Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Treatment Strategies in Elderly Patients with Multiple Myeloma

Current Status

  • Therapy In Practice
  • Published:
Drugs & Aging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Multiple myeloma (MM), a plasma cell malignancy, is a disorder of the elderly with an increasing prevalence as the average life expectancy increases. Survival remains unacceptably low in elderly patients with MM, in whom the gold standard of treatment has been, until recently, oral melphalan and prednisolone, which induces a response rate of approximately 50% and overall survival of <3 years. In the last 15 years, traditional treatment paradigms for elderly patients with MM have been challenged not only as a result of the change in what we define as ‘elderly’ but also as a result of the reduced morbidity and treatment-related mortality associated with high-dose chemoradiotherapy (HDT) and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT), and the emergence of novel therapies including thalidomide, its immunomodulator drug derivative lenalidomide and the first-in-class proteasome inhibitor, bortezomib. In this review, we examine currently available data regarding the treatment of MM in the elderly population. Recent years have seen a paradigm shift in the standard of care of elderly patients with MM from oral melphalan and prednisolone to approaches including HDT with ASCT using intermediate-dose melphalan in selected elderly patients, and the evaluation of and incorporation of drugs such as thalidomide, bortezomib and lenalidomide. Importantly, we now have been able to change the traditional goal of palliation in the elderly group of patients to a more ambitious objective of achieving a complete response or a near complete response, in the hope that this will translate into improved progression-free survival, overall survival and quality of life.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Table I
Fig. 1
Table II
Table III

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hideshima T, Bergsagel PL, Kueh WM, et al. Advances in biology of multiple myeloma: clinical applications. Blood 2004; 104: 607–18

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ries LAG, Harkins D, Krapcho M, et al. SEER cancer statistic review [online]. Available from URL: http://www.seer.cancer.gov [Accessed 2006 Nov 25]

  3. American Cancer Society [online]. Available from URL: http://www.cancer.org [Accessed 2007 Jul 25]

  4. Morton ML, Wang SS, Devesa SS, et al. Lymphoma incidence patterns by WHO subtype in the United States, 1992–2001. Blood 2006; 107(1): 265–75

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Jantunen E. Autologous stem cell transplantation beyond 60 years of age. Bone Marrow Transplant 2006; 38: 1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Penson TR, Daniels JK, Lynch Jr TJ. Too old to care? Oncologist 2004; 9: 343–52

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Blade J, Munoz M, Fontanillas M, et al. Treatment of multiple myeloma in the elderly people: long-term results in 178 patients. Age Ageing 1996; 25: 357–61

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Clavio M, Casciaro S, Gatti A, et al. Multiple myeloma in the elderly: clinical features and response to treatment in 113 patients. Haematologica 1996; 81: 238–44

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Corso A, Klersy C, Lazzarino M, et al. Multiple myeloma in younger patients: the role of age as prognostic factor. Ann Hematol 1998; 76: 67–72

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Mileshkin L, Prince M. The adverse prognostic impact of advance age in multiple myeloma. Leuk Lymphoma 2005; 46(7): 951–66

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Froom P, Quitt M, Aghai E. Multiple myeloma in the geriatric patient. Cancer 1990; 66: 965–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Cohen HJ, Bartoloucci A. Age and the treatment of multiple myeloma: South Eastern Cancer Study Group experience. Am J Med 1985; 79: 316–24

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Anagnostopoulos A, Gika D, Symeonidis A, et al. Multiple myeloma in elderly patients: prognostic factors and outcome. Eur J Haematol 2005; 75: 370–5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Palva IP, Ahrenberg P, Ala-Harja K, et al. Treatment of multiple myeloma in old patients. Eur J Haematol 1989; 43: 328–31

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Smith A, Wisloff F, Samson D. Guidelines on the diagnosis and management of multiple myeloma 2005. Br J Haematol 2005; 132: 410–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Dimopoulos MA, Moulopoulos A, Smith T, et al. Risk of disease progression in asymptomatic multiple myeloma. Am J Med 1993; 94: 57–61

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kyle RA, Rajkumar S. Drug therapy: multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med 2004; 351(18): 1860–73

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Durie BG, Katz MS. Interactive computer program reveals current disease features and patterns of myeloma management [abstract]. Hematol J 2003; 4Suppl. 1: S181

