Subarachnoid hemorrhage grading scales
A systematic review
Cite this article as: Rosen, D.S. & MacDonald, R.L. Neurocrit Care (2005) 2: 110. doi:10.1385/NCC:2:2:110 Abstract
Numerous systems are reported for grading the clinical condition of patients following subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). The literature was reviewed for articles pertaining to the grading of such patients, including publications on the Hunt and Hess Scale, Fisher Scale, Glasgow Coma Score (GCS), and World Federation of Neurological Surgeons Scale. This article reviews the advantages and limitations of these scales as well as more recent proposals for other grading systems based on these scales with or without addition of other factors known to be prognostic for outcome after SAH. There remain substantial deficits in the literature regarding grading of patients with SAH. Most grading scales were derived retrospectively, and the intra- and interobserver variability has seldom been assessed. Inclusion of additional factors increases the complexity of the scale, possibly making it less likely to be adopted for routine usage and increasing (only marginally in some cases) the ability to predict prognosis. Until further data are available, it is recommended that publications on patients with SAH report at least the admission GCS as well as factors commonly known to influence prognosis, such as age, pre-existing hypertension, the amount of blood present on admission computed tomography, time of admission after SAH, aneurysm location and size, presence of intracerebral or intraventricular hemorrhage, and blood pressure at admission.
Key Words Subarachnoid hemorrhage grading system cerebral aneurysm Glasgow Coma Score References
Fox JL. Intracranial Aneurysms. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1983.
Bramwell E. The etiology of recurrent ocular paralysis (including periodic ocular paralysis and ophthalmoplegic migraine). Edinburgh Med J 1933;40:209–218.
Rosen DS, Macdonald RL. Grading of subarachnoid hemorrhage: modification of the world World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies scale on the basis of data for a large series of patients. Neurosurgery 2004;54:566–575.
Botterell EH, Lougheed WM, Scott JW, Vandewater SL. Hypothermia, and interruption of carotid, or carotid and vertebral circulation, in the surgical management of intracranial aneurysms. J Neurosurg 1956;13:1–42.
Nishioka H. Report on the cooperative study of intracranial aneurysms and subarachnoid hemorrhage. Section VII. I. Evaluation of the conservative management of ruptured intracranial aneurysms. J Neurosurg 1966;25:574–592.
Lindsay KW, Teasdale GM, Knill-Jones RP, Murray L. Assessment of the consequences of subarachnoid haemorrhage. Acta Neurochir 1982;63:59–64.
Hunt WE, Hess RM. Surgical risk as related to time of intervention in the repair of intracranial aneurysms. J Neurosurg 1968;28:14–20.
Hunt WE, Kosnik EJ. Timing and perioperative care in intracranial aneurysm surgery. Clin Neurosurg 1974;21:79–89.
Fisher CM, Kistler JP, Davis JM. Relation of cerebral vasospasm to subarachnoid hemorrhage visualized by computerized tomographic scanning. Neurosurgery 1980;6:1–9.
Teasdale G, Jennett B. Assessment of impaired consciousness and coma: a practical scale. Lancet 1974;2:81–84.
Drake CG, Hunt WE, Sano K, et al. Report of World Federation of Neurological Surgeons Committee on a universal subarachnoid hemorrhage grading scale. J Neurosurg 1988;68:985–986.
Cavanagh SJ, Gordon VL. Grading scales used in the management of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a critical review. J Neurosci Nurs 2002;34:288–295.
van Gijn J, Bromberg JE, Lindsay KW, Hasan D, Vermeulen M. Definition of initial grading, specific events, and overall outcome in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. A survey. Stroke 1994;25:1623–1627.
Gerber CJ, Lang DA, Neil-Dwyer G, Smith PW. A simple scoring system for accurate prediction of outcome within four days of a subarachnoid haemorrhage. Acta Neurochir 1993;122:11–22.
Gotoh O, Tamura A, Yasui N, Nihei H, Manaka S, Suzuki A et al. [Japan coma scale in the prediction of outcome after early surgery for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage]. [Japanese]. No to Shinkei 1995;47:49–55.
