Spontaneous revegetation of cutwaway peatlands of North America
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Modern extraction methods permit peat to be extracted to the minerotrophic layer of ombrotrophic peatlands (bogs). As the environmental conditions of these harvested peatlands are similar to minerotrophic peatlands (fens), such sites should be restored towards a fen system. However, it is not known whether fen species would recolonize such harvested sites on their own. We surveyed vegetation and environmental variables in 28 harvested peatlands with minerotrophic residual peat across Canada and in Minnesota, USA, and compared them to 11 undisturbed fens. Compared to harvested bogs previously studied, the harvested fens sampled in this study revegetated remarkably quickly (50%–70% vegetation cover) when the hydrological conditions were suitable. However, revegetation was less extensive for sites that were still drained (25% vegetation cover). A high water table and a thin layer of residual peat were the most important factors contributing to rapid recolonization rates. Although the harvested fens were rapidly recolonized, species composition was not the same as observed on undisturbed fens. Carex and Sphagnum, dominant in undisturbed fens, generally did not recolonize harvested fens. Thus, whether the goal is to increase species richness or to ensure the return of peat accumulating functions, fen species may have to be actively introduced.
Andersen, R., A.-J. Francez, and L. Rochefort. 2006. The physicochemical and microbial status of a restored bog in Québec: identification of relevant criteria to monitor success. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 38: 1375–87.CrossRef
Anderson, L. E. 1990. A checklist of Sphagnum in North America north of Mexico. Bryologist 93: 500–01.CrossRef
Anderson, L. E., H. A. Crum, and W. R. Buck. 1990. List of the mosses of North America north of Mexico. Bryologist 93: 448–99.CrossRef
Bedford, B. L. and K. S. Godwin. 2003. Fens of the United States: distribution, characteristics, and scientific connection versus legal isolation. Wetlands 23: 608–29.CrossRef
Bogren, K. and S. Hofer. 2001. Determination of orthophosphate in Bray or Mehlich extracts of soils by flow injection analysis. In Zellweger Analytics Lachat Instruments. Methods Manual. Quick-Chem Method 12-115-01-1-A. Zellweger Analytics, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Bradshaw, A. 2000. The use of natural processes in reclamation-advantages and difficulties. Landscape and Urban Planning 51: 89–100.CrossRef
Bray, R. L. and L. T. Kurtz. 1945. Determination of total organic and available forms of phosphorus in soils. Soil Science 59: 39–45.CrossRef
Cobbaert, D., L. Rochefort, and J. Price. 2004. Experimental restoration of a fen plant community after peat mining. Applied Vegetation Science 7: 209–20.CrossRef
Cooper, D. and L. MacDonald. 2000. Restoring the vegetation of mined peatlands in the southern Rocky Mountains of Colorado, USA. Restoration Ecology 8: 103–11.CrossRef
Environment Canada. 2002. Canadian climate normals 1971–2000. Atmospheric Environment Service, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Famous, N. C., M. Spencer, and H. Nilsson. 1991. Revegetation patterns in harvested peatlands in central and eastern North America. p. 48–66. In D. N. Grubich and T. J. Malterer (eds.) Peat and Peatlands: The Resource and its Utilization. Proceedings of the International Peat Symposium Duluth, Minnesota, USA.
Girard, M., C. Lavoie, and M. Thériault. 2002. The regeneration of a highly disturbed ecosystem: a mined peatland in southern Québec. Ecosystems 5: 274–88.CrossRef
Gorham, E. and J. A. Janssens. 1992. Concepts of fen and bog reexamined in relation to bryophyte cover and the acidity of surface waters. Acta Societatis Botanicorum Poloniae 61: 7–20.
Harrison, S., S. J. Ross, and J. H. Lawton. 1992. Beta diversity on geographic gradients in Britain. Journal of Animal Ecology 61: 151–58.CrossRef
Hillel, D. 1998. Environmental Soil Physics. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, USA.
Johnson, D., L. Kerschaw, and A. MacKinnon. 1995. Plants of the Western Boreal Forest and Aspen Parkland. Lone Pine Publishing, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Kuhry, P., B. Nicholson, L. Gignac, D. Vitt, and S. E. Bayley. 1993. Development of Sphagnum-dominated peatlands in boreal continental Canada. Canadian Journal of Botany 71: 10–22.CrossRef
Lanta, V., J. Dolezal, and J. Samata. 2004. Vegetation patterns in a cut-away peatland in relation to abiotic and biotic factors: a case study from the Sumava Mts., Czech Republic. Suo 55: 33–43.
Lavoie, C., P. Grosvernier, M. Girard, and K. Marcoux. 2003. Spontaneous revegetation of mined peatlands: a useful restoration tool? Wetlands Ecology and Management 11: 97–107.CrossRef
Lavoie, C. and L. Rochefort. 1996. The natural revegetation of a harvested peatland in southern Québec: a spatial and dendroecological analysis. Écoscience 3: 101–11.
