Skip to main content
Log in

Regulatory Decisions in a Globalised World

The Domino Effect of Phenylpropanolamine Withdrawal in Latin America

  • Current Opinion
  • Published:
Drug Safety Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rapid drug regulatory decisions regarding phenylpropanolamine (PPA)-containing common cold remedies and diet pills were taken in some Latin American countries following a Food and Drug Administration (FDA) decision in the US. This situation is described as one that illustrates the important changes that regulatory decisions are experiencing as a consequence of globalisation.

The evidence for the efficacy of PPA as a nasal decongestant and as an appetite-suppressant is very limited, at least by modern standards. Its potential to increase blood pressure and induce haemorrhagic stroke was described soon after its marketing. Although this poor benefit/risk ratio had been known for more than 20 years, regulatory action was taken in Latin America only after the US FDA withdrew the drug in the US on the basis of the results of a case-control study which added limited new evidence to the already known risk of stroke, but which, on the other hand, had attracted much attention from the media.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Table I

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Stolley PD, Laporte JR. The public health, the university, and pharmacoepidemiology. In: Strom BL, editor. Pharmacoepidemiology. New York; John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 2000

    Google Scholar 

  2. Glaxo withdraws grepafloxacin worldwide. Scrip 1999; 2485: 21

  3. Tolcapone and fatal liver injury.WHO Drug Information 1999; 13: 17

  4. Rawlins, MD. Adverse reactions to drugs. BMJ 1981; 282: 974–6

    Google Scholar 

  5. E-drug’ discussion list [online]. Available from URL: http://www.healthnet.org/programs/edrug.html [Accessed 2002 Jul 16]

  6. E-farmacos’ discussion list [online]. Available from URL: http://www.healthnet.org/programs/efarmacos.html [Accessed 2002 Jul 16]

  7. Johnson DA, Etter HS, Reeves DH. Stroke and phenylpropanolamine use [letter]. Lancet 1983; II: 970

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Accidents cardiaques et neurologiques dûs à la phénylpropanolamine [in French]. La Revue Prescrire 1999; 19: 599

  9. Kernan WN, Viscoli CM, Brass LM, et al. Phenylpropanolamine and the risk of hemorrhagic stroke. N Engl J Med 2000; 343: 1826–32

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Charatan F. Phenylpropanolamine in drugs could bear risk for stroke [news]. BMJ 2000; 321: 1037

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Phenylpropanolamine: strengthening of patient information. United Kingdom. WHO Drug Information 2001; 14: 226

  12. Phenylpropanolamine and other OTC alpha-adrenergic agonists. Med Letter Drugs Ther 2000; 42: 113

  13. Lee KY, Beilin LJ, Vandongen R. Severe hypertension after ingestion of an appetite suppressant (phenylpropanolamine) with indomethacin [letter]. Lancet 1979; I: 110–1

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bennett WM. Hazards of the appetite suppressant phenylpropanolamine [letter]. Lancet 1979; II: 42–3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Jick H, Aselton P, Hunter JR. Phenylpropanolamine and cerebral haemorrhage [letter]. Lancet 1984; I: 1017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Strom BL, Carson JL. Use of automated databases for pharmacoepidemiology research. Epidemiol Rev 1990; 12: 87–107

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Lake RC, Gallant S, Masson E. Adverse drug effects attributed to phenylpropanolamine: a review of 142 case reports. Am J Med 1990; 89: 195–208

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Taverner D, Bickford L, Draper M. Nasal decongestants for the common cold (Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 4, 2000. Oxford: Update Software

    Google Scholar 

  19. Fleming GA. The FDA, regulation and the risk of stroke. N Engl J Med 2000; 343: 1886–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the active participants in the electronic discussion lists e-farmacos and e-drugs. We are also grateful to Dr Dolors Capellà (Fundació ICF, Barcelona, Spain) for her useful comments and suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joan-Ramon Laporte.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Figueras, A., Laporte, JR. Regulatory Decisions in a Globalised World. Drug-Safety 25, 689–693 (2002). https://doi.org/10.2165/00002018-200225100-00001

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00002018-200225100-00001

Keywords

Navigation