Gotoh O, Tamura A, Yasui N, Suzuki A, Hadeishi H, Sano K. Glasgow Coma Scale in the prediction of outcome after early aneurysm surgery. Neurosurgery 1996;39:19–24.
Hirai S, Ono J, Yamaura A. Clinical grading and outcome after early surgery in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurosurgery 1996;39:441–446.
Jagger J, Torner JC, Kassell NF. Neurologic assessment of subarachnoid hemorrhage in a large patient series. Surg Neurol 1989;32:327–333.
Ogilvy CS, Carter BS. A proposed comprehensive grading system to predict outcome for surgical management of intracranial aneurysms. Neurosurgery 1998;42:959–968.
Oshiro EM, Walter KA, Piantadosi S, Witham TF, Tamargo RJ. A new subarachnoid hemorrhage grading system based on the Glasgow Coma Scale: a comparison with the Hunt and Hess and World Federation of Neurological Surgeons Scales in a clinical series. Neurosurgery 1997;41:140–147.
Sato J, Masuzawa H, Shiraishi K, Kanazawa I, Kamitani H. [New clinical grading in ruptured cerebral aneurysm]. [Japanese]. No Shinkei Geka 1986;14:1183–1187.
Saveland H, Sonesson B, Ljunggren B, Brandt L, Uski T, Zygmunt S et al. Outcome evaluation following subarachnoid hemorrhage. J Neurosurg 1986;64:191–196.
Takagi K, Aoki M, Ishii T, et al. [Japan Coma Scale as a grading scale of subarachnoid hemorrhage: a way to determine the scale]. [Japanese]. No Shinkei Geka 1998;26:509–515.
Takagi K, Tamura A, Nakagomi T, et al. How should a subarachnoid hemorrhage grading scale be determined? A combinatorial approach based solely on the Glasgow Coma Scale. J Neurosurg 1999;90:680–687.
Claassen J, Kreiter KT, Kowalski RG, et al. Effect of acute physiologic derangements on outcome after subarachnoid hemorrhage. Crit Care Med 2004;32:832–838.
Hijdra A, Brouwers PJAM, Vermeulen M, van Gijn J. Grading the amount of blood on computed tomograms after subarachnoid hemorrhage. Stroke 1990;21:1156–1161.
Lindsay KW, Teasdale GM, Knill-Jones RP. Observer variability in assessing the clinical features of subarachnoid hemorrhage. J Neurosurg 1983;58:57–62.
Kassell NF, Torner JC, Haley EC, Jr., Jane JA, Adams HP, Kongable GL. The International Cooperative Study on the Timing of Aneurysm Surgery. Part 1: Overall management results. J Neurosurg 1990;73:18–36.
Aulmann C, Steudl WI, Feldmann U. [Validation of the prognostic accuracy of neurosurgical admission scales after rupture of cerebral aneurysms]. Zentralbl Neurochir 1998;59:171–180.
Proust F, Hannequin D, Langlois O, Freger P, Creissard P. Causes of morbidity and mortality after ruptured aneurysm surgery in a series of 230 patients. The importance of control angiography. Stroke 1995;26:1553–1557.
Yoshikai S, Nagata S, Ohara S, Yuhi F, Sakata S, Matsuno H. [A retrospective analysis of the outcomes of patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhages: a focus on the prognostic factors]. [Japanese]. No Shinkei Geka 1996;24:733–738.
Deruty R, Pelissou-Guyotat I, Mottolese C, Amat D, Bognar L. Level of consciousness and age as prognostic factors in aneurysmal SAH. Acta Neurochir 1995;132:1–8.
Kistler JP, Crowell RM, Davis KR, et al. The relation of cerebral vasospasm to the extent and location of subarachnoid blood visualized by CT scan: a prospective study. Neurology 1983;33:424–436.
Fujita S. Computed tomographic grading with Hounsfield number related to delayed vasospasm in cases of ruptured cerebral aneurysm. Neurosurgery 1985;17:609–612.
