Ambrose, R. F., J. C. Callaway, and S. F. Lee. 2006. An evaluation of compensatory mitigation projects permitted under Clean Water Act Section 401 by the California State Water Quality Control Board, 1991–2002. Report to the State Water Resources Control Board. University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Andreas, B. K., J. J. Mack, and J. S. McCormac. 2004. Floristic Quality Assessment Index (FQAI) for vascular plants and mosses for the State of Ohio. Ohio Environmental Protection Agency, Division of Surface Water, Wetland Ecology Group, Columbus, OH, USA.
Baber, M. J., E. Fleishman, K. J. Babbitt, and T. L. Tarr. 2004. The relationship between wetland hydroperiod and nestedness patterns in assemblages of larval amphibians and predatory macroinvertebrates. Oikos 107: 16–27.CrossRef
Bedford, B. L. and E. M. Preston. 1988. Developing a scientific basis for assessing cumulative effects of wetland loss and degradation on landscape functions: status, perspectives, and prospects. Environmental Management 12: 751–72.CrossRef
Brinson, M. M. and R. Rheinhardt. 1996. The role of reference wetlands in functional assessment and mitigation. Ecological Applications 6: 69–76.CrossRef
Brooks, R. P., T. J. O’Connell, D. H. Wardrop, and L. E. Jackson. 1998. Towards a regional index of biological integrity: the example of forested riparian ecosystems. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 51: 131–43.CrossRef
Brown, M. T. and M. B. Vivas. 2005. Landscape development intensity index. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 101: 289–309.CrossRefPubMed
Bryce, S. A., R. M. Hughes, and P. R. Kaufmann. 2002. Development of a bird integrity index: using bird assemblages as indicators of riparian condition. Environmental Management 30: 294–310.CrossRefPubMed
Burton, G. A., Jr., P. M. Chapman, and E. P. Smith. 2002. Weight-of-evidence approaches for assessing ecosystem impairment. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment 8: 1657–73.CrossRef
Cohen, M. J., C. R. Lane, K. C. Reiss, J. A. Surdick, E. Bardi, and M. T. Brown. 2005. Vegetation based classification trees for rapid assessment of isolated wetland condition. Ecological Indicators 5: 189–206.CrossRef
Collins, J. N., E. D. Stein, M. Sutula, R. Clark, A. E. Fetscher, L. Grenier, C. Grosso, and A. Wiskind. 2006. California rapid assessment method (CRAM) for wetlands and riparian areas. Version 4.5, San Francisco Estuary Institute. Oakland, CA. www.cramwetlands.org.
Cowardin, L., V. Carter, F. Golet, and E. Laroe. 1979. Classification of wetlands and deepwater habitats of the United States. Washington, D. C.: United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Biological Services Program. FWS/OBS-79/31.
DeZwart, D., S. D. Dyer, L. Posthuma, and C. P. Hawkins. 2006. Predictive models attribute effects on fish assemblages to toxicity and habitat alteration. Ecological Applications 16: 1295–1310.CrossRef
Fennessy, M. S., A. D. Jacobs, and M. E. Kentula. 2004. Review of rapid methods for assessing wetland condition. National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, EPA/620/R-04/009.
Fennessy, M. S., A. D. Jacobs, and M. E. Kentula. 2007. An evaluation of rapid methods for assessing the ecological condition of wetlands. Wetlands 27: 543–60.CrossRef
Griffith, M. B., B. H. Hill, F. H. McCormick, P. R. Kaufmann, A. T. Herlihy, and A. R. Selle. 2005. Comparative application of indices of biotic integrity based on periphyton, macroinvertebrates, and fish to southern Rocky Mountain streams. Ecological Indicators 5: 117–36.CrossRef
Harrington, J. M. 1999. California stream bioassessment procedure. California Department of Fish and Game, Water Pollution Control Laboratory. Rancho Cordova, CA.
Hauer, F. R., B. J. Cook, M. C. Gilbert, E. J. Clairain, Jr., and R. D. Smith. 2002. A regional guidebook for applying the hydrogeomorphic approach to assessing wetland functions of intermontane prairie pothole wetlands in the Northern Rocky Mountains. U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Vicksburg, MS, Technical Report ERDC/EL TR-02-7.
Hawkins, C. P. 2006. Quantifying biological integrity by taxonomic completeness: its utility in regional and global assessment. Ecological Applications 16: 1277–94.CrossRefPubMed
Hill, A. J., V. S. Neary, and K. L. Morgan. 2006. Hydrologic modeling as a development tool for HGM functional assessment models. Wetlands 6: 161–80.CrossRef
Hruby, T., T. Granger, K. Brunner, S. Cooke, K. Dublanica, R. Gersib, L. Reinelt, K. Richter, D. Sheldon, E. Teachout, A. Wald, and F. Weinmann. 1999. Methods for assessing wetland functions volume I: riverine and depressional wetlands in the lowlands of western Washington. Washington State Department Ecology Publication #99–115.
Institute for Bird Populations (IBP). 2006. The monitoring avian productivity and survivorship (MAPS) program, Point Reyes Station, CA, http://www.birdpop.org/maps.htm.
Janssen, P. H. M. and P. S. C. Heuberger. 1995. Calibration of process-oriented models. Ecologic Modeling 83: 55–66.CrossRef
Karr, J. R. and E. W. Chu. 1999. Restoring life in running waters: better biological monitoring. Island Press, Washington, DC.
