Resolving inconsistencies in trends in old-age disability: Report from a technical working group
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
In September 2002, a technical working group met to resolve previously published inconsistencies across national surveys in trends in activity limitations among the older population. The 12-person panel prepared estimates from five national data sets and investigated methodological sources of the inconsistencies among the population aged 70 and older from the early 1980s to 2001. Although the evidence was mixed for the 1980s and it is difficult to pinpoint when in the 1990s the decline began, during the mid- and late 1990s, the panel found consistent declines on the order of 1%–2.5% per year for two commonly used measures in the disability literature: difficulty with daily activities and help with daily activities. Mixed evidence was found for a third measure: the use of help or equipment with daily activities. The panel also found agreement across surveys that the proportion of older persons who receive help with bathing has declined at the same time as the proportion who use only equipment (but not personal care) to bathe has increased. In comparing findings across surveys, the panel found that the period, definition of disability, treatment of the institutionalized population, and age standardizing of results were important to consider. The implications of the findings for policy, national survey efforts, and further research are discussed.
This report was funded by the National Institute on Aging (AG14346-05S1). The authors acknowledge the assistance of Liming Cai, Aaron Hagedorn, and Richard Pickett in their provision of programming support and the helpful comments of Jennifer Madans and Julie Weeks. An earlier version of this article was presented at the annual meeting of the Population Association of America in Minneapolis, MN, May 2003. The views expressed are those of the authors alone and do not represent the views of the authors’ employers or the funding agency.
Agree, E.M. and V.A. Freedman. 2000. “Incorporating Assistive Devices Into Long Term Care Arrangements: Analysis of the Second Supplement on Aging.” Journal of Aging and Health 12:426–50.CrossRef
Albrecht, G.L., K.D. Seelman, and M. Bury. 2001. Handbook of Disability Studies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Arias, E. and B.L. Smith. 2003. Deaths: Preliminary Data for 2001. National Vital Statistics Report 51(5):1–44. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics.
Center for Demographic Studies (CDS), Duke University. 2003. National Long Term Care Survey 1982–1999 Public Use Data Files. Final Version 1.0.
Congressional Budget Office. 1999 . Projections for Long-term Care Services for the Elderly. Available on-line at ftp://ftp.cbo.gov/llxx/cbc1123/ltcare.pdf
Crimmins, E.M. and Y. Saito. 2000. “Change in the Prevalence of Diseases Among Older Americans: 1984–1994.” Demographic Research 3(9).
Crimmins, E.M., Y. Saito, and S.L. Reynolds. 1997. “Further Evidence on Recent Trends in the Prevalence and Incidence of Disability Among Older Americans From Two Sources: The LSOA and the NHIS.” Journals of Gerontology 52B:S59–71.
Freedman, V.A. 2000. “Implications of Asking ‘Ambiguous’ Difficulty Questions: An Analysis of the Second Wave of the Asset and Health Dynamics of the Oldest Old Study.” Journals of Gerontology 55B:S288–97.
Freedman, V.A., L.G. Martin, and R.F. Schoeni. 2002. “Recent Trends in Disability and Functioning Among Older Americans: A Critical Review of the Evidence.” Journal of the American Medical Association 288:3137–46.CrossRef
Fries, J.F. 1980. “Aging, Natural Death and the Compression of Morbidity.” New England Journal of Medicine 303:130–35.CrossRef
Gruenberg, E.M. 1977. “The Failures of Success.” Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly 55:3–24.CrossRef
Jette, A.M. 1994. “How Measurement Techniques Influence Estimates of Disability in Older Populations.” Social Science and Medicine 38:937–42.CrossRef
Katz, S., T.D. Downs, H.R. Cash, and R. Grotz. 1970. “Progress in Development of the Index of ADL.” Gerontologist 10:20–30.
Katz, S., A.B. Ford, R.W. Moskowitz, B.A. Jackson, and M.W. Jaffee. 1963. “Studies of Illness in the Aged: The Index of ADL, a Standardized Measure of Biological and Psychosocial Function.” Journal of the American Medical Association 185:914–19.
Liao, Y., D.L. McGee, G. Cao, and R.S. Cooper. 2001. “Recent Changes in the Health Status of the Older U.S. Population: Findings From the 1984 and 1994 Supplement on Aging.” Journal of the American Geriatric Society 49:443–49.CrossRef
Manton, K.G. 1982. “Changing Concepts of Morbidity and Mortality in the Elderly Population.” Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly 60:183–244.CrossRef
Manton, K.G. and X. Gu. 2001. “Changes in the Prevalence of Chronic Disability in the United States Black and Nonblack Population Above Age 65 From 1982 to 1999.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 98:6354–59.CrossRef
Picavet, H. and G. van den Bos. 1996. “Comparing Survey Data on Functional Disability: The Impact of Some Methodological Differences.” Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 50:86–93.CrossRef
Pope, A.M. and A.R. Tarlov, eds. 1991. Disability in America: Toward a National Agenda for Prevention. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Rodgers, W. and B. Miller. 1997. “A Comparative Analysis of ADL Questions in Surveys of Older People.” Journals of Gerontology 52B:S21–36.
Schoeni R.F., V.A. Freedman, and R. Wallace. 2001. “Persistent, Consistent, Widespread, and Robust? Another Look at Recent Trends in Old-Age Disability.” Journals of Gerontology 56B:S206–18.
Spillman, B.C. 2004. “Changes in Elderly Disability Rates and the Implications for Health Care Utilization and Cost.” Milbank Memorial Quarterly 82(1):157–94.
Verbrugge, L.M. 1990. “The Iceberg of Disability.” Pp. 55–75 in The Legacy of Longevity: Health and Health Care in Late Life, edited by S. Stahl. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Waidmann T. and K. Liu. 2000. “Disability Trends Among the Elderly and Implications for the Future.” Journals of Gerontology 55B:S298–307.
Wiener, J.M., R.J. Hanley, R. Clark, and J.F. Van Nostrand. 1990. “Measuring the Activities of Daily Living: Comparisons Across National Surveys.” Journals of Gerontology 45B:S229–37.
- Resolving inconsistencies in trends in old-age disability: Report from a technical working group
Volume 41, Issue 3 , pp 417-441
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Polisher Research Institute, Madlyn and Leonard Abramson Center for Jewish Life (formerly Philadelphia Geriatric Center), 1425 Horsham Road, 19454, North Wales, PA
- 2. University of Southern California, USA
- 3. University of Michigan, USA
- 4. Urban Institute, USA
- 5. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation, Office of Disability, Aging, and Long-Term Care, USA
- 6. Aging and Chronic Disease Statistics Branch, Office of Analysis and Epidemiology, National Center for Health Statistics, USA
- 7. Duke University, USA
- 8. University of Memphis, USA