Skip to main content
Log in

Web links and gender in science: An exploratory analysis

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Gender inequalities are prevalent in science despite many initiatives to try to eradicate them. Given the deep-rooted and complex nature of these inequalities there is a continuing need for research into their causes and manifestations. This study analyses one aspect of web communication, hyperlinks, to explore whether they are a potential source of insights into gender differences in this important scientific communication medium. A study of links to life sciences research groups in nine European found little evidence of gender differences, except in Germany. As a consequence, it is argued that hyperlinks are not a promising source of quantitative information about gender differences in communication strategies or online visibility, at least for senior researchers or research groups.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abir-Am, P., Outram, D. (1986), Uneasy Careers and Intimate Lives. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakanic, V., McPhail, C., Simon, R. J. (1987), The manuscript review and decision-making process. American Sociological Review, 52: 631–642.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barabási, A. L., Albert, R. (1999), Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science, 286: 509–512.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Bar-Ilan, J. (2004), A microscopic link analysis of academic institutions within a country — the case of Israel. Scientometrics, 59(3): 391–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bar-Ilan, J. (2005), What do we know about links and linking? A framework for studying links in academic environments. Information Processing & Management, 41(3): 973–986.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barjak, F. (2004), The integration of the Internet into informal communication in science. University of Applied Sciences Solothurn Discussion Paper No. 2004-W02, Retrieved May 23, 2005, from: http://www.fhso.ch/pdf/publikationen/dp2004-2002.pdf

  • Barjak, F. (2006, in press), From the “analogue divide” to the “hybrid divide”: the internet does not ensure equality of access to information in science. In: C. Hine (Ed.), New Infrastructures for Knowledge Production: Understanding e-Science. Hershey, PA: Idea Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barjak, F., Li, X., Thelwall, M. (2005), Which factors explain the web impact of scientists’ personal home pages? Presentation at Internet Research 6.0: Internet Generations, Retrieved September 9, 2005, from: http://conferences.aoir.org/viewabstract.php?id=117&cf=113

  • Barnett, R. C. (1975), Sex differences and age trends in occupational preference and occupational prestige. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 22(1): 35–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bordons, M., Morillo, F., Fernández, M. T., Gómez, I. (2003), One step further in the production of bibliometric indicators at the micro level: Differences by gender and professional category of scientists. Scientometrics, 57(2): 159–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Budd, J. M., Connaway, L. S. (1997), University faculty and networked information: Results of a survey. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 48: 834–852.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1996), Computer mediated communication and publication productivity among faculty. Internet Research: Electronic Networking Applications and Policy, 6(2/3): 41–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EC (2003), She figures 2003. Women and science — Statistics and indicators. Brussels: European Commission (Retrieved September 9, 2005, from: http://europa.eu.int/comm/research/science-society/pdf/she_figures_2003.pdf)

  • Etzkowitz, H., Kemelgor, C., Uzzi, B. (2000), Athena Unbound: The Advancement of Women in Science and Technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fry, J., Talja, S. (2004), The Cultural Shaping of Scholarly Communication: Explaining e-Journal Use within and across Academic Fields. Proceedings of the 67th ASIST Annual Meeting (pp. 20-30).

  • Herring, S. (1996), Posting in a different voice: gender and ethics in computer-mediated communication. In: P. Mayer (Ed.), Computer Media and Communication: A Reader, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 241–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hullmann, A. (2002), Bibliometric and patent indicators by gender: Is it feasible? Retrieved September 9, 2005, from: http:/www.cordis.lu/indicators/publications.htm

  • Ingwersen, P. (1998), The calculation of Web Impact Factors. Journal of Documentation, 54(2): 236–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiesling, S. (2003), Prestige, cultural models, norms & gender. In: J. Holmes, M. Meyerhoff (Eds), The Handbook of Language and Gender. Oxford: Backwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kling, R., McKim, G. (2000), Not just a matter of time: Field differences and the shaping of electronic media in supporting scientific communication. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51(14): 1306–1320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knorr-Cetina, K. (1999). Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences make Knowledge. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kretschmer, H., Kretschmer, T., Kretschmer, U. (2005a), Visibility of collaboration between immunology institutions on the web including aspects of gender studies. Proceedings of ISSI2005, 750-760.

  • Kretschmer, H., Kretschmer, U., Kretschmer, T. (2005b), Reflection of co-authorship networks in the web: Web hyperlinks versus web visibility rates. Proceedings of the 5th Triple Helix Conference, Turin, It, May 18–21, (CD-ROM).