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hjorth M, Hellquist L, Holmberg E, et al. Initial versus deferred melphalan-prednisolone therapy for asymptomatic multiple myeloma stage I: a randomised study. Eur J Haematol 1993; 50: 95–102

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Riccardi A, Mora O, Tinelli C, et al. Long term survival of stage I multiple myeloma given chemotherapy just after diagnosis or at progression of the disease: a multicenter randomised study. Cooperative Group Study and Treatment of Multiple Myeloma. Br J Cancer 2003; 82: 1254–60

    Google Scholar 

  21. Harousseau JL, Attal M. High dose therapy in multiple myeloma. Hematol J 2003; 4: 163–70

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Barlogie B, Jagannath S, Kesikan KR, et al. Total therapy with tandem transplants for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Blood 1999; 93: 55–65

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Davies FE, Forsyth PD, Rawstron AC, et al. The impact of attaining a minimal disease state after high-dose melphalan and autologous transplantation for multiple myeloma. Br J Haematol 2001; 112: 814–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Lahuerta JJ, Marinez-lopez J, De La Serna J, et al. Remission status defined by immunofixation vs electrophoresis after autologous transplantation has a major impact on outcome for multiple myeloma patients. Br J Haematol 2002; 109: 438–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Attal M, Harousseau JL, Stoppa AM, et al. A prospective, randomised trial of autologous bone marrow transplantation and chemotherapy in multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med 1996; 335: 91–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Child AJ, Gareth JM, Faith ED, et al. High-dose chemotherapy with hematopoietic stem-rescue for multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med 2003; 348(19): 1875–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Levy V, Katsahian S, Fernand JP, et al. A meta-analysis on data from 575 patients with multiple myeloma randomly assigned to either high-dose therapy or conventional therapy. Medicine 2005; 84(4): 250–60

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Fernand J, Katsahian S, Marine D, et al. High-dose therapy and autologous blood stem-cell transplantation compared with conventional treatment in myeloma patients aged 55 to 65 years: long term results of a randomized control trial from the Group Myelome-Autogreffe. J Clin Oncol 2005; 36: 9227–33

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Palumbo A, Triolo S, Argentino C, et al. Dose intensive melphalan with stem cell support (MEL100) is superior to standard treatment in elderly myeloma patients. Blood 1999; 94: 1248–53

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Sirohi B, Powles R, Treleaven J, et al. The role of autologous transplantation in patients with multiple myeloma aged 65 years and over. Bone Marrow Transplant 2000; 25: 533–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Guba SC, Vesole DH, Jagannath S, et al. Peripheral stem cell mobilization and engraftment in patients over 60 years of age. Bone Marrow Transplant 1997; 20: 1–3

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Jantunen E, Kuittinen T, Penttila K, et al. High-dose melphalan (200mg/m2) supported by autologous stem cell transplantation is safe and effective in elderly (≥65 years) myeloma patients: comparison with younger patients treated within same protocol. Bone Marrow Transplant 2006; 37: 917–22

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Mileshkin LR, Seymour JF, Wolf M, et al. Cardiovascular toxicity is increased, but manageable during high-dose chemotherapy and autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation for patients aged 60 years and older. Leuk Lymphoma 2005; 46(11): 1575–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Badros A, Barglogie B, Seigel E, et al. Autologous stem cell transplantation in elderly multiple myeloma patients over the age of 70 years. Br J Haematol 2001; 114: 600–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Prince HM, Imrie K, Stewart AK, et al. Peripheral blood progenitor cell collections in multiple myeloma: predictors and management of inadequate collections. Br J Haematol 1996; 93: 142–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Tricot G, Jagannath S, Vesole D, et al. Peripheral blood stem cell transplants for multiple myeloma: identification of favourable variables for rapid engraftment in 225 patients. Blood 1995; 85: 588–96

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Scheid C, Draube A, Reiser M, et al. Using at least 5×106/kg CD34+ cells for autologous stem cell transplantation significantly reduces febrile complications and the use of antibiotics after transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant 1999; 23: 1177–81

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Palumbo A, Bringhen S, Petrucci TM, et al. Intermediate-dose melphalan improves survival of myeloma patients aged 50 to 70: results of a randomized control trial. Blood 2004; 104: 3052–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Alexanian R, Dimopoulos MA, Delasalle K, et al. Primary dexamethasone treatment of multiple myeloma. Blood 1992; 80: 887–90

