Skip to main content
Log in

Mechanisms of Resistance to Fluoroquinolones: State-of-the-Art 1992–1994

  • State-Of-The-Art Presentations
  • Published:
Drugs Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

This paper gives an update on the mechanisms of bacterial resistance to fluoroquinolones. The laboratory techniques currently used to determine the mechanism(s) of resistance are outlined, including the use of restriction fragment length polymorphism and single-stranded conformational polymorphism analysis of mutations in gyrA. Alterations in gyrA have continued to be the most reported cause of resistance, with high level resistance due to 2 or more mutations in this gene. Recently, mutations in gyrA of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Campylobacter jejuni have been described. Complementation studies with plasmid encoded cloned gyrB from Escherichia coli suggest that high fluoroquinolone resistance (minimum inhibitory concentration = 32 mg/L) in Salmonella typhimurium can be due to mutation in both gyrA and gyrB.

Decreased fluoroquinolone accumulation into E. coli has been shown to be due to mutations in a number of genes at different loci. Current interest has focused upon the marRAB and soxRS loci, with mutations in genes of either loci giving rise to decreased susceptibility to several unrelated drugs, including fluoroquinolones, tetracycline, chloramphenicol and some β-lactams, and decreased expression of OmpF. The genetic characterisation of fluoroquinolone efflux from Staphylococcus aureus has shown that efflux occurs in both fluoroquinolone-susceptible and -resistant bacteria. The most likely cause of resistance is overexpression of NorA, giving rise to increased efflux. Recently, 2 efflux systems in Pseudomonas aeruginosa have been proposed, MexA-MexB-OprK and MexC-MexD-OprM, conferring decreased susceptibility to fluoroquinolones, tetracycline, chloramphenicol and some β-lactams.

To date, most clinical fluoroquinolone resistance has been due to mutations in gyr A; however, with the continued increase in the use of these agents bacteria will continue to employ different tactics to evade their action. It is likely that high level fluoroquinolone resistance will emerge in previously susceptible species because of several mutations in one or several genes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Piddock LJV. Resistance to quinolones and fluoroquinolones. In: Bryan LE, editor. Handbook of experimental pharmacology: microbial resistance to drugs. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, Chapter 8, 1989: 169-92

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cambau E, Gutmann L. Mechanisms of resistance to quinolones. Drugs 1993; 45 Suppl. 3: 15–23

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Robillard N. Broad host range gyrase A gene probe. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1990; 34: 1889–94

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Heisig P, Wiedemann B. Use of a broad-host-range gyrA plasmid for genetic characterisation of fluoroquinolone-resistant Gram-negative bacteria. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1991; 35: 2031–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Heisig P, Tschorny R. Characterisation of fluoroquinolone-resistant mutants of Escherichia coli selected in vitro. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1994; 38: 1284–91

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Tokue Y, Sugano K, Saito D, et al. Detection of novel mutations in gyrA gene of Staphylococcus aureus by nonadioisotopic single-strand conformation polymorphism analysis and direct DNA sequencing. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1994; 38: 310–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Takiff HE, Salazar L, Guerrero C, et al. Cloning and nucleotide sequence of M. tuberculosis gyrA and gytrB genes and detection of quinolone resistance mutations. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1994; 38: 773–80

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Wang Y, Huang WM, Taylor DE. Cloning and nucleotide sequence of the Campylobacter jejuni gyrA gene and characterisation of quinolone resistance mutations. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1993; 37: 457–63

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Cullen ME, Wyke AW, Kuroda R, et al. Cloning and characterisation of a DNA gyrase A gene from Escherichia coli that confers clinical resistance to 4-quinolones. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1989; 33: 886–94

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Yamagishi J, Yoshida H, Yamayichi M, et al. Nalidixic acid-resistant mutations of the gyrB gene of Escherichia coli. Mol Gen Genet 1986; 204: 367–73

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Heisig P. High-level fluoroquinolone resistance in a Salmonella typhimurium isolate due to alterations in both gyrA and gyrB genes. J Antimicrob Chemother 1994; 32: 367–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Piddock LJV. Mechanism of quinolone uptake into bacterial cells. J Antimicrob Chemother 1991; 27: 399–405

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hirai K, Aoyama H, Suzue S, et al. Isolation and characterisation of norfloxacin-resistant mutants of Escherichia coli K-12. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1986; 30: 248–53

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hooper D, Wolfson J, Souza KS, et al. Genetic and biochemical characterisation of norfloxacin resistance in Escherichia coli. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1986; 29: 638–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Greenberg JT, Chou JH, Monach PA, et al. Activation of oxidative stress genes by mutations at the soxQ/cfxB/marA locus of Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 1991; 173: 433–9

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hooper DC, Wolfson JS, Souza KS, et al. Mechanisms of quinolone resistance in Escherichia coli: characterisation of nfxB and cfxB, two mutant resistance loci decreasing norfloxacin accumulation. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1989; 33: 283–90

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Hrebenda J, Heleszko H, Brostek K, et al. Mutation affecting resistance of Escherichia coli K12 to nalidixic acid. J Gen Microbiol 1985; 131: 2285–92

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Miller PF, Gambino LF, Sulvik MC, et al. Genetic relationship between soxRS and mar loci in promoting multiple antibiotic resistance in Escherichia coli. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1994; 38: 1773–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Ariza RR, Cohen SP, Bachhawat N, et al. Repressor mutations in the maRAB operon that activate oxidative stress genes and multiple antibiotic resistance in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 1994; 176: 143–48

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Cohen SP, Hooper DC, Wolfson JS, et al. Endogenous active efflux of norfloxacin in susceptible E. coli. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1988; 32: 1187–91

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Yoshida H, Bogaki M, Nakamura S, et al. Nucleotide sequence and characterisation of the Staphylococcus aureus norA gene, which confers resistance to quinolones. J Bacteriol 1990; 172: 6942–9

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Yoshida H, Kojima T, Inoue M, et al. Uptake of sparfloxacin and norfloxacin by clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1991; 35: 368–70

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Oshita Y, Hiramatsu K, Yokota T. A point mutation in the norA gene is responsible for quinolone resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1990; 172: 1028–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kaatz GW, Seo SM, Ruble CA. Efflux mediated fluoroquinolone resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1993; 37: 1086–94

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Poole K, Krebes K, McNally K, et al. Multiple antibiotic resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: evidence for involvement of an efflux operon. J Bacteriol 1993; 175: 7363–72

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Li X-Z, Livermore DM, Nikaido H. Role of efflux pump(s) in intrinsic resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa: resistance to tetracycline, chloramphenicol and norfloxacin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1994; 38: 1732–41

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Nakashini N, Yoshida S, Wakebe H, et al. Mechanisms and clinical resistance to fluoroquinolones in Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1991; 35: 2562–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Piddock, L.J.V. Mechanisms of Resistance to Fluoroquinolones: State-of-the-Art 1992–1994. Drugs 49 (Suppl 2), 29–35 (1995). https://doi.org/10.2165/00003495-199500492-00006

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00003495-199500492-00006

Keywords

Navigation