Discrete choice experiment to derive willingness to pay for methyl aminolevulinate photodynamic therapy versus simple excision surgery in basal cell carcinoma
Purchase on Springer.com
$49.95 / €39.95 / £34.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
Objectives: This study aimed to determine willingness to pay (WTP) and preference for methyl aminolevulinate (MAL) photodynamic therapy compared with simple surgical excision for basal cell carcinoma (BCC). The relative preferences for individual features of the therapy were also determined.
Design: A discrete-choice experiment was conducted to ascertain WTP and relative preferences for treatment of BCC among the general population.
Subjects and methods: Sixty members of the general public (34 men, 26 women; mean age 50 ± 13 years) completed a written questionnaire. Participants indicated their preference between 12 pairs of scenarios representing BCC treatment. The paired scenarios comprised a fixed scenario representing current standard treatment (simple surgical excision) and an alternative scenario. Scenarios comprised five attributes: lesion response rate, risk of scarring, treatment description, possibility of infection and cost. Clinical attributes and levels were derived from clinical trial data. WTP values were in Australian dollars ($A, year 2001 values) and the study was conducted from the societal perspective.
Results: The probability that MAL photodynamic therapy with topical anaesthesia would be accepted in preference to current treatment was 0.879, if there was no cost differential. Total incremental WTP was $A940 for MAL photodynamic therapy. The primary driver of total WTP was reduced risk of scarring, which contributed $A554, but treatment description and infection rate also made significant positive contributions. By contrast, the marginally higher lesion response rate with simple surgical excision (93%) compared with MAL photodynamic therapy (84%) did not significantly reduce WTP. Demographic factors had negligible influence upon the results. Sensitivity analyses indicated that incremental WTP for MAL photodynamic therapy was strongly influenced by the presence of anaesthetic.
Conclusion: There appears to be a sizeable incremental WTP for MAL photodynamic therapy with anaesthetic for the treatment of BCC relative to simple surgical excision, and this is largely driven by better cosmetic outcomes.
- Raasch B. Suspicious skin lesions and their management. Aust Fam Physician 1999; 28: 466–71
- Medicare Benefits Schedule item statistics. 1999–2000 [online]. Available from URL: http://www.hic.gov.au/statistics/ dyn mbs/forms/mbs tab4.shtml [Accessed 2001]
- Rhodes LE, De Rie M, Enström Y, et al. Photodynamic therapy using topical methyl aminolevulinate vs surgery for treatment of primary nodular basal cell carcinoma: results of a randomized prospective trial. Archives of Dermatology 2004; 140 (1): 17–23 CrossRef
- Metvix® (methylaminolevulinate photodynamic therapy) product information. Oslo: PhotoCure ASA, 2001
- Myers RH, Montgomery DC. Response surface methodology: process and product optimization using designed experiments. New York: Wiley, 1995
- Kuhfeld WF, Tobias RD, Garratt M. Efficient experimental designs with marketing research applications. J Mark Res 1994; 31: 545–57 CrossRef
- Jan S, Mooney G, Ryan M, et al. The use of conjoint analysis to elicit community preferences in public health research: a case study of hospital services in South Australia. Aust N Z J Public Health 2000; 24: 64–70 CrossRef
- Ryan M, Farrar S. Using conjoint analysis to elicit preferences for health care. BMJ 2000; 320: 1530–2 CrossRef
- Liang K-Y, Zeger SL. Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika 1986; 73: 13–22 CrossRef
- Neuhaus JM. Statistical methods for longitudinal and clustered designs with binary responses. Stat Methods Med Res 1992; 1: 249–73 CrossRef
- Huber PJ. The behaviour of maximum likelihood estimates under non-standard conditions. Proceedings of the Fifth Berkeley Symposium in Mathematical Statistics and Probability; University of California Press, 1967, 221–3
- White H. A heteroskedasiticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasiticity. Econometrica 1980; 48: 819–930
- White H. Maximum likelihood estimation of mis-specified models. Econometrica 1982; 50: 1–25 CrossRef
- Efron B. Bootstrap methods: another look at the jack-knife. Ann Statist 1979; 7: 1–26 CrossRef
- StataCorp. Stata Statistical Software. College Station (TX): Stata Corporation, 6.0, 1999
- Kriström B, Laitila T. Stated preference methods for environmental valuation: a critical look. In: Folmer H, Tietenberg T, editors. International yearbook of environmental and resource economics. Cheltenham, UK: Edgar Elgar, 2003
- Discrete choice experiment to derive willingness to pay for methyl aminolevulinate photodynamic therapy versus simple excision surgery in basal cell carcinoma
Volume 22, Issue 18 , pp 1195-1208
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer International Publishing
- Additional Links
- Industry Sectors