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Cavo M, Zamagni E, Tosi P, et al. First line therapy with thalidomide and dexamethasone in preparation for autologous stem cell transplantation for multiple myeloma. Haematologica 2004; 89: 826–31

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Cavo M, Zamagni E, Tosii P, et al. Superiority of thalidomide and dexamethasone over vincristine doxorubicin-dex-amethasone (VAD) as primary therapy in preparation for autologous transplantation for multiple myeloma. Blood 2005; 106: 35–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Richardson P, Anderson K. Thalidomide and dexamethasone: a new standard of care for initial therapy in multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol 2006; 24: 334–6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Barlogie B, Tricot G, Anaissie E, et al. Thalidomide and hematopoietic-cell transplantation for multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med 2006; 354: 1021–30

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. The Myeloma Trialists’ Collaborative Group. Combination chemotherapy versus melphalan plus prednisolone as treatment for multiple myeloma: an overview of 6,633 patients from 27 randomized trials. J Clin Oncol 1998; 16: 3832–42

    Google Scholar 

  45. Belch A, Shelley W, Bergsagel D, et al. A randomized trial of maintenance vs no maintenance melphalan and prednisolone in responding multiple myeloma patients. Br J Cancer 1988; 57: 94–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Carlson K, Martin J, Knudsen L. Toxicity in standard melphalan-prednisolone therapy among myeloma patients with renal failure: a retrospective analysis and recommendations for dose adjustments. Br J Haematol 2005; 128: 631–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Boccadoro M, Marmont F, Tribalto M, et al. Multiple myeloma: VMCP/VBAP alternating combination chemotherapy is not superior to melphalan and prednisolone even in high risk patients. J Clin Oncol 1991; 9: 444–8

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Turk BE, Jiang H, Lie JO. Binding of thalidomide to alpha-1-acid-glycoprotein may be involved in its inhibition of tumour necrosis factor alpha production. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1996; 93: 7552–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Hideshima T, Chauhan D, Sima Y, et al. Thalidomide and its analogues overcome drug resistance of multiple myeloma cells to conventional therapy. Blood 2000; 96(9): 2943–50

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Rajkumar S, Dispenzieri A, Fonseca R, et al. Thalidomide for previously untreated indolent or smouldering multiple myeloma. Leukemia 2001; 15: 1274–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Rajkumar V, Hayman S, Gertz A, et al. Combination therapy with thalidomide plus dexamethasone for newly diagnosed myeloma. J Clin Oncol 2002; 20: 4319–23

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Rajkumar V, Blood E, Vesole D, et al. Phase III clinical trial of thalidomide plus dexamethasone compared with dexamethasone alone in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: a clinical trial coordinated by Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. J Clin Oncol 2006; 24: 431–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Dingli D, Rajkumar SV, Nowakowski G, et al. Combination therapy with thalidomide and dexamethasone in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma not undergoing autologous stem cell transplant: a phase II trial. Haematologica 2005; 90(12): 1650–4

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Weber D, Rankin K, Gavino M, et al. Thalidomide alone or with dexamethasone for previously untreated multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol 2003; 21: 16–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Offidani M, Corvatta L, Maria-Novella P, et al. Thalidomide, dexamethasone, and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (ThaDD) for patients older than 65 years with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Blood 2006; 108: 2159–64

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Palumbo A, Bringhen S, Caravito T, et al. Oral melphalan and prednisone chemotherapy plus thalidomide compared with melphalan and prednisone alone in elderly patients with multiple myeloma: randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2006; 367: 825–31

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Facon T, Mary JY, Harousseau J, et al. Superiority of melphalan-prednisolone (MP) + thalidomide (THAL) over MP and autologous stem cell transplantation in the treatment of newly diagnosed elderly patients with multiple myeloma: Intergroupe Fracophone du Myeloma [abstract]. J Clin Oncol 2006; 24(18S): 1

    Google Scholar 

  58. Barlogie B, Diskan R, Eddlemon P, et al. Extended survival in advanced and refractory multiple myeloma after single-agent thalidomide: identification of prognostic factors in a phase 2 study of 169 patients. Blood 2001; 98(2): 492–4

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Prince HM, Schenkel B, Mileshkin L. An analysis of clinical trials assessing the efficacy and safety of single agent thalidomide in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. Leuk Lymphoma 2007; 48(1): 46–55

