Abstract
Gender inequalities are prevalent in science despite many initiatives to try to eradicate them. Given the deep-rooted and complex nature of these inequalities there is a continuing need for research into their causes and manifestations. This study analyses one aspect of web communication, hyperlinks, to explore whether they are a potential source of insights into gender differences in this important scientific communication medium. A study of links to life sciences research groups in nine European found little evidence of gender differences, except in Germany. As a consequence, it is argued that hyperlinks are not a promising source of quantitative information about gender differences in communication strategies or online visibility, at least for senior researchers or research groups.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abir-Am, P., Outram, D. (1986), Uneasy Careers and Intimate Lives. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
Bakanic, V., McPhail, C., Simon, R. J. (1987), The manuscript review and decision-making process. American Sociological Review, 52: 631–642.
Barabási, A. L., Albert, R. (1999), Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science, 286: 509–512.
Bar-Ilan, J. (2004), A microscopic link analysis of academic institutions within a country — the case of Israel. Scientometrics, 59(3): 391–403.
Bar-Ilan, J. (2005), What do we know about links and linking? A framework for studying links in academic environments. Information Processing & Management, 41(3): 973–986.
Barjak, F. (2004), The integration of the Internet into informal communication in science. University of Applied Sciences Solothurn Discussion Paper No. 2004-W02, Retrieved May 23, 2005, from: http://www.fhso.ch/pdf/publikationen/dp2004-2002.pdf
Barjak, F. (2006, in press), From the “analogue divide” to the “hybrid divide”: the internet does not ensure equality of access to information in science. In: C. Hine (Ed.), New Infrastructures for Knowledge Production: Understanding e-Science. Hershey, PA: Idea Group.
Barjak, F., Li, X., Thelwall, M. (2005), Which factors explain the web impact of scientists’ personal home pages? Presentation at Internet Research 6.0: Internet Generations, Retrieved September 9, 2005, from: http://conferences.aoir.org/viewabstract.php?id=117&cf=113
Barnett, R. C. (1975), Sex differences and age trends in occupational preference and occupational prestige. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 22(1): 35–38.
Bordons, M., Morillo, F., Fernández, M. T., Gómez, I. (2003), One step further in the production of bibliometric indicators at the micro level: Differences by gender and professional category of scientists. Scientometrics, 57(2): 159–173.
Budd, J. M., Connaway, L. S. (1997), University faculty and networked information: Results of a survey. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 48: 834–852.
Cohen, J. (1996), Computer mediated communication and publication productivity among faculty. Internet Research: Electronic Networking Applications and Policy, 6(2/3): 41–63.
EC (2003), She figures 2003. Women and science — Statistics and indicators. Brussels: European Commission (Retrieved September 9, 2005, from: http://europa.eu.int/comm/research/science-society/pdf/she_figures_2003.pdf)
Etzkowitz, H., Kemelgor, C., Uzzi, B. (2000), Athena Unbound: The Advancement of Women in Science and Technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fry, J., Talja, S. (2004), The Cultural Shaping of Scholarly Communication: Explaining e-Journal Use within and across Academic Fields. Proceedings of the 67th ASIST Annual Meeting (pp. 20-30).
Herring, S. (1996), Posting in a different voice: gender and ethics in computer-mediated communication. In: P. Mayer (Ed.), Computer Media and Communication: A Reader, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 241–265.
Hullmann, A. (2002), Bibliometric and patent indicators by gender: Is it feasible? Retrieved September 9, 2005, from: http:/www.cordis.lu/indicators/publications.htm
Ingwersen, P. (1998), The calculation of Web Impact Factors. Journal of Documentation, 54(2): 236–243.
Kiesling, S. (2003), Prestige, cultural models, norms & gender. In: J. Holmes, M. Meyerhoff (Eds), The Handbook of Language and Gender. Oxford: Backwell.
Kling, R., McKim, G. (2000), Not just a matter of time: Field differences and the shaping of electronic media in supporting scientific communication. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51(14): 1306–1320.
Knorr-Cetina, K. (1999). Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences make Knowledge. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press.
Kretschmer, H., Kretschmer, T., Kretschmer, U. (2005a), Visibility of collaboration between immunology institutions on the web including aspects of gender studies. Proceedings of ISSI2005, 750-760.
Kretschmer, H., Kretschmer, U., Kretschmer, T. (2005b), Reflection of co-authorship networks in the web: Web hyperlinks versus web visibility rates. Proceedings of the 5th Triple Helix Conference, Turin, It, May 18–21, (CD-ROM).
LaFollete, M. (1988), Eyes on the stars: Images of women scientists in popular magazines. Science, Technology and Human Values, 13(3&4): 262–275.
