Materials and Structures

, Volume 45, Issue 12, pp 1761–1791

Round Robin Test for composite-to-brick shear bond characterization

  • Maria Rosa Valluzzi
  • Daniel V. Oliveira
  • Angelo Caratelli
  • Giulio Castori
  • Marco Corradi
  • Gianmarco de Felice
  • Enrico Garbin
  • David Garcia
  • Leire Garmendia
  • Ernesto Grande
  • Ugo Ianniruberto
  • Arkadiusz Kwiecień
  • Marianovella Leone
  • Gian Piero Lignola
  • Paulo B. Lourenço
  • Marialaura Malena
  • Francesco Micelli
  • Matteo Panizza
  • Catherine G. Papanicolaou
  • Andrea Prota
  • Elio Sacco
  • Thanasis C. Triantafillou
  • Alberto Viskovic
  • Bogusław Zając
  • Gina Zuccarino
RILEM TECHNICAL COMMITTEE

DOI: 10.1617/s11527-012-9883-5

Cite this article as:
Valluzzi, M.R., Oliveira, D.V., Caratelli, A. et al. Mater Struct (2012) 45: 1761. doi:10.1617/s11527-012-9883-5

Abstract

The paper presents the experience of a working group within the RILEM Technical Committee 223-MSC ‘Masonry Strengthening with Composite materials’, aimed at developing a standardized, reliable procedure for characterizing the bonding mechanism of masonry elements strengthened with composite materials under shear actions. Twelve laboratories from European universities and research centers were involved. Two different set-ups were compared, for single-lap and double-lap shear tests (the latter in two versions). Four kinds of fiber fabrics, i.e., glass, carbon, basalt and steel, were applied with epoxy resins (wet lay-up system) to clay brick units, for a total of 280 monotonic tests. The results provided information regarding the response of externally bonded-to-brick composites in terms of observed failure mechanisms, load capacity, effective transfer length, and bond shear stress–slip behavior. The test results of the 12 laboratories constitute a set of statistically representative data which may conveniently be used for setting appropriate design provisions and guidelines.

Keywords

MasonryBondClay brickFRPSRPShear test

Copyright information

© RILEM 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maria Rosa Valluzzi
    • 1
  • Daniel V. Oliveira
    • 2
  • Angelo Caratelli
    • 3
  • Giulio Castori
    • 4
  • Marco Corradi
    • 4
  • Gianmarco de Felice
    • 5
  • Enrico Garbin
    • 13
  • David Garcia
    • 6
  • Leire Garmendia
    • 6
  • Ernesto Grande
    • 7
  • Ugo Ianniruberto
    • 3
  • Arkadiusz Kwiecień
    • 8
  • Marianovella Leone
    • 9
  • Gian Piero Lignola
    • 10
  • Paulo B. Lourenço
    • 2
  • Marialaura Malena
    • 5
  • Francesco Micelli
    • 9
  • Matteo Panizza
    • 13
  • Catherine G. Papanicolaou
    • 11
  • Andrea Prota
    • 10
  • Elio Sacco
    • 7
  • Thanasis C. Triantafillou
    • 11
  • Alberto Viskovic
    • 12
  • Bogusław Zając
    • 8
  • Gina Zuccarino
    • 12
  1. 1.Department of Civil, Environmental and Architectural EngineeringUniversity of PadovaPaduaItaly
  2. 2.Department of Civil Engineering, ISISEUniversity of MinhoGuimaraesPortugal
  3. 3.Department of Civil EngineeringUniversity of Roma Tor VergataRomeItaly
  4. 4.Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringUniversity of PerugiaPerugiaItaly
  5. 5.Department of StructuresUniversity Roma TreRomeItaly
  6. 6.Tecnalia Research & InnovationBilbaoSpain
  7. 7.Department of Civil and Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of Cassino and Southern LazioCassinoItaly
  8. 8.Faculty of Civil EngineeringCracow University of TechnologyCracowPoland
  9. 9.Department of Engineering for InnovationUniversity of SalentoLecceItaly
  10. 10.Department of Structural EngineeringUniversity of Naples “Federico II”NaplesItaly
  11. 11.Department of Civil EngineeringUniversity of PatrasPatrasGreece
  12. 12.Department of Engineering and GeologyUniversity of Chieti-Pescara “G. D’Annunzio”PescaraItaly
  13. 13.Department of Civil, Environmental and Architectural EngineeringUniversity of PadovaPaduaItaly