Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Valuing urban wetlands: A review of non-market valuation studies

  • Published:
Wetlands Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Wetlands provide a range of valuable ecosystem services from water purification and nutrient retention to recreation and aesthetics. The value of these services is often difficult to quantify and document to policy makers and the general public. Economists have developed non-market approaches to address difficult issues related to valuation of the environment. This paper reviews recent literature on non-market valuation as applied to wetlands, with a particular focus on the value of urban wetlands. Wetland valuation studies have generated a wide range of values, in part due to differences in what is valued and in part due to differences in methodology. Several studies have shown that property owners value proximity to wetlands in urban areas. In addition, studies have found positive values for recreation (fishing and hunting), commercial fishing, water purification, and other ecosystem services provided by wetlands, although little of this work has been done on urban wetlands. Valuation studies can provide useful information about relative rankings of value, showing, for example, that certain types of wetlands or certain services are more highly valued than others. Whether the absolute magnitude of valuation estimates is correct is less clear.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Acharya, G. 2000. Approaches to valuing the hidden hydrological services of wetland ecosystems. Ecological Economics 35:63–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acharya, G. and E. B. Barbier. 2000. Valuing groundwater recharge through agricultural production in the Hadejia’ Jama’ are wetlands in Northern Nigeria. Agricultural Economics 22:247–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acharya, G. and E. B. Barbier. 2002. Using domestic water analysis to value groundwater recharge in the Hadejia’ Jama’ are Floodplain in northern Nigeria. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 84:415–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K. and A. C. Fisher. 1974. Environmental preservation, uncertainty, and irreversibility. Quarterly Journal of Economics 88: 312–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azevedo, C. D., J. A. Herriges, and C. L. Kling. 2000. Ask a hypothetical question, get a valuable answer? Center for Agricultural and Rural Development, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, USA. Working Paper 000-WP 260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Azous, A. L. and R. M. Horner. 2000. Wetlands and Urbanization: Implications for the Future. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbier, E. B. 2000. Valuing the environment as an input: review of mangrove-fishery linkages. Ecological Economics 35:47–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbier, E. B., M. Acreman, and D. Knowler. 1997. Economic Valuation of Wetlands: a Guide for Policy Makers and Planners. Ramsar Convention Bureau, Gland, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbier, E. B. and I. Strand. 1998. Valuing mangrove-fishery linkages: a case study of Campeche, Mexico. Environmental and Resource Economics 12:51–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbier, E. B., I. Strand, and S. Sathirathai. 2002. Do open access conditions affect the valuation of an externality? Estimating the welfare effects of mangrove-fishery linkages in Thailand. Environmental and Resource Economics 21:343–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batie, S. S. and J. R. Wilson. 1978. Economic values attributable to Virginia’s coastal wetlands as inputs in oyster production. Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics 10:111–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, M., K. L. Heck, K. W. Able, D. L. Childers, D. B. Eggleston, B. M. Gillanders, B. Halpern, C. G. Hays, K. Hoshino, T. J. Minello, R. J. Orth, P. F. Sheridan, and M. P. Weinstein. 2001. The identification, conservation and management of estuarine and marine nurseries for fishes and invertebrates. BioScience 51:633–641.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, F. W. 1989. Application of wetland valuation theory to Florida fisheries. Florida Sea Grant Program, Tallahassee, FL, USA. Report No. 95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, F. W. 1997. The economic value of saltwater marsh supporting marine recreational fishing the Southeastern United States. Ecological Economics 21:243–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bin, O. and S. Polasky. 2004. Evidence on the amenity value of wetlands in a rural setting. Department of Economics, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boesch, D. F. and R. E. Turner. 1984. Dependence of fishery species on salt marshes: the role of food and refuge. Estuaries 7:460–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Booth, D. B. 1991. Urbanization and the natural drainage system— impacts, solutions, and prognoses. Northwest Environmental Journal. 7:93–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breaux, A. M., S. Farber, and J. Day. 1995. Using Natural coastal wetlands systems for wastewater treatment and economic benefit analysis. Journal of Environmental Management 44:285–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brinson, M. 1993. Changes in functioning along environmental gradients. Wetlands 13:65–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brinson, M. and R. Rheinhardt. 1996. The role of reference wetlands in functional assessment and mitigation. Ecological Applications 6:69–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carson, R. T. 2004. Contingent Valuation: A Comprehensive Bibliography and History. Edward Elgar, Northampton, MA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Central and Southern Florida Project. 1999. Comprehensive Review Study: Final Integrated Feasibility Report and Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement. South Florida Water Management District, West Palm Beach, FL, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chichilnisky, G. and G. Heal. 1998. Economic returns from the biosphere. Nature 391:629–630.