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Glasmacher A, Hahn C, Hoffmann F, et al. A systematic review of phase II trials of thalidomide monotherapy in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. Br J Haematol 2005; 132: 584–93

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Kenealy M, Prince HM. Current status of new drugs for the treatment of patients with multiple myeloma. Int J Med 2006; 36: 1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Zangari M, Anaissie E, Barlogie B. Increased risk of deep-vein thrombosis in patients with multiple myeloma receiving thalidomide and chemotherapy. Blood 2001; 98: 1614–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Rajkumar S. Thalidomide therapy and deep venous thrombosis in myeloma. Mayo Clin Proc 2005; 80: 1564–74

    Google Scholar 

  64. Honemann D, Prince HM. Myeloma, thalidomide and thrombosis. Leuk Lymphoma 2006; 47(11): 2273–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Kumar S, Gertz MA, Dispenzieri A, et al. Response rate, durability of response and survival after thalidomide therapy for relapsed multiple myeloma. Mayo Clin Proc 2003; 78: 34–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Mileshkin L, Stark R, Day B, et al. Development of neuropathy in patients with myeloma treated with thalidomide: patterns of occurrence and the role of electrophysiologic monitoring. J Clin Oncol 2006; 27: 4507–14

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Richardson P, Schlossmann R, Jagannath S, et al. Thalidomide for patients with relapsed multiple myeloma after high-dose chemotherapy and stem cell transplantation: results of an open-label multicenter phase 2 study of efficacy, toxicity and biological activity. Mayo Clin Proc 2004; 79(7): 875–82

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Mileshkin L, Prince HM. The troublesome toxicity of peripheral neuropathy with thalidomide. Leuk Lymphoma 2006; 47(11): 2276–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Durie BG. Low-dose thalidomide in myeloma: efficacy and biologic significance. Semin Oncol 2002; 29(17S): 34–8

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Palumbo A, Giaccone L, Bertola A, et al. Low dose thalidomide plus dexamethasone is an effective salvage therapy for advanced myeloma. Haematologica 2001; 86: 399–403

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Zhou S, Kestell P, Tingle MD, et al. Thalidomide in cancer treatment: a potential role in the elderly? Drugs Aging 2002; 19(2): 85–100

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Fakhouri F, Guerraoui H, Presne C, et al. Thalidomide in patients with myeloma and renal failure. Br J Haematol 2004; 125: 96–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. Mazumder A, Jagannath S. Thalidomide and lenalidomide in multiple myeloma. Best Pract Res Clin Haematol 2006; 19(4): 769–80

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. Anderson KC. Novel immunomodulatory therapies in the treatment of multiple myeloma. Oncology 2004; 18: 988–90

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Richardson P, Mitsiades C, Hideshima T, et al. Lenalidomide in multiple myeloma. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2006; 6(8): 1165–73

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. Dimopoulous M, Bweber D, Chen C, et al. Evaluating oral lenalidomide and dexamethasone versus placebo and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma [abstract]. Haematologica 2005; 90Suppl. 2: 160

    Google Scholar 

  77. Rajkumar SV, Hayman SR, Martha Q, et al. Combination therapy with lenalidomide plus dexamethasone (Rev/Dex) for newly diagnosed myeloma. Blood 2005; 106: 4050–3

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  78. Weber D. Two phase III randomised double blind, placebo-controlled trials of lenalidomide-dexamethasone vs dexamethasone for refractory or relapsed multiple myeloma. Presented at a special session titled: ImiDs-results of phase III studies in relapsed/refractory myeloma [online]. Available from URL: http://www.ASCO.org [Accessed 2006 Nov 24]

  79. Knight R, Delap JR, Zeldis BJ. Lenalidomide and venous thrombosis in multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med 2006; 354(19): 2079–80

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  80. Rajkumar SV, Jacobus S, Callander N, et al. Phase III trial of lenalidomide plus high-dose dexamethasone versus lenalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (E4A03): a trial coordinated by the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group [abstract]. J Clin Oncol 2007; 25 (18 Suppl.): 8025a

    Google Scholar 

  81. Rajkumar SV. The role of lenalidomide in myeloma patients eligible for high dose therapy. Haematologica 2007; 92Suppl. 2: 30–1

    Google Scholar 

  82. Almond JB, Cohen GM. The proteasome: a novel target for cancer chemotherapy. Leukemia 2002; 16: 433–43

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  83. Hideshima T, Richardson P, Chauhan D, et al. The proteasome inhibitor PS-341 inhibits growth induces apoptosis, and over comes drug resistance in human multiple myeloma cells. Cancer Res 2001; 61: 3071–6