Kentula, M. E. 2007. Monitoring wetlands at the watershed scale. Wetlands 27: 412–15.CrossRef
Lee, L. C., P. L. Fiedler, S. R. Stewart, D. J. Partridge, J. A. Mason, E. M. Inlander, and M. C. Rains. 2003. Draft operational guidebook for assessment of the functions of riverine waters/wetlands in the Santa Margarita watershed, Riverside & San Diego counties, California. San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board, Technical Publication. San Diego, CA.
Linthurst, R. A., L. A. Mulkey, M. W. Slimak, G. D. Veith, and B. M. Levinson. 2000. Ecological research in the office of research and development at the U.S. environmental protection agency: an overview of new directions. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 19: 1222–29.CrossRef
Mack, J. J. 2001. Vegetation Indices of Biotic Integrity (VIBI) for Wetlands: Ecoregional, Hydrogeomorphic, and Plant Community Comparison with Preliminary Aquatic Life Use Designations. Final Report to U.S. EPA Grant No. CD985875, Volume 1. Wetland Ecology Group, Division of Surface Water, Ohio Environmental Protection Agency, Columbus, OH.
Mack, J. J. 2006. Landscape as a predictor of wetland condition: an evaluation of the landscape development index (LDI) with a large reference wetland dataset from Ohio. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 120: 221–41.CrossRefPubMed
Micacchion, M. 2004. Integrated wetland assessment program. part 7: amphibian index of biotic integrity (AmphIBI) for Ohio wetlands. Ohio Environmental Protection Agency, Wetland Ecology Group, Division of Surface Water, Columbus, OH, Ohio EPA Technical Report WET/2004-7.
Miller, S. W., Q. D. Skinner, and K. J. Reddy. 2004. Stream assessment using biotic indices: responses to physicochemical variables. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 40: 1173–87.CrossRef
Ode, P. R., A. C. Rehn, and J. T. May. 2005. A quantitative tool for assessing the integrity of southern coastal California streams. Environmental Management 35: 493–504.CrossRefPubMed
Oreskes, N., K. Shraderfrechette, and K. Belitz. 1994. Verification, validation, and confirmation of numerical-models in the earth-sciences. Science 263: 641–46.CrossRefPubMed
Reiss, K. C. and M. T. Brown. 2007. Evaluation of Florida palustrine wetlands: application of USEPA levels 1, 2, and 3 assessment methods. EcoHealth 4: 206–18.CrossRef
Resh, V. H. and J. K. Jackson. 1993. Rapid assessment approaches to biomonitoring using benthic macroinvertebrates. p. 195–233. In D. M. Rosenberg and V. H. Resh (eds.) Freshwater Biomonitoring and Benthic Macroinvertebrates. Chapman and Hall, New York, NY, USA.
Smith, R. D., A. Ammann, C. Bartoldus, and M. M. Brinson. 1995. An approach for assessing wetland functions using hydrogeomorphic classification, reference wetlands, and functional indices. Waterways Experiment Station, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Vicksburg, MS, Technical Report WRP-DE-9.
Smith, E. P., I. Lipkovich, and K. Ye. 2002. Weight-of-evidence (WOE): quantitative estimation of probability of impairment for individual and multiple lines of evidence. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment 8: 1585–96.CrossRef
Stapanian, M. A., T. A. Waite, G. Krzys, J. J. Mack, and M. Micacchion. 2004. Rapid assessment indicator of wetland integrity as an unintended predictor of avian diversity. Hydrobiologia 520: 119–26.CrossRef
Stoddard, J. L., D. P. Larsen, C. P. Hawkins, R. K. Johnson, and R. H. Norris. 2006. Setting expectations for the ecological condition of streams: the concept of reference condition. Ecological Applications 16: 1267–76.CrossRefPubMed
Sutula, M., J. N. Collins, J. Callaway, T. Parker, M. Vasey, and E. Wittner. 2001. Quality assurance project plan (QAPP) for environmental monitoring and assessment program, west coast pilot 2002 intertidal assessment: California intensification. Southern California Coastal Water Research Project. Costa Mesa, CA.
Sutula, M. A., E. D. Stein, J. N. Collins, A. E. Fetscher, and R. Clark. 2006. A Practical Guide for the Development of a Wetland Assessment Method: The California Experience. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 42: 157–75.CrossRef
Talmage, P. J., J. A. Perry, and R. M. Goldstein. 2002. Relation of instream habitat and physical conditions to fish communities of agricultural streams in the northern Midwest. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 22: 825–33.CrossRef
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2002. Research strategy: environmental monitoring and assessment program. Office of Research and Development. Research Triangle Park. p. 78, http://www.epa.gov/emap/html/pubs/docs/resdocs/ resstrat02.html.
Wardrop, D. H., M. E. Kentula, D. L. StevensJr, S. F. Jensen, and R. P. Brooks. 2007. Assessment of wetland condition: an example from the Upper Juniata watershed in Pennsylvania, USA. Wetlands 27: 416–30.CrossRef
Whittier, T. R., R. M. Hughes, J. L. Stoddard, G. A. Lomnicky, D. V. Peck, and A. T. Herlihy. 2007. A structured approach for developing indices of biotic integrity: three examples from streams and rivers in the western USA. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 136: 718–35.CrossRef