Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Twenty years of trials, tribulations, and research progress in bioethanol technology

Selected key events along the way

  • Published:
Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The projected cost of ethanol production, from cellulosic biomass has been reduced by almost a factor of four over the last 20 yr. Thus, it is now competitive for blending with gasoline, and several companies are working to build the first plants. However, technology development faced challenges at all levels. Because the benefits of bioethanol were not well understood, it was imperative to clarify and differentiate its attributes. Process engineering was invaluable in focusing on promising opportunities for improvements, particularly in light of budget reductions, and in tracking progress toward a competitive goal. Now it is vital for one or more commercial projects to besuccessful, and improving our understanding of process fundamentals will reduce the time and costs for commercialization. Additionally, the cost of bioethanol, must be cut further to be competitive as a pure fuel in the open market, and aggressive technology advances are required to meet this target.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wyman, C. E., ed. (1996), Handbook on Bioethanol: Production and Utilization, Applied Energy Technology Series, Taylor & Francis, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Wyman, C. E. (1995), Bioresour. Technol. 50, 3–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lynd, L. R., Cushman, J. H., Nichols, R. J., and Wyman, C. E. (1991), Science 251, 1318–1323.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Wyman, C. E. (1999), Annu. Rev. Energy Environ. 24, 189–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Harris, E. E. and Beglinger, E. (1946), Ind. Eng. Chem. 38(9), 890–895.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Ingram, L. O., Conway, T., Clark, D. P., Sewell, G. W., and Preston, J. F. (1987), Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 53, 2420–2425.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Wyman, C. E. (1994), Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 45/46, 897–915.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Tyson, K. S. (1993), Fuel Cycle Evaluations of Biomass-Ethanol and Reformulated Gasoline, vol. 1, NREL/TP-463-4950, DE94000227, National Rene wable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO.

    Google Scholar 

  9. US Department of Energy (1993), Technical Report 11, DOE/EP-0004, US Department of Energy, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hinman, N. D., Schell, D. J., Rilev, C. J., Bergeron, P. W., and Walter, P. J. (1992), Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 34/35, 639–649.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wooley, R., Ruth, M., Glassner, D., and Sheehan, J. (1999), Biotech. Prog. 15 794–803.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Beck, R. J. (1997), Worldwide Petroleum Industry Outlook: 1998–2002 Projections to 2007, 14th ed., Pennwell, Tulsa, OK.

    Google Scholar 

  13. US Department of Energy (1998), Report DOE/EIA-0384(97), Energy Information Administration, US Department of Energy, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Potts, L. W. (1998), Ethanol: Collins Pine Steps up to New Development Idea, Chester Progressive, Chester, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lynd, L. R. (1996), Annu. Rev. Energy Environ. 21, 403–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bailey, B. K. (1996), Performance of ethanol as a transportation fuel.-om Ref. 1, Applied Energy Technology Series, Taylor & Francis, Washington, DC. p. 37–58.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Yergin, D. (1991), The Prize: Simon & Schuster, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Chem Systems Inc. (1985), Report ZX-3-03098-1 Solar Energy Research Institute, Golden, CO.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Nystrom, J. M., Greenwald C. G., Hagler, R. W., and Stahr, J. J. (1985), NYSERDA Report No. 85-9, New York State Research and Development Authority, Albany.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Stone and Wesbster Engineering Corporation (1985), Report ZX-3-03096-1, Solar Energy Research Institute, Golden, CO.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Stone and Webster Engineering Corporation (1985), Report ZX-3-03097-1, Solar Energy Research Institute, Golden, CO.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Wright, J. D. and Power, A. J. (1985), Biotechnol. Bioeng. Symp. 15, 511–532.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Wright, J. D. and D'Agincourt, C. G. (1984), Biotechnol. Bioeng. Symp. 14, 105–123.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Wright, J. D. (1988), Chem. Eng. Prog. 62–74.

  25. Wright, J. D. (1988), Energy Prog. 8(2), 71–78.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Hsu, T.-A. (1996),Ref. 1. pp. 179–195.