  • LaFollete, M. (1988), Eyes on the stars: Images of women scientists in popular magazines. Science, Technology and Human Values, 13(3&4): 262–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, N. J. (1999). Why are there so few women in science? Nature, Retrieved September 9, 2005, from: http://www.nature.com/nature/debates/women/women_frameset.html

  • Leta, J., Lewison, G. (2003), The contribution of women in Brazilian science: A case study in astronomy, immunology and oceanography. Scientometrics, 57(3): 339–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, X., Thelwall, M., Musgrove, P. B., Wilkinson, D. (2003), The relationship between the WIFs or Inlinks of computer science departments in UK and their RAE ratings or research productivities in 2001. Scientometrics, 57(2): 239–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McElhinny, B. (2003), Theorizing gender in sociolinguistics and linguistic anthropology. In: J. Holmes, M. Meyerhoff (Eds), The Handbook of Language and Gender, Oxford: Backwell, pp. 21–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, H., Arnold, J. (2001), Breaking away from grounded identity? Women academics on the Web. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 4(1): 95–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitra, A., Hazen, M. D., LaFrance, B., Rogan, R. G. (1999), Faculty use and non-use of electronic mail: Attitudes, expectations and profiles. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 4 (3), Retrieved 24 August, 2002, from http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol2004/issue2003/mitra.html

  • Naldi, F., Luzi, D., Valente, A., Parenti, I. V. (2004), Scientific and technological performance by gender. In: H. F. Moed (Ed.), Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 299–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naldi, F., Parenti, I. V. (2002), Biosoft sas: Bibliometric and patent indicators by gender: Two feasibility studies (November 2002): Volume 1: Statistics, Volume 2: Methodology. Retrieved September 9, 2005, from: http:/www.cordis.lu/indicators/publications.htm

  • Nentwich, M. (2003). Cyberscience: Research in the Age of the Internet. Vienna: Austrian Academy of Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oldham, G., Achmad, S. (1999), Gender mainstreaming in science and technology — a global report. Nature, Retrieved September 9, 2005, from: http://www.nature.com/nature/debates/women/women_frameset.html

  • Pardue, M.-L., Hopkins, N., Potter, M. C., Ceyer, S. (1999), Moving from discrimination at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Nature, Retrieved September 9, 2005, from: http://www.nature.com/nature/debates/women/women_frameset.html

  • Randle, V. (1999), Is the glass ceiling an illusion? Nature, http://www.nature.com/nature/debates/women/women_frameset.html

  • Rosser, S., Zieseniss, M. (2000), Career issues and laboratory climates: different challenges and opportunities for women engineers and scientists (survey of fiscal year 1997 POWRE awardees). Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 6(2): 95–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, R. (1997), Sitations: an exploratory study. Cybermetrics,1(1), Retrieved September 9, 2005, from: http://www.cindoc.csic.es/cybermetrics/articles/v1i1p1.html

  • Sandler, B. R. (1996), The classroom climate: Still a chilly one for women. In: K. B. Costello (Ed.), Gendered Voices:Readings from the American Experience, Fort Worth: TX: Harcourt Brace College Publishers, pp. 359–367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. G. (1999), A tale of two web spaces; comparing sites using Web Impact Factors. Journal of Documentation, 55(5): 577–592.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang, R., Thelwall, M. (2003), US academic departmental web-site interlinking in the United States disciplinary differences. Library and Information Science Research, 25(4): 437–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teo, T. S. H. (2001), Demographic and motivation variables associated with Internet usage activities. Internet Research: Electronic Networking and Applications and Policy, 11(2): 125–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thelwall, M. (2004), Link Analysis: An Information Science Approach. San Diego: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thelwall, M., Harries, G. (2004), Do better scholars’ Web publications have significantly higher online impact? Journal of American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55(2): 149–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thelwall, M., Wilkinson, D. (2003), Graph structure in three national academic Webs: Power laws with anomalies. Journal of American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(8): 706–712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO (2003), International Handbook of Universities, 17th ed (International Association of Universities). Bath: Bath Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, J. P., Kucker, S., Maloney, N., Gabbay, S. (2000), Connecting minds: CMC and scientific work. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51: 1295–1305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, D., Harries, G., Thelwall, M., Price, E. (2003), Motivations for academic Web site interlinking: Evidence for the Web as a novel source of information on informal scholarly communication. Journal of Information Science, 29(1): 49–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Y. (2001), Scholarly use of internet-based electronic resources. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52: 628–654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mike Thelwall.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Thelwall, M., Barjak, F. & Kretschmer, H. Web links and gender in science: An exploratory analysis. Scientometrics 67, 373–383 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1556/Scient.67.2006.3.3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/Scient.67.2006.3.3

Keywords

Navigation