Legendre, P. and E. Gallagher. 2001. Ecologically meaningful transformations for ordination of species data. Oecologia 129: 271–80.CrossRef
Magurran, A. E. 2003. Measuring Biological Diversity. Blackwell Publishing, Carlton, Victoria, Australia.
Malterer, T. J., E. S. Verry, and J. Erjavec. 1992. Fiber content and degree of decomposition in peats: review of national methods. Soil Science Society of America Journal 56: 1200–11.CrossRef
Marie-Victorin, F. 1995. Flore Laurentinne (3éme Edition). Gaëtan Morin Éditeur, Boucherville, QC, Canada.
Mehlich, A. 1984. Mehlich-3 soil test extractant: a modification of Mehlich-2 extractant. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 15: 1409–16.CrossRef
National Climatic Data Center. 2001. US climate normals, 1971–2000. http://lwf.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/climate/normals/usnormals.html.
Newmaster, S., A. Harris, and L. Kershaw. 1996. Wetland Plants of Ontario. Lone Pine Publishing, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
O’Connell, C. (ed.). 2000. Cutover and Cutaway Bogs Education Pack. Irish Peatland Conservation Council, Dublin, Ireland.
Patzelt, A., U. Wild, and J. Pfadenhauer. 2001. Restoration of wet fen meadows by topsoil removal: vegetation development and germination biology of fen species. Restoration Ecology 9: 127–36.CrossRef
Poulin, M., L. Rochefort, F. Quinty, and C. Lavoie. 2005. Spontaneous revegetation of mined peatlands in eastern Canada. Canadian Journal of Botany 83: 539–57.CrossRef
Prach, K., B. Sandor, P. Pysek, R. van Diggelen, and G. Wiegleb. 2001. The role of spontaneous vegetation succession in ecosystem restoration: a perspective. Applied Vegetation Science 4: 111–14.CrossRef
Price, J., A. L. Healthwaite, and A. J. Baird. 2003. Hydrological processes in abandoned and restored peatlands: an overview of management approaches. Wetlands Ecology and Management 11: 65–83.CrossRef
Rochefort, L. 2000. Sphagnum-a keystone genus in habitat restoration. New Frontiers in Bryology and Licehnology 103: 505–08.
Rochefort, L., F. Quinty, S. Campeau, K. W. Johnson, and T. J. Malterer. 2003. North American approach to the restoration of Sphagnum dominated peatlands. Wetlands Ecology and Management 11: 3–20.CrossRef
Roth, S., T. Seeger, P. Poschlod, J. Pfadenhauer, and M. Succow. 1999. Establishment of helophytes in the course of fen restoration. Applied Vegetation Science 2: 131–36.CrossRef
Rowlands, R. 2001. The ecological restoration through natural revegetation of industrial cutaway peatlands in Ireland. Ph.D. Dissertation. University College, Dublin, Ireland.
Salonen, V. 1992. Plant colonization of harvested peat surfaces. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland.
Schoch, W. H. 1988. Botanical Macro-remains. Paul Haupt Berne. Stuttgart, Germany.
Scoggan, H. J. 1978. The Flora of Canada. National Museums of Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Sjörs, H. 1952. On the relation between vegetation and electrolytes in north Swedish mire waters. Oikos 2: 241–58.CrossRef
Sliva, J. 1997. Renaturierung von industriell abgeforften Hochmooren am Beispiel der Kendlmühlfilzen. Ph.D. Dissertation. Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Sliva, J. and J. Pfadenhauer. 1999. Restoration of cut-over raised bogs in southern Germany- a comparison of methods. Applied Vegetation Science 2: 137–48.CrossRef
Soro, A., S. Sundberg, and H. Rydin. 1999. Species diversity, niche metrics and species associations in harvested and undisturbed bogs. Journal of Vegetation Science 10: 549–60.CrossRef
van Duren, I. C., R. K. Strykstra, A. P. Grootjans, G. N. J. ter Heerdt, and D. M. Pegtel. 1998. A multidisciplinary evaluation of restoration measures in a degraded Cirsio-Molinietum fen meadow. Applied Vegetation Science 1: 115–30.CrossRef
Vitt, D. H. 2006. Functional characteristics and indicators of boreal peatlands. p. 9–24. In R. K. Wieder and D. H. Vitt (eds.) Boreal Peatland Systems. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.CrossRef
Vitt, D. H. and W.-L. Chee. 1990. The relationship of vegetation to surface water chemistry and peat chemisty in fens of Alberta, Canada. Vegetatio 89: 87–106.CrossRef
Wind-Mulder, H. L., L. Rochefort, and D. H. Vitt. 1996. Water and peat chemistry comparisons of natural and post-harvested peatlands across Canada and their relevance to peatland restoration. Ecological Engineering 7: 161–81.CrossRef
Wind-Mulder, H. L. and D. H. Vitt. 2000. Comparison of water and peat chemistries of a post-harvested and undisturbed peatland with relevance to restoration. Wetlands 20: 616–28.CrossRef
- Spontaneous revegetation of cutwaway peatlands of North America
Volume 28, Issue 1 , pp 28-39
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- milled peatlands