Article

Sexuality Research & Social Policy

, Volume 2, Issue 2, pp 23-30

Medical vectors: Surgical HIV transmission and the location of culpability

  • Catherine WaldbyAffiliated withSchool of Sociology and Anthropology, University of New South Wales Email author 
  • , Annette HoulihanAffiliated withGriffith Law School, Nathan Campus, Griffith University
  • , June CrawfordAffiliated withNational Centre in HIV Social Research, University of New South Wales
  • , Susan KippaxAffiliated withNational Centre in HIV Social Research, University of New South Wales

Rent the article at a discount

Rent now

* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.

Get Access

Abstract

This paper investigates the first documented case of non-transfusion-related surgical HIV transmission in a developed country, Australia. In 1989, four women were infected with HIV as a result of surgical procedures in a private clinic. A subsequent medical tribunal failed to establish medical negligence or a failure of infection control procedures on the part of the surgeon. We use this case to interrogate some of the assumptions about human culpability that feature in both HIV epidemiology and criminal law approaches to HIV transmission. We argue that these models for explaining viral spread overestimate the role of human agency and underestimate the importance of anonymous, contingent, material relations between viruses, bodies, and technologies. We suggest that the medical tribunal model, with its implicit recognition of viral agency and the impossibility of eliminating risk, offers an alternative model of justice to the criminal justice system, with its exclusive focus on human agency.

Keywords

HIV transmission medical technology epidemiology criminal law human intention