Skip to main content
Log in

Damage and repair classification in reinforced concrete beams using frequency domain data

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Materials and Structures Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This research aims at developing a new vibration-based damage classification technique that can efficiently be applied to a real-time large data. Statistical pattern recognition paradigm is relevant to perform a reliable site-location damage diagnosis system. By adopting such paradigm, the finite element and other inverse models with their intensive computations, corrections and inherent inaccuracies can be avoided. In this research, a two-stage combination between principal component analysis (PCA) and Karhunen–Loéve Transformation (also known as canonical correlation analysis) was proposed as a statistical-based damage classification technique. Vibration measurements from frequency domain were tested as possible damage-sensitive features. The performance of the proposed system was tested and verified on real vibration measurements collected from five laboratory-scale reinforced concrete beams modelled with various ranges of defects. The results of the system helped in distinguishing between normal and damaged patterns in structural vibration data. Most importantly, the system further dissected reasonably each main damage group into subgroups according to their severity of damage. Its efficiency was conclusively proved on data from both frequency response functions and response-only functions. The outcomes of this two-stage system showed a realistic detection and classification and outperform results from the PCA-only. The success of this classification model is substantially tenable because the observed clusters come from well-controlled and known state conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Al-Ghalib AA (2013) Damage and repair identification in RC beams modelled with various damage scenarios using vibration data. PhD Thesis, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham

  2. Carden P, Brownjohn J (2008) ARMA modelled time-series classification for structural health monitoring of civil infrastructure. Mech Syst Signal Process 22:295–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Carden EP, Fanning P (2004) Vibration based condition monitoring: a review. J Struct Health Monit 3(4):355–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Doebling SW, Farrar CR, Prime MB, Shevitz DW (1996) Damage identification and health monitoring of structural and mechanical systems from changes in their vibration characteristics: a literature review. Technical Report LA-13070-MS. Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos

  5. Doebling S, Farrar C, Prime M (1998) A summary review of vibration-based damage identification methods. Shock Vib Dig 30(2):91–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Farrar C, Duffey T (1999) Vibration based damage detection in rotating machinery and comparison to civil engineering applications. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on damage assessment of structures, DAMAS’99, Dublin, Ireland

  7. Farrar C, Worden K (2007) An introduction to structural health monitoring. Philos Trans R Soc 365:303–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Farrar C, Doebling S, Nix D (2001) Vibration-based structural damage identification. Philos Trans R Soc 359:131–149

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Figueiredo E, Park G, Figueriras J, Farrar C, Worden K (2009) Structural health monitoring algorithm comprises using standard data sets. Report LA-14393. Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos

  10. Friswell MI, Penny JET (1997) Is damage location using vibration measurements practical? Structural damage assessment using advanced signal processing procedures. In: Proceedings of DAMAS’97, Sheffield, UK, pp 351–362

  11. Jolliffe IT (2002) Principal component analysis, 2nd edn. Springer, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Maia NMM, Silva JM, He J, Lieven NAJ, Lin RM, Skingle GW, To W-M, Urgueira APV (1997) In: Maia NMM, Silva JM (eds) Theoretical and experimental modal analysis. Research Studies Press Ltd., Taunton

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sohn H, Farrar CR (2001) Damage diagnosis using time series analysis of vibration signals. J Smart Mater Struct 10:446–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sohn H, Farrar C, Hunter H, Worden K (2001) Applying the LANL statistical pattern recognition paradigm for structural health monitoring to data from a surface-effect fast patrol boat. Technical Report LA-13761-MS. Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos

  15. Sohn H, Farrar CR, Hemez FM, Shunk DD, Stinemates DW, Nadler BR, Czarnecki JJ (2004) A review of structural health monitoring literature: 1996–2001. Technical Report LA-13976-MS. Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos

  16. Webb A (2002) Statistical pattern recognition, 2nd edn. Wiley, West Sussex

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Wenzel H (2009) Health monitoring of bridges. Wiley, West Sussex

    Book  Google Scholar 

  18. Worden K, Dulieu-Barton JM (2004) An overview of intelligent fault detection in systems and structures. J Struct Health Monit 3(1):85–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ali A. Al-Ghalib.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Al-Ghalib, A.A., Mohammad, F.A. Damage and repair classification in reinforced concrete beams using frequency domain data. Mater Struct 49, 1893–1903 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-015-0621-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-015-0621-7

Keywords

Navigation