How enduring were the inequalities among European immigrant groups in the United States?
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
A long-standing and unresolved issue in the study of racial and ethnic groups concerns the persistence of initial inequalities among groups. Recently it has surfaced again in the study of U.S. immigrant groups, in George Borjas’s (1994) claim that the human capital differences among early-twentieth-century immigrant groups are reflected in the relative socioeconomic achievements of their third generations. Reexamining this claim, we find that Borjas’s analysis hinges on a series of problematic decisions, such as his inclusion of non-European groups as well as his failure to take ethnically mixed ancestry into account and to compensate for the weak correspondence in eastern Europe between ethnic ancestry and the national frontiers of the early 1900s. We replicate a portion of his analysis, correcting for these problems. Our results reveal no correspondence between the literacy of the first generation and the educational attainment of the third among European groups. Borjas’s analysis seems to go farthest astray in including non-Europeans, especially Mexicans, because of the more systematic legal and social liabilities suffered by these groups.
- Acuña, R. 1988. Occupied America: A History of Chicanos. 3rd ed. New York: Harper & Row.
- Alba, R. 1985: Italian Americans: Into the Twilight of Ethnicity. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
- — 1990. Ethnic Identity: The Transformation of White America. New Haven: Yale University Press.
- Alba, R. and V. Nee. 1997. “Rethinking Assimilation Theory for a New Era of Immigration.” International Migration Review 31:826–74. CrossRef
- Bean, F., J. Chapa, R. Berg, and K. Sowards. 1994. “Educational and Sociodemographic Incorporation Among Hispanic Immigrants to the United States.” Pp. 73–100 in Immigration and Ethnicity, edited by B. Edmonston and J. Passel. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
- Borjas, G. 1994. “Long-Run Convergence of Ethnic Skill Differentials: The Children and Grandchildren of the Great Migration.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review 47:553–73. CrossRef
- — 1999. Heaven’s Door: Immigration Policy and the American Economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
- Calavita, K. 1992. Inside the State: The Bracero Program, Immigration, and the INS. New York: Routledge.
- Chiswick, B. 1988. “Differences in Education and Earnings Across Racial and Ethnic Groups: Tastes, Discrimination, and Investments in Child Quality.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 103:571–97. CrossRef
- Davis, J. and T. Smith. 1996. General Social Surveys, 1972–1996: Cumulative Codebook. Chicago: National Opinion Research Center.
- Gordon, L. 1999. The Great Arizona Orphan Abduction. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Gordon, M. 1964. Assimilation in American Life. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Lee, S. 1993. “Racial Classifications in the U.S. Census: 1890–1990.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 16:75–94. CrossRef
- Lieberson, S. 1961. “A Societal Theory of Race and Ethnic Relations.” American Sociological Review 26:902–10. CrossRef
- — 1980. A Piece of the Pie: Blacks and White Immigrants Since 1880. Berkeley: University of California Press.
- Lieberson, S. and M. Waters. 1988. From Many Strands: Ethnic and Racial Groups in Contemporary America. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
- — 1993. “The Ethnic Responses of Whites: What Causes Their Instability, Simplification, and Inconsistency?” Social Forces 72:421–50. CrossRef
- Lopez, D. and R. Stanton-Salazar. 2001. “Mexican Americans: A Second Generation at Risk.” Pp. 57–90 in Ethnicities: Coming of Age in Immigrant America, edited by R. Rumbaut and A. Portes. Berkeley: University of California Press.
- Massey, D. 1995. “The New Immigration and Ethnicity in the United States.” Population and Development Review 21:631–52. CrossRef
- Neidert, L. and R. Farley. 1985. “Assimilation in the United States: An Analysis of Ethnic and Generation Differences in Status and Achievement.” American Sociological Review 50:840–50. CrossRef
- Portes, A. and R. Rumbaut. 1996. Immigrant America: A Portrait. 2nd ed. Berkeley: University of California Press.
- Portes, A. and M. Zhou. 1993. “The New Second Generation: Segmented Assimilation and Its Variants.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 530:74–96. CrossRef
- Sánchez, G. 1993. Becoming Mexican American: Ethnicity, Culture, and Identity in Chicano Los Angeles, 1900/2-1945. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Schooler, C. 1976. “Serfdom’s Legacy: An Ethnic Continuum.” American Journal of Sociology 81:1265–86. CrossRef
- Waters, M. 1990. Ethnic Options: Choosing Identities in America. Berkeley: University of California Press.
- Wojtkiewicz, R. and K. Donato. 1995. “Hispanic Educational Attainment: The Effects of Family Background and Nativity.” Social Forces 74:559–74. CrossRef
- How enduring were the inequalities among European immigrant groups in the United States?
Volume 38, Issue 3 , pp 349-356
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- Industry Sectors