CNS Drugs

, Volume 7, Issue 5, pp 341–346

What Makes an Antipsychotic ‘Atypical’?

Conserving the Definition
  • John L. Waddington
  • Eadbhard O’Callaghan
Leading Article

DOI: 10.2165/00023210-199707050-00001

Cite this article as:
Waddington, J.L. & O’Callaghan, E. CNS Drugs (1997) 7: 341. doi:10.2165/00023210-199707050-00001

Summary

Current usage of the term ‘atypical’ in relation to antipsychotics lacks clear theoretical underpinnings and rigour in application. The prevailing definition of atypicality is a reduced liability to induce extrapyramidal side effects (EPS). However, this definition appears incomplete in the face of numerous other limitations associated with antipsychotics that can impact adversely on patient well-being; these encompass issues of efficacy, non-motoric physiology and quality of life.

On this basis, more conservative, operationalised criteria for atypical antipsychotic activity can be offered and applied to representative classical versus more recently introduced antipsychotics. These criteria include a reduced liability to induce EPS, but also superior efficacy, efficacy in patients who do not respond to classical antipsychotics, and no induction of subjective dysphoria, sedation, autonomic/cardiac effects, sexual dysfunction and bodyweight gain, and no elevation of prolactin levels or other endocrine effects. Such criteria codify yet higher aspirations for treatment with the welcome array of newer agents that is currently emerging.

Copyright information

© Adis International Limited 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • John L. Waddington
    • 1
  • Eadbhard O’Callaghan
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Clinical PharmacologyRoyal College of Surgeons in IrelandDublin 2Ireland
  2. 2.Cluain Mhuire Family CentreDublinIreland