Skip to main content
Log in

Less is More: Medicines that Require Less Frequent Administration Improve Adherence, but Are They Better?

  • Editorial
  • Published:
PharmacoEconomics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Urquhart J. The odds of the three nons when an aptly prescribed medicine isn’t working: non-compliance, non-absorption, nonresponse. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2002; 54: 212–220

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hughes DA, Bagust A, Haycox A, et al. The impact of noncompliance on the cost-effectiveness of pharmaceuticals: a review of the literature. Health Econ 2001; 10: 601–615

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Haynes RB, Yao X, Degani A, et al. Interventions to enhance medication adherence. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005 Oct 19; (4): CD0000ll

    Google Scholar 

  4. Elliott RA, Barber N, Horne R. Cost-effectiveness of adherence-enhancing interventions: a quality assessment of the evidence. Ann Pharmacother 2005; 39: 508–515

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Claxton AJ, Cramer JA, Pierce C. A systematic review of the association between dose regimens and medication compliance. Clin Ther 2001; 23: 1296–1310

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Cramer JA, Amonkar MM, Hebborn A, et al. Compliance and persistence with bisphosphonate dosing regimens among women with postmenopausal osteoporosis. Curr Med Res Opin 2005; 21: 1453–1460

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Richter A, Anton SE, Koch P, et al. The impact of reducing dose frequency on health outcomes. Clin Ther 2003; 25: 2307–2335

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Miller PD, McClung MR, Macovei L, et al. Monthly oral ibandronate therapy in postmenopausal osteoporosis: 1-year results from the MOBILE study. J Bone Miner Res 2005; 20: 1315–1322

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Trussell J. Contraceptive efficacy. In: Hatcher RA, Trussell J, Stewart F, et al., editors. Contraceptive technology. 18th ed. New York: Ardent Media, 2004

    Google Scholar 

  10. National Collaborating Centre for Women’s and Children’s Health. Long-acting reversible contraception: the effective and appropriate use of long-term reversible contraception. London: RCOG Press, 2005

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ome P, Eerdekens M, Augustyns I, et al. Comparative efficacy and safety of long-acting risperidone and risperidone oral tablets. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 2005; 15: 111–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Joint Formulary Committee. British national formulary. 50th ed. London: British Medical Association and Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain, 2005 [online]. Available from URL: http://www.bnf.org/bnf/ [Accessed 2006 Jan 23]

    Google Scholar 

  13. Haycox A. Pharmacoeconomics of long-acting risperidone: results and validity of cost-effectiveness models. Pharmacoeconomics 2005; 23 Suppl. 1: 3–16

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Wetzels GE, Nelemans P, Schouten JS, et al. Facts and fiction of poor compliance as a cause of inadequate blood pressure control: a systematic review. J Hypertens 2004; 22: 1849–1855

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Granger BB, Swedberg K, Ekman I, et al. Adherence to candesartan and placebo and outcomes in chronic heart failure in the CHARM programme: double-blind, randomised, controlled clinical trial. Lancet 2005; 366: 2005–2011

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Urquhart J. Pharmacodynamics of variable patient compliance: implications for pharmaceutical value. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 1998; 33: 207–219

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Summary of product characteristics: Bonviva 150mg film-coated tablets. Welwyn Garden City: Roche Products Limited, 2005 [online]. Available from URL: http://emc.medicines.org.uk/ [Accessed 2006 Jan 23]

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author has received research funding from Janssen Pharmaceutica, manufacturers of risperidone. No sources of funding were used to assist in the preparation of this editorial. The author has no conflicts of interest relevant to this editorial.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dyfrig Hughes.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hughes, D. Less is More: Medicines that Require Less Frequent Administration Improve Adherence, but Are They Better?. Pharmacoeconomics 24, 211–213 (2006). https://doi.org/10.2165/00019053-200624030-00001

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00019053-200624030-00001

Navigation