Lane, N. J. (1999). Why are there so few women in science? Nature, Retrieved September 9, 2005, from: http://www.nature.com/nature/debates/women/women_frameset.html
Leta, J., Lewison, G. (2003), The contribution of women in Brazilian science: A case study in astronomy, immunology and oceanography. Scientometrics, 57(3): 339–353.
Li, X., Thelwall, M., Musgrove, P. B., Wilkinson, D. (2003), The relationship between the WIFs or Inlinks of computer science departments in UK and their RAE ratings or research productivities in 2001. Scientometrics, 57(2): 239–255.
McElhinny, B. (2003), Theorizing gender in sociolinguistics and linguistic anthropology. In: J. Holmes, M. Meyerhoff (Eds), The Handbook of Language and Gender, Oxford: Backwell, pp. 21–42.
Miller, H., Arnold, J. (2001), Breaking away from grounded identity? Women academics on the Web. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 4(1): 95–108.
Mitra, A., Hazen, M. D., LaFrance, B., Rogan, R. G. (1999), Faculty use and non-use of electronic mail: Attitudes, expectations and profiles. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 4 (3), Retrieved 24 August, 2002, from http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol2004/issue2003/mitra.html
Naldi, F., Luzi, D., Valente, A., Parenti, I. V. (2004), Scientific and technological performance by gender. In: H. F. Moed (Ed.), Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 299–314.
Naldi, F., Parenti, I. V. (2002), Biosoft sas: Bibliometric and patent indicators by gender: Two feasibility studies (November 2002): Volume 1: Statistics, Volume 2: Methodology. Retrieved September 9, 2005, from: http:/www.cordis.lu/indicators/publications.htm
Nentwich, M. (2003). Cyberscience: Research in the Age of the Internet. Vienna: Austrian Academy of Sciences.
Oldham, G., Achmad, S. (1999), Gender mainstreaming in science and technology — a global report. Nature, Retrieved September 9, 2005, from: http://www.nature.com/nature/debates/women/women_frameset.html
Pardue, M.-L., Hopkins, N., Potter, M. C., Ceyer, S. (1999), Moving from discrimination at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Nature, Retrieved September 9, 2005, from: http://www.nature.com/nature/debates/women/women_frameset.html
Randle, V. (1999), Is the glass ceiling an illusion? Nature, http://www.nature.com/nature/debates/women/women_frameset.html
Rosser, S., Zieseniss, M. (2000), Career issues and laboratory climates: different challenges and opportunities for women engineers and scientists (survey of fiscal year 1997 POWRE awardees). Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 6(2): 95–114.
Rousseau, R. (1997), Sitations: an exploratory study. Cybermetrics,1(1), Retrieved September 9, 2005, from: http://www.cindoc.csic.es/cybermetrics/articles/v1i1p1.html
Sandler, B. R. (1996), The classroom climate: Still a chilly one for women. In: K. B. Costello (Ed.), Gendered Voices:Readings from the American Experience, Fort Worth: TX: Harcourt Brace College Publishers, pp. 359–367.
Smith, A. G. (1999), A tale of two web spaces; comparing sites using Web Impact Factors. Journal of Documentation, 55(5): 577–592.
Tang, R., Thelwall, M. (2003), US academic departmental web-site interlinking in the United States disciplinary differences. Library and Information Science Research, 25(4): 437–458.
Teo, T. S. H. (2001), Demographic and motivation variables associated with Internet usage activities. Internet Research: Electronic Networking and Applications and Policy, 11(2): 125–137.
Thelwall, M. (2004), Link Analysis: An Information Science Approach. San Diego: Academic Press.
Thelwall, M., Harries, G. (2004), Do better scholars’ Web publications have significantly higher online impact? Journal of American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55(2): 149–159.
Thelwall, M., Wilkinson, D. (2003), Graph structure in three national academic Webs: Power laws with anomalies. Journal of American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(8): 706–712.
UNESCO (2003), International Handbook of Universities, 17th ed (International Association of Universities). Bath: Bath Press.
Walsh, J. P., Kucker, S., Maloney, N., Gabbay, S. (2000), Connecting minds: CMC and scientific work. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51: 1295–1305.
Wilkinson, D., Harries, G., Thelwall, M., Price, E. (2003), Motivations for academic Web site interlinking: Evidence for the Web as a novel source of information on informal scholarly communication. Journal of Information Science, 29(1): 49–56.
Zhang, Y. (2001), Scholarly use of internet-based electronic resources. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52: 628–654.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Thelwall, M., Barjak, F. & Kretschmer, H. Web links and gender in science: An exploratory analysis. Scientometrics 67, 373–383 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1556/Scient.67.2006.3.3
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/Scient.67.2006.3.3