Skip to main content
Log in

Patterns of nonresident father contact

  • Published:
Demography

Abstract

We used the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth 1979 cohort (NLSY79) from 1979 to 2002 and the Children of the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth (CNLSY) from 1986 to 2002 to describe the number, shape, and population frequencies of U.S. nonresident father contact trajectories over a 14-year period using growth mixture models. The resulting four-category classification indicated that nonresident father involvement is not adequately characterized by a single population with a monotonic pattern of declining contact over time. Contrary to expectations, about two-thirds of fathers were consistently either highly involved or rarely involved in their children’s lives. Only one group, constituting approximately 23% of fathers, exhibited a clear pattern of declining contact. In addition, a small group of fathers (8%) displayed a pattern of increasing contact. A variety ofvariables differentiated between these groups, including the child’s age at father-child separation, whether the child was born within marriage, the mother’s education, the mother’s age at birth, whether the father pays child support regularly, and the geographical distance between fathers and children.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amato, P.R., A. Booth, D.R. Johnson, and S.J. Rogers. 2007. Alone Together: How Marriage in America Is Changing. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amato, P.R. and J. Gilbreth. 1999. “Nonresident Fathers and Children’s Well-being: A Meta-Analysis.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 61: 557–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aquilino, W.S. 2006. “Noncustodial Father-Child Relationship From Adolescence Into Young Adulthood.” Journal of Marriage and Family 68: 929–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arditti, J.A. and T.Z. Keith. 1993. “Visitation Frequency, Child Support Payment, and the Father-Child Relationship Postdivorce.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 55: 699–712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barber, J. and A. Evans. 2006. “The Intersection Among Unintended, Premarital, and Teenage Child-bearing in the U.S.” Report 06-608. Population Studies Center, Ann Arbor, MI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartfeld, J. 2000. “Child Support and the Postdivorce Economic Well-being of Mothers, Fathers, and Children.” Demography 37: 203–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bollen, K.A. and P.J. Curran. 2006. Curve Models: A Structural Equation Perspective. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braver, S.L. and D. O’Connell. 1998. Divorced Dads: Shattering the Myths. New York: Tarcher Putnam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bumpass, L. 1990. “What’s Happening to the Family?: Interactions Between Demographic and Institutional Change.” Demography 27: 483–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, M., S. McLanahan, and P. England. 2004. “Union Formation in Fragile Families.” Demography 41: 237–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Center for Human Resources Research. 2004. “A Guide to the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth 1979.” Columbus, OH: The Ohio State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke-Steward, A. and C. Brentano. 2006. Divorce: Causes and Consequences. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooksey, E.C. and P.H. Craig. 1998. “Parenting From a Distance: The Effects of Paternal Characteristics on Contact Between Nonresidential Fathers and Their Children.” Demography 35: 187–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eggebeen, D.J. 2002. “The Changing Course of Fatherhood.” Journal of Family Issues 23: 486–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emery, R., K.M. Kitzmann, and M. Waldron. 1999. “Psychological Interventions for Separated and Divorced Families.” Pp. 323–44 in Coping With Divorce, Single Parenting, and Remarriage: A Risk and Resiliency Perspective, edited by E.M. Hetherington. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furstenberg, F.F., C.W. Nord, J.L. Peterson, and N. Zill. 1983. “The Life Course of Children of Divorce: Marital Disruption and Parental Contact.” American Sociological Review 48: 656–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hetherington, E.M. 1993. “An Overview of the Virginia Longitudinal Study of Divorce and Remarriage With a Focus on Early Adolescence.” Journal of Family Psychology 7: 39–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hetherington, E.M. and J. Kelly. 2002. For Better or for Worse: Divorce Reconsidered. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofferth, S.L., N. Cabrera, M. Carlson, R.L. Coley, R. Day, and H. Schindler. 2007. “Resident Father Involvement and Social Fathering.” Pp. 335–74 in Handbook of Measurement Issues in Family Research, edited by S.L. Hofferth and L.M. Casper. Mahway, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ihinger-Tallman, M., K. Pasley, and C. Buehler. 1993. “Developing a Middle-Range Theory of Father Involvement Postdivorce.” Journal of Family Issues 14: 550–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Juby, H., J.-M. Billette, B. Laplante, and C. Le Bourdais. 2007. “Nonresident Fathers and Children: Parents’ New Unions and Frequency of Contact.” Journal of Family Issues 28: 1220–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, V. 1994. “Variation in the Consequences of Nonresident Father Involvement for Children’s Well-being.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 56: 963–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, V., K.M. Harris, and H.E. Heard. 2004. “Racial and Ethnic Diversity in Nonresident Father Involvement.” Journal of Marriage and Family 66: 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, V. and H.E. Heard. 1999. “Nonresident Father Visitation, Parental Conflict, and Mother’s Satisfaction: What’s Best for Child Well-being?” Journal of Marriage and Family 61: 385–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamb, M.E. 1991. “Noncustodial Fathers and Their Impact on the Children of Divorce.” Pp. 105–25 in The Postdivorce Family: Children, Parenting, and Society, edited by R.A. Thompson and P.R. Amato. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landale, N.S. and R.S. Oropesa. 2001. “Father Involvement in the Lives of Mainland Puerto Rican Children: Contributions of Nonresident, Cohabiting and Married Fathers.” Social Forces 79: 945–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, F., T.E. Duncan, and S.C. Duncan. 2001. “Latent Growth Modeling of Longitudinal Data: A Finite Growth Mixture Modeling Approach.” Structural Equation Modeling 8: 493–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lo, Y., N.R. Mendell, and D.B. Rubin. 2001. “Testing the Number of Components in a Normal Mixture.” Biometrika 88: 767–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maccoby, E.E. and R.H. Mnookin. 1992. Dividing the Child: Social and Legal Dilemmas of Custody. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manning, W.D. and P.J. Smock. 1999. “New Families and Nonresident Father-Child Visitation.” Social Forces 78: 87–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manning, W.D., S.D. Stewart, and P.J. Smock. 2003. “The Complexity of Fathers’ Parenting Responsibilities and Involvement With Nonresident Children.” Journal of Family Issues 24: 645–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLanahan, S., I. Garfinkel, N. Reichman, J. Teitler, M. Carlson, and C. Ajudiger. 2003. “The Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study: Baseline National Report.” Bendheim-Thoman Center for Research on Child Well-Being, Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mott, F. 1990. “When Is a Father Really Gone? Paternal-Child Contact in Father-Absent Homes.” Demography 27: 499–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muthén, B.O. 2001. “Second-Generation Structural Equation Modeling With a Combination of Categorical and Continuous Latent Variables: New Opportunities for Latent Class/Latent Growth Modeling.” Pp. 291–322 in New Methods for the Analysis of Change, edited by L.M. Collins and A. Sayer. Washington, DC: APA.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • —. 2002. “Beyond SEM: General Latent Variable Modeling.” Behaviormetrika 29: 81–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 2004. “Latent Variable Analysis: Growth Mixture Modeling and Related Techniques for Longitudinal Data.” Pp. 345–68 in Handbook of Quantitative Methodology for the Social Sciences, edited by D. Kaplan. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muthén, L.K. and B.O. Muthén. 2006. Mplus User’s Guide: Fourth Edition. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagin, D. 2005. Group-Based Modeling of Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nepomnyaschy, L. 2007. “Child Support and Father-Child Contact: Testing Reciprocal Pathways.” Demography 44: 93–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nord, C. and N. Zill. 1996. “Noncustodial Parents’ Participation in Their Children’s Lives: Evidence From the Survey of Income and Program Participation, Vol. I: Summary of SIPP Analysis.” (DHHS-100-93-0012). U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nylund, K.L., T. Asparouhov, and B.O. Muthén. 2006. “Deciding on the Number of Classes in Latent Class Analysis and Growth Mixture Modeling. A Monte Carlo Simulation Study.” Structural Equation Modeling 14: 535–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, C., W.D. Manning, and P.J. Smock. 2007. “Married and Cohabiting Parents’ Relationship Stability: A Focus on Race and Ethnicity.” Journal of Marriage and Family 69: 1345–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parke, R.D. 1996. Fatherhood. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, J., N. Thoennes, L. Davis, J.C. Venohr, D.A. Price, and T. Griffith. 2003. “Office of Child Support Enforcement Responsible Fatherhood Programs: Client Characteristics and Program Outcomes.” Report. Available online at http://www.acf.dhhs.gov/programs/cse/pubs/2003/reports/ fatherhood_programs/responsible_fatherhood_programs.pdf.