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  84. Jagannath S, Durie B, Wolf J, et al. Bortezomib therapy alone and in combination with dexamethasone for previously untreated symptomatic multiple myeloma. Br J Haematol 2005; 129: 776–83

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  85. Harousseau JL, Attal M, Leleu X, et al. Bortezomib plus dexamethasone as induction treatment prior to autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: results of an IFM phase II study. Haematologica 2006; 91: 1498–505

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  86. Oakervee HE, Popat R, Curry N, et al. PAD combination therapy (PS-341/bortezomib, doxorubicin and dexamethasone) for previously untreated patients with multiple myeloma. Br J Haematol 2005; 129: 755–62

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  87. Cavenagh JK, Curry N, Stec J, et al. PAD therapy (bortezomib, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone) for untreated multiple myeloma (MM) [abstract]. J Clin Oncol 2004; 22(14S): 6550a

    Google Scholar 

  88. Mateos MV, Hernandez JM, Hernandez MT, et al. Bortezomib plus melphalan and prednisolone in elderly untreated patients with multiple myeloma: results of a multicenter phase 1/2 study. Blood 2006; 108(7): 2165–72

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  89. Richardson P, Chanan-Khan A, Schlossman R, et al. Phase II trial of single agent bortezomib (Velcade) in patients with previously untreated multiple myeloma [abstract]. Blood 2004; 104(11): 336a

    Google Scholar 

  90. Richardson P, Chanan-Khan A, Schlossman N, et al. A multicenter phase II trial of bortezomib in patients with previously untreated multiple myeloma: efficacy with manageable toxicity in patients with unexpectedly high rates of baseline peripheral neuropathy [abstract]. Blood 2005; 106: 2548a

    Google Scholar 

  91. Wang M, Delasalle K, Alexanian R, et al. Rapid control of previously untreated multiple myeloma with bortezomib-thalidomide-dexamethasone followed by early intensive therapy [abstract]. Blood 2005; 106: 784a

    Google Scholar 

  92. Greco AF, Spigel RD, Barton JH, et al. Weekly bortezomib in the treatment of patients (pts) wtih previously treated multiple myeloma: a phase II trial of the Minnie Pearl Cancer Research Network [abstract]. J Clin Oncol 2006; 24 (18 Suppl.): 7547a

    Google Scholar 

  93. Suvannasankha A, Smith A, Abonour R. Weekly bortezomib with or without glucocorticosteroids is effective in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma [abstract]. Blood 2005; 106: 2652a

    Google Scholar 

  94. Moreau P, Coiteux C, Hulin T, et al. Prospective comparison of subcutaneous vs intravenous administration of bortezomib in patients with multiple myeloma: pharmacokinetics, efficacy and toxicity [abstract; poster no. 617]. XIth International Myeloma Workshop; 2007 Jun 25–30; Kos Island

  95. Myeloma Trialists’ Collaborative Group. Interferon as therapy for multiple myeloma: an individual patient data overview of 24 randomized trials and 4012 patients. Br J Haematol 2001; 113: 1020–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  96. Cunningham D, Powles R, Malpas J, et al. A randomised trial of maintenance interferon following high-dose chemotherapy in multiple myeloma: long term follow up results. Br J Haematol 1998; 102: 495–502

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  97. Berenson JR, Lichtenstein A, Porter L, et al. Maintenance with alternate-day prednisolone improves survival in multiple myeloma patients. Blood 2002; 99: 3163–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  98. Stewart AK, Chen CI, Howson-Jan K, et al. Results of multicenter randomized phase II trial of thalidomide and prednisone maintenance therapy for multiple myeloma after autologous stem cell transplant. Clin Cancer Res 2004; 10: 8170–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  99. Attal M, Harousseau JL, Leyvraz S, et al. Maintenance treatment with thalidomide after autologous transplantation for myeloma: final analysis of a prospective randomized study of the ‘Intergroupe Francophone du Myelome’ [abstract]. Blood 2005; 106: 1148a

    Google Scholar 

  100. Spencer A, Prince M, Roberts A, et al. First analysis of the Australasian Leukaemia and Lymphoma Group (ALLG) trial of thalidomide and alternate day prednisolone following autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) for patients with multiple myeloma (ALLG MM6) [abstract]. Blood 2006; 108: 58a