Inagawa T, Ohbayashi N, Kumano K. Effect of rapid spontaneous diminution of subarachnoid hemorrhage on cerebral vasospasm. Surg Neurol 1995;43:25–30.
Reilly C, Amidei C, Tolentino J, Jahromi BS, Macdonald RL. Clot volume and clearance rate as independent predictors of vasospasm after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. J Neurosurg 2004;101:255–261.
Choudhri TF, Hoh BL, Solomon RA. Editorial comment. Neurosurgery 1998;42:969.
Pal J, Brown R, Fleiszer D. The value of the Glasgow Coma Scale and Injury Severity Score: predicting outcome in multiple trauma patients with head injury. J Trauma 1989;29:746–748.
Rocca B, Martin C, Viviand X, Bidet PF, Saint-Gilles HL, Chevalier A. Comparison of four severity scores in patients with head trauma. J Trauma 1989;29:299–305.
Kennedy F, Gonzalez P, Dang C, Fleming A, Sterling-Scott R. The Glasgow Coma Scale and prognosis in gunshot wounds to the brain. J Trauma 1993;35:75–77.
Polin RS, Shaffrey ME, Phillips CD, Germanson T, Jane JA. Multivariate analysis and prediction of outcome following penetrating head injury. Neurosurg Clin N Am 1995;6:689–699.
Shaffrey ME, Polin RS, Phillips CD, Germanson T, Shaffrey CI, Jane JA. Classification of civilian craniocerebral gunshot wounds: a multivariate analysis predictive of mortality. J Neurotrauma 1992;9(Suppl 1):S279-S285.
Mase G, Zorzon M, Biasutti E, Tasca G, Vitrani B, Cazzato G. Immediate prognosis of primary intracerebral hemorrhage using an easy model for the prediction of survival. Acta Neurol Scand 1995;91:306–309.
Sacco RL, VanGool R, Mohr JP, Hauser WA. Nontraumatic coma. Glasgow coma score and coma etiology as predictors of 2-week outcome. Arch Neurol 1990;47:1181–1184.
Menegazzi JJ, Davis EA, Sucov AN, Paris PM. Reliability of the Glasgow Coma Scale when used by emergency physicians and paramedics. J Trauma 1993;34:46–48.
Teasdale G, Knill-Jones R, van der Knill-Jones SJ. Observer variability in assessing impaired consciousness and coma. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1978;41:603–610.
Rowley G, Fielding K. Reliability and accuracy of the Glasgow Coma Scale with experienced and inexperienced users. Lancet 1991;337:535–538.
Lagares A, Gomez PA, Lobato RD, Alen JF, Alday R, Campollo J. Prognostic factors on hospital admission after spontaneous subarachnoid haemorrhage. Acta Neurochir 2001;143:665–672.
Nishioka H. Evaluation of the conservative management of ruptured intracranial aneurysms. In: Sahs AL, Perret GE, Locksley HB, Nishioka H, eds. Intracranial Aneurysms and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage. Philadelphia: Lippincott, 1969, pp. 125–142.
Ogilvy CS, Carter BS. A proposed comprehensive grading system to predict outcome for surgical management of intracranial aneurysms. Neurosurgery 1998;42:959–970.
Kay A, Petzold A, Kerr M, Keir G, Thompson E, Nicoll J. Decreased cerebrospinal fluid apolipoprotein E after subarachnoid hemorrhage: correlation with injury severity and clinical outcome. Stroke 2003;34:637–642.
Raabe A, Grolms C, Keller M, Dohnert J, Sorge O, Seifert V. Correlation of computed tomography findings and serum brain damage markers following severe head injury. Acta Neurochir 1998;140:787–791.
Chiang VL, Claus EB, Awad IA. Toward more rational prediction of outcome in patients with high-grade subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurosurgery 2000;46:28–35.
Jennett B, Bond M. Assessment of outcome after severe brain damage. A practical scale. Lancet 1975;1:480–484.
Germanson TP, Lanzino G, Kongable GL, Torner JC, Kassell NF, and the participants. Risk classification after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Surg Neurol 1998;49:155–163.