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, J. and J. Loomis. 1991. Economic value of wildlife resources in the San Joaquin Valley: hunting and viewing values. p. 447–463. In A. Dinar and D. Zilberman (eds.) The Economics and Management of Water and Drainage in Agriculture. Kluwer Academic Publishers. Dordrecht, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, J. C. 2000. Nonparametric and semi-nonparametric recreational demand analysis. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 82:451–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, T. E. 2000. Status and trends of wetlands in the conterminous United States 1986 to 1997. U.S. Department of Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daily, G. (ed.) 1997. Nature’s Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems. Island Press, Washington, DC, USA and Covelo, CA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, P. A. and J. A. Hausman. 1994. Contingent valuation: is some number better than no number? Journal of Economic Perspectives 8:45–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doss, C. R. and S. J. Taff. 1996. The influence of wetland type and wetland proximity on residential property values. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 21:120–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Earnhart, D. 2001. Combining revealed and stated preferences methods to value environmental amenities at residential locations. Land Economics 77:12–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, G. M. and A. C. Fisher. 1987. Valuing the environment as input. Journal of Environmental Management 25:149–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farber, S. and R. Costanza. 1987. The economic value of wetlands systems. Journal of Environmental Management 24:41–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, A. M. 1991. Valuing environmental resources under alternative management regimes. Ecological Economics 3:247–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, A. M. 1993. The Measurement of Environmental and Resource Values. Resources for the Future, Washington, DC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gan, C. and E. J. Luzar. 1993. A Conjoint Analysis of Waterfowl Hunting in Louisiana. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 25:36–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammack, J. and G. M. Brown, Jr. 1974. Waterfowl and Wetlands: Toward Bioeconomic Analysis. Resources for the Future/The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD, USA and London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammitt, J. K., J.-T. Liu, and J.-L. Liu. 2001. Contingent valuation of Taiwanese wetlands. Environmental and Development Economics 6:259–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanemann, W. M. 1994. Valuing the environment through contingent valuation. Journal of Economic Perspectives 8:19–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heimlich, R. E., K. D. Weibe, R. Claassen, R. Gadsy, and R. M. House. 1998. Wetlands and agriculture: private interests and public benefits. U.S.D.A. Economic Research Service, Washington, DC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hey, D. L. and N. S. Phillippi. 1995. Flood reduction through wetland restoration: the upper Mississippi as a case study. Restoration Ecology 3:4–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoehn, J. P., F. Lupi, and M. D. Kaplowitz. 2002. The economic equivalency of drained and restored wetlands in Michigan. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 84:1355–1361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, R. J., G. Magnusson, M. J. Mazotta, and J. J. Opaluch. 2002. Combining economic and ecological indicators to prioritize salt marsh restoration actions. American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 84:1362–1370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kazmierczak, R. Jr. 2001. Economic linkages between coastal wetlands and water quality: a review of the value estimates reported in the published literature. Department of Agricultural Economics and Agribusiness, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, D. 1998. The dollar value of wetlands: trap set, bait taken, don’t swallow. National Wetlands Newsletter 20:7–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knutson, M., J. R. Sauer, D. A. Olsen, M. J. Mossman, L. M. Hemesath, and M. J. Lannoo. 1999. Effects of landscape composition and wetland fragmentation on frog and toad abundance and species richness in Iowa and Wisconsin, USA. Conservation Biology 13:1437–1446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lant, C. L. and R. S. Roberts. 1990. Greenbelts in the cornbelt: riparian wetlands, intrinsic values and market failure. Environment and Planning 22:1375–1388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehtinen, R. M., S. M. Galatowitsch, and J. R. Tester. 1999. Consequences of habitat loss and fragmentation for wetland amphibian assemblages. Wetlands 19:1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lupi, F. Jr., T. Graham-Thomasi, and S. Taff. 1991. A hedonic approach to urban wetland valuation. Department of Applied Economics, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, USA. Staff paper P91–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynne, G. D., P. Conroy, and F. Prochaska. 1981. Economic valuation of marsh areas for marine protection. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 8:175–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahan, B. L., S. Polasky, and R. Adams. 2000. Valuing urban wetlands: a property price approach. Land Economics 76:100–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitsch, W. J. and J. G. Gosselink. 1993. Wetlands, second edition. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, M., J. Bennett, and R. Blamey. 1999. Valuing improved wetland quality using choice modeling. Water Resources Research 35:2805–2814.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mullarkey, D. J. and R. C. Bishop. 1999. Sensitivity to scope: evidence from a CVM study of wetlands. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 81:1313.