    Google Scholar 

  101. Buzaid AC, Durie GM. Management of refractory myeloma: a review. J Clin Oncol 1998; 6: 889–905

    Google Scholar 

  102. Alexanian R, Salmon S, Gutterman J, et al. Chemoimmunotherapy for multiple myeloma. Cancer 1981; 47: 1923–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  103. Barlogie B, Smith L, Alexanian R. Effective treatment of advanced multiple myeloma refractory to alkylating agents. N Engl J Med 1984; 310: 1353–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  104. Richardson P, Sonneveld P, Schuster MW, et al. Bortezomib or high-dose dexamethasone for relapsed multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med 2005; 352(24): 2487–98

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  105. Weber D, Wang M, Chen C, et al. Lenalidomide plus high dose dexamethasone provides improved overall survival compared to high dose dexamethasone alone for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (MM): results of 2 phase III studies (MM-009, MM-010) and subgroup analysis of patients with impaired renal function [abstract]. Blood 2006; 108: 3547a

    Google Scholar 

  106. Gertz MA, Lacy MQ, Inwards DJ, et al. Early harvest and late transplantation as an effective therapeutic strategy in myeloma. Bone Marrow Transplant 1999; 23: 221–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  107. Singhal S, Mehta J, Desikan R, et al. Antitumour activity of thalidomide in refractory multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med 1999; 341: 1565–71

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  108. Weber DM, Gavino M, Delasalle K, et al. Thalidomide alone or with dexamethasone for multiple myeloma [abstract]. Blood 1999; 94: 604a

    Google Scholar 

  109. Dimopolous AM, Zervas K, Kouvatseas G, et al. Thalidomide and dexamethasone combination for refractory multiple myeloma. Ann Oncol 2001; 12: 991–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  110. Palumbo A, Bertola A, Falco P, et al. Efficacy of low-dose thalidomide and dexamethasone as first salvage regimen in multiple myeloma. Hematol J 2004; 5: 318–24

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  111. Anagnostopoulos A, Weber D, Rankin K, et al. Thalidomide and dexamethasone for resistant multiple myeloma. Br J Haematol 2003; 121: 768–71

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  112. Mileshkin L, Biagi JJ, Mitchell P, et al. Multicenter phase 2 trial of thalidomide in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: adverse prognostic impact of advanced age. Blood 2003; 102: 69–77

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  113. Yakoub-Agha I, Hulin C, Doyen L, et al. A multicenter prospective randomised study testing non inferiority of thalidomide 100mg/d as compared with 400mg/d in patients with refractory/relapsed multiple myeloma: first results of the final analysis of the IFM 0–02 study [abstract]. J Clin Oncol 2006; 24(18S): 7520a

    Google Scholar 

  114. Offidani M, Corvatta L, Marconi M, et al. Low-dose thalidomide with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and high dose dexamethasone for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: a prospective, multicenter phase II study. Haematologica 2006; 91: 133–6

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  115. Moehler TM, Neben K, Benner A, et al. Salvage therapy for multiple myeloma with thalidomide and CED chemotherapy. Blood 2001; 98: 3846–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  116. Lee CK, Barlogie B, Munshi N, et al. DTP ACE: an effective novel combination chemotherapy with thalidomide for previously treated patients with myeloma. J Clin Oncol 2003; 21: 2732–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  117. Durie BGM, Harousseau JL, Miguel JS, et al. International uniform response criteria for multiple myeloma. Leukemia 2006; 20: 1467–73

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  118. Prince HM, Schenkel B, Mileshkin L. Assessing response rates in clinical trials of treatment for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: a study of bortezomib and thalidomide. Leukemia 2007; 21(4): 818–20

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  119. Richardson GP, Blood E, Mitsiades SC, et al. A randomised phase 2 study of lenalidomide therapy for patients with relapsed or relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma. Blood 2006; 108(10): 3458–64

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  120. Richardson PG, Jagannath S, Schlossman R, et al. A multi-center, randomised, phase 2 study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 2 CDC-5013 dose regimens when used alone or in combination with dexamethasone (dex) for the treatment of relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (MM) [abstract]. Blood 2003; 102: 825a