    Google Scholar 

  27. McMillan, J. D. (1994), in Enzymatic Conversion of Biomass for Fuels Production, ACS Symposium Series, 566, Himmel, M. E., Baker, J. O., and Overend, R. P., eds., American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, pp. 292–324.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Converse, A. O., Kwarteng, I. K., Grethlein, H. E., and Ooshima, H. (1989), Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 20/21, 63–78.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Knappert, H., Grethlein, H., and Converse, A. (1980), Biotechnol. Bioeng. Symp. 11, 67–77.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Schell, D., Torget, R., Power, A., Walter, P. J., Grohmann, K., and Hinman, N. D. (1991), Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 28/29, 87–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Torget, R., Walter, P., Himmel, M., and Grohmann, K. (1991), Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 28/29, 75–86.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Grohmann, K., Himmel, M., Rivard, C., Tucker, M., and Baker, J. (1984), Biotechnol. Bioeng. Symp. 14, 137–157.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Lynd, L. R., Elander, R. T., and Wyman, C. E. (1996), Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 57/58, 741–761.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Parker, S., Calnon, M., Feinberg, D., Power, A., and Weissl, L. (1983), ReportSERI/TR-231-2000, DE84000007, Solar Energy Research Institute, Golden, CO.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Ingram, L. O., Conway, T., and Alterthum, F. (1991), US Patent 5000,000.

  36. Wood, B. E. and Ingram, L. O. (1992), Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 58(7), 2103–2110.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Reese, E. T. (1976), Biotechnol. Bioeng. Symp. 6, 9–20.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Montencourt, B. S., Kelleher, T. J., and Eveleigh, D. E. (1980), Biotechnol. Bioeng. Symp. 10, 15–26.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Wyman, C. E., Spindler, D. D., Grohmann, K., and Lastick, S. M. (1996), Biotechnol. Bioeng. 17, 221–238.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Spindler, D. D., Wyman, C. E., Grohmann, K., and Mohagheghi, A. (1988), Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 21, 529–540.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Spindler, D. D., Wyman, C. E., Grohmann, K., and Philippidis, G. P. (1992), Biotechnol. Lett. 14(5), 403–407.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Spindler, D. D., Wyman, C. E., Mohagheghi, A., and Grohmann, K. (1987), Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 17, 279–293.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Spindler, D. D., Wyman, C. E., and Grohmann, K. (1989), Biotechnol. Bioeng. 34(2), 189–195.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Emert, G. H., Katzen, R., Fredrickson, R. E., and Kaupisch, K. F. (1980), Chem. Eng. Prog. 76(9), 47–52.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Emert, G. H. and Katzen, R. (1980), Chemtech 610–614.

  46. Takagi, M., Abe, S., Suzuki, S., Emert, G. H., and Yata, N. (1977), in Proceedings of the Bioconversion Symposium, Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi, pp. 551–571.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Gauss, W. F., Suzuki, S., and Takagi, M. (1976), US Patent no. 3,990,944.

  48. Kadam, K. L. (1996), Cellulase production,Ref. 1,. pp. 213–252.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Hettenhaus, J. R. and Glassner, D. (1997), Enzyme Hydrolysis of Cellulose: Short-Term Commercialization Prospects for Conversion of Lignocellulosics to Ethanol, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Himmel, M. E., Ruth, M. F., and Wyman, C. E. (1999), Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 10(4) 358–364.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Mohagheghi, A., Grohmann, K., and Wyman, C. E. (1990), Biotechnol. Bioeng. 35, 211–216.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Mohagheghi, A., Grohmann, K., and Wyman, C. E. (1987), Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 17, 263–277.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Schell, D. J., Hinman, N. D., and Wyman, C. E. (1990), Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 24/25, 287–297.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Wyman, C. E. (1995), in Enzymatic Degradation of Insoluble Carbohydrates, ACS Symposium Series 618, Saddler, J. N. and Penner, M. H., eds., American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, pp. 272–290.

    Google Scholar 

  55. van Walsum, G. P., Allen, S. G., Spencer, M. J., Laser, M. S., Antal, M. J., and Lynd, L. R. (1996), Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 57/58, 157–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Lynd, L. R., Wyman, C. E., and Gerngross, T. U. (1999), Biotechnol. Prog. 15, 777–793.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Wyman, C. E. (1990), Biological Production of Chemicals from Renewable Feedstocks, National Meeting, American Chemical Society, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  58. McCoy, M. (1998), Chem. Eng. News 76(49), December 7, 29–32.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Lugar, R. G. and Woolsey, R. J. (1999), Foreign Affairs 78(1), 88–102.

    Google Scholar 

  60. National Research Council (1999), Review of the Research Strategy for Biomass-Derived Transportation Fuels, National Academy Press, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  61. National Research Council (1999), Biobased Industrial Products: Research and Commercialization Priorities, National Academy Press, Washington DC.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Thayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, 8000 Cummings Hall, 03755, Hanover, NH

    Charles E. Wyman

Authors
  1. Charles E. Wyman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wyman, C.E. Twenty years of trials, tribulations, and research progress in bioethanol technology. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 91, 5–21 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1385/ABAB:91-93:1-9:5

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1385/ABAB:91-93:1-9:5

Index Entries

Search

Navigation