    Google Scholar 

  • NRC (National Research Council). 1995. Understanding Marine Diversity: a Research Agenda for the Nation. The National Academy Press, Washington, DC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Odum, H. T. 1996. Environmental Accounting: Emergy and Environmental Accounting. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pate, J. and J. Loomis. 1997. The effect of distance on willingness to pay values: a case study of wetlands and salmon in California. Ecological Economics 20:199–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, J. E. and A. Regalado. 2002. The effects of wetlands and other factors on rural land values. Appraisal Journal 72:182–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sagoff, M. 1988. The Economy of the Earth: Philosophy, Law and the Environment. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shultz, S. and S. J. Taff. 2004. Implicit prices of wetland easements in areas of production agriculture. Land Economics 80. In press.

  • Spash, C. L. 2000. Ecosystems, contingent valuation and ethics: the case of wetland re-creation. Ecological Economics 34:195–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, T. H., S. Benin, and J. S. Larson. 1995. Public attitudes and economic values for wetland preservation in New England. Wetlands 15:226–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, T. H., J. Echeverria, R. J. Glass, T. Hager, and T. A. More. 1991. Measuring the existence value of wildlife: what do CVM estimates really show? Land Economics 67:390–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swallow, S. K. 1994. Renewable and non-renewable resource theory applied to coastal agriculture, forest, wetland and fishery linkages. Marine Resource Economics 9:291–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Vuuren, W. and P. Roy. 1993. Private and social returns from wetland preservation versus those from agriculture. Ecological Economics 8:289–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vileisis, A. 1997. Discovering the Unknown Landscape: a History of America’s Wetlands. Island Press, Washington, DC, USA and Covelo, CA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Haefen, R. H. and D. J. Phaneuf. 2003. Estimating preferences for outdoor recreation: a comparison of continuous and count data demand system framework. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 45:612–630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodward, R. T. and Y.-S. Wui. 2001. The economic value of wetland services: a meta-analysis. Ecological Economics 37:257–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zedler, J. B. 2000. Progress in wetland restoration ecology. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 15:402–405.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Agricultural Economics, Oklahoma State University, 74078, Stillwater, Oklahoma, USA

    Tracy Boyer

  2. Department of Applied Economics, University of Minnesota, 55108, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA

    Stephen Polasky

Authors
  1. Tracy Boyer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Stephen Polasky
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tracy Boyer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Boyer, T., Polasky, S. Valuing urban wetlands: A review of non-market valuation studies. Wetlands 24, 744–755 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1672/0277-5212(2004)024[0744:VUWARO]2.0.CO;2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1672/0277-5212(2004)024[0744:VUWARO]2.0.CO;2

Key Words

Search

Navigation