    Google Scholar 

  121. Chanan-Khan AA, Weber D, Dimopolous M, et al. Lenalidomide (L) in combination with dexamethasone (D) improves survival and time to progression in elderly patients (pts) with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma [abstract]. Blood 2006; 108: 3551a

    Google Scholar 

  122. Weber DM, Chen C, Nievizky R, et al. A multicenter randomized parallel group double blind placebo controlled study of lenalidomide plus dexamethasone versus dexamethasone alone in previously treated subjects with multiple myeloma [abstract]. Haematologica 2005; 90Suppl. 1: 155

    Google Scholar 

  123. Dimopoulos M, Spencer A, Attal M, et al. Study of lenalidomide plus dexamethasone versus dexamethasone alone in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (MM): results of a phase 3 study (MM-010) [abstract]. Blood 2005; 106(11): 6a

    Google Scholar 

  124. Celgene Corporation. Revlimid (lenalidomide) [package insert]. Summit (NJ): Celgene Corporation, 2006

    Google Scholar 

  125. Lonial S, Knight R, Dimopoulos M, et al. Effect of LEN/DEX in MM in different age groups [poster]. Xlth International Myeloma Workshop; 2007 Jun 25–30; Kos Island

  126. Richardson P, Barlogie B, Berenson J, et al. A phase 2 study of bortezomib in relapsed, refractory myeloma. N Engl J Med 2003; 348(26): 2609–17

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  127. Jagannath S, Barlogie, B, Berenson J, et al. A phase 2 study of two doses of bortezomib in relapsed or refractory myeloma. Br J Haematol 2004; 127: 165–72

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  128. Richardson P, Sonneveld P, Schuster M, et al. Bortezomib continues demonstrates superior efficacy compared with high-dose dexamethasone in relapsed multiple myeloma: updated results of the APEX trial [abstract]. Blood 2005; 106: 2547a

    Google Scholar 

  129. Prince HM, Adena M, Smith DK, et al. Efficacy of single-agent bortezomib vs. single-agent thalidomide in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: a systematic comparison. Eur J Haematol 2007; 79: 93–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  130. Richardson P, Sonneveld P, Schuster M, et al. Safety and efficacy of bortezomib in high-risk and elderly patients with relapsed myeloma [abstract]. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23(16S): 6533a

    Google Scholar 

  131. Jagannath S, Richardson P, Sonnoveld P, et al. Bortezomib appears to overcome poor prognosis conferred by chromosome 13 deletion in phase 2 and 3 trials [abstract]. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23(16S): 6501a

    Google Scholar 

  132. Richardson P, Barlogie B, Berenson J, et al. Clinical factors predictive of outcome with bortezomib in patients with relapsed refractory multiple myeloma. Blood 2005; 106: 2977–81

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  133. San Miguel J, Blade J, Boccadoro M, et al. A practical update on the use of bortezomib in the management of multiple myeloma. Oncologist 2006; 11: 51–61

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  134. Chanan-Khan AA, Sonneveld P, Schuster WM, et al. Analysis of varicella zoster virus reactivation among bortezomib-treated patients in the APEX study [abstract]. Blood 2006; 108: 3535a

    Google Scholar 

  135. Peles S, Fisher NM, Devien SM, et al. Bortezomib when given pretransplant and once weekly as consolidation therapy following high dose chemotherapy leads to high rates of reactivation of varicella zoster virus [abstract]. Blood 2005; 106: 3237a

    Google Scholar 

  136. Kenealy KM, Prince HM, Honemann D. Tumour lysis syndrome early after treatment with bortezomib for multiple myeloma. Pharmacotherapy 2006; 26: 1205–6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  137. Schey SA, Cavenagh J, Johnson R, et al. An UK myeloma forum phase II study of thalidomide: long term follow-up and recommendations for treatment. Leuk Res 2003; 27: 909–14

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  138. Berenson J, Lichtenstein A, Porter L, et al. Long-term pamidronate treatment of advanced multiple myeloma patients reduces skeletal events. J Clin Oncol 1998; 16: 593–602

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  139. Rosen LS, Gordon D, Antonio BS, et al. Zoledronic acid versus pamidronate in the treatment of skeletal metastases in patient with breast cancer or osteolytic lesions of multiple myeloma: a phase II double-blind comparative trial. Cancer J 2001; 7: 377–87