  • Reichman, N.E., J.O. Teitler, I. Garfinkel, and S.S. McLanahan. 2001. “The Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study: Sample and Design.” Children and Youth Services Review 23: 303–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, P. 2006. “Update on the Marriage and Fatherhood Provisions of the 2006 Federal Budget.” Washington, DC: Center for Law and Social Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoen, R. and V. Canudas-Romo. 2006. “Timing Effects on Divorce: 20th Century Experience in the United States.” Journal of Marriage and Family 68: 749–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seltzer, J.A. 1991. “Relationships Between Fathers and Children Who Live Apart: The Father’s Role After Separation.” Journal of Marriage and Family 53: 79–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1998. “Fathers by Law: Effects of Joint Legal Custody on Nonresident Fathers’ Involvement With Children.” Demography 35: 135–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seltzer, J.A. and S.M. Bianchi. 1988. “Children’s Contact With Absent Parents.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 50: 663–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seltzer, J., N.C. Schaeffer, and H.W. Charng. 1989. “Family Ties After Divorce: The Relationship Between Visiting and Paying Child Support.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 51: 1013–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephens, L.S. 1996. “Will Johnny See Daddy This Week? An Empirical Test of Three Theoretical Perspectives of Postdivorce Contact.” Journal of Family Issues 17: 466–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, P.A., E.M. Krampe, and R.R. Newton. 2008. “Father Presence, Family Structure, and Feelings of Closeness to the Father Among Adult African American Children.” Journal of Black Studies 38: 529–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Census Bureau. 2006. Statistical Abstract of the United States 2006, Table 586. Washington, DC.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jacob E. Cheadle.

Additional information

This research was supported by funding from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) to Valarie King, principal investigator (R01 HD43384), and from core funding to the Population Research Institute, The Pennsylvania State University (R24 HD41025).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cheadle, J.E., Amato, P.R. & King, V. Patterns of nonresident father contact. Demography 47, 205–225 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1353/dem.0.0084

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/dem.0.0084

Keywords

Navigation