neither author has any conflict of interest relevant to the contents of the review.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Australian Centre for Complementary Medicine Education and Research (ACCMER), a joint venture of the University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

    Assunta Hunter & Airdre Grant

Authors
  1. Assunta Hunter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Airdre Grant
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Airdre Grant.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hunter, A., Grant, A. Complementary Medicine and Evidence-Based Practice. Evid-Based-Integrative-Med 2, 189–194 (2005). https://doi.org/10.2165/01197065-200502040-00002

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/01197065-200502040-00002

Keywords

Search

Navigation