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  140. McClosley EV, Dunn JA, Kanis JA, et al. Long term follow-up of a prospective double blind placebo-controlled randomized trail of clodronate in multiple myeloma. Br J Haematol 2001; 113: 1035–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  141. Green JR, Mulier K, Jaeggi KA. Preclinical pharmacology of CGP 42’446, a new potent heterocyclic bisphosphonate compound. J Bone Miner Res 1994; 9: 745–51

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  142. Rosen LS, Gordon D, Kaminski M, et al. Long term efficacy and safety of zoledronic acid compared with pamidronate disodium in the treatment of skeletal complications in patients with advanced multiple myeloma or breast carcinoma: a randomized, double-blind, multicenter, comparative trial. Cancer 2003; 98: 1735–44

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  143. Kyle AR, Yee CG, Somerfield RM, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology 2007 clinical practice guideline update on the role of bisphosphonates in multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol 2007; 25: 2464–72

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  144. Badros A, Weikel D, Salama A, et al. Osteonecrosis of the jaw in multiple myeloma patients: clinical features and risk factors. J Clin Oncol 2006; 24(6): 945–52

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  145. Seshardri T, Prince M, Bell D, et al. The Australian Cancer Anaemia Survey: a snapshot of anaemia in adult patients with cancer. Med J Aus 2005; 182(9): 453–7

    Google Scholar 

  146. Birgegard G, Gascon P, Ludwig H. Evaluation of anaemia in patients with multiple myeloma and lymphoma: findings of the European CANCER ANAEMIA SURVEY. Eur J Haematol 2006; 77: 378–86

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  147. Dammaccos F, Castoldi G, Rodjer S. Efficacy of epoetin alfa in the treatment of anaemia of multiple myeloma. Br J Haematol 2001; 113: 172–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  148. Hedenus M, Adriansson M, San Miguel J, et al. Efficacy and safety of darbepoetin alfa in anaemic patients with lymphoproliferative malignancies: a randomized, double blind, placebo controlled study. Br J Haematol 2003; 122: 394–403

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  149. Cazzola M, Messinger D, Battistell V, et al. Recombinant human erythropoietin in the anemia associated with multiple myeloma or non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma: dose finding and identification of predictors of response. Blood 1995; 86: 4446–53

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  150. Harousseau JL, Jagannath S, Richardson P, et al. Bortezomib in combination with high-dose dexamethasone (HD dex) and erythropoietin (EPO) does not result in an increased risk of thromboembolic complications [abstract]. Blood 2006; 108: 3543a

    Google Scholar 

  151. Rizzo JD, Lichtin AE, Woolf SH, et al. Use of epoetin in patients with cancer: evidence based clinical practice guidelines of the American Society of Clinical Oncology and American Society of Hematology. J Clin Oncol 2002; 20: 4083–107

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  152. Henke M, Laszig R, Rube C, et al. Erythropoietin to treat head and neck cancer patients with anaemia undergoing radiotherapy: randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2003; 362: 1255–60

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  153. Leyland-Jones B, Siemiglazov V, Pawlicki M, et al. Maintaining normal hemoglobin levels with epoietin alfa in mainly nonanaemic patients with metastatic breast cancer receiving first-line chemotherapy: a survival study. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23: 5960–72

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  154. Khuri RF. Weighing the hazards of erythropoiesis stimulation in patients with cancer. N Engl J Med 2007; 356: 2445–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  155. Longmore DG. Do cancer cells express functional erythropoietic receptors? N Engl J Med 2007; 356: 2447

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  156. Morgan GI, Davies FE. Evolving treatment strategies for myeloma. Br J Cancer 2005; 92: 217–21

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

No sources of funding were used to assist in the preparation of this review. Dr Prince has acted as a consultant to Celgene and Janssen-Cilag and has been the recipient of a research grant from Celgene. The other authors have no potential conflicts of interest that are directly relevant to the content of this review.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Haematology and Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and University of Melbourne, Locked Bag 1, A’Beckett Street, Melbourne, VIC, 8006, Australia

    Hang Quach,  H. Miles Prince & Linda Mileshkin

Authors
  1. Hang Quach
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. H. Miles Prince
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Linda Mileshkin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H. Miles Prince.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Quach, H., Prince, H.M. & Mileshkin, L. Treatment Strategies in Elderly Patients with Multiple Myeloma. Drugs Aging 24, 829–850 (2007). https://doi.org/10.2165/00002512-200724100-00004

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00002512-200724100-00004

Keywords

Search

Navigation