Family boundary ambiguity and the measurement of family structure: the significance of cohabitation
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
We used data from the first wave of the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health to examine family boundary ambiguity in adolescent and mother reports of family structure and found that the greater the family complexity, the more likely adolescent and mother reports of family structure were discrepant. This boundary ambiguity in reporting was most pronounced for cohabiting stepfamilies. Among mothers who reported living with a cohabiting partner, only one-third of their teenage children also reported residing in a cohabiting stepfamily. Conversely, for those adolescents who reported their family structure as a cohabiting stepfamily, just two-thirds of their mothers agreed. Levels of agreement between adolescents and mothers about residing in a two-biological-parent family, single-mother family, or married stepfamily were considerably higher. Estimates of the distribution of adolescents across family structures vary according to whether adolescent, mother, or combined reports are used. Moreover, the relationship between family structure and family processes differed depending on whose reports of family structure were used, and boundary ambiguity was associated with several key family processes. Family boundary ambiguity presents an important measurement challenge for family scholars.
- Acock, A.C. and D.H. Demo. 1994. Family Diversity and Well-being. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Bearman, P.S. and H. Brüückner. 2001. “Promising the Future: Abstinence Pledges and the Transition to First Intercourse.” American Journal of Sociology 106:859–912. CrossRef
- Bearman, P.S., J. Jones, and J.R. Udry. 1997. The National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health: Research Design. Available online at http://www.cpc.unc.edu/projects/addhealth/resdesign/ index/htm.
- Boss, P. 1980. “Normative Family Stress: Family Boundary Changes Across the Life Span.” Family Relations 29:445–50. CrossRef
- — 2007. “Ambiguous Loss Theory: Challenges for Scholars and Practitioners.” Family Relations 56:105–11. CrossRef
- Brofenbrenner, U. 1979. The Ecology of Human Development: Experiments by Nature and Design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Brown, S.L. 2006. “Family Structure Transitions and Adolescent Well-being.” Demography 43: 447–61. CrossRef
- Buchanan, C.M., E.E. Maccoby, and S.M. Dornbusch. 1996. Adolescents After Divorce. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Bumpass, L. and H. Lu. 2000. “Trends in Cohabitation and Implications for Children’s Family Contexts in the United States.” Population Studies 54:29–41. CrossRef
- Bumpass, L. and J. Sweet. 1989. “National Estimates of Cohabitation: Cohort Levels and Union Stability.” Demography 26:615–25. CrossRef
- Bumpass, L.L., J.A. Sweet, and A.J. Cherlin. 1991. “The Role of Cohabitation in Declining Rates of Marriage.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 53:913–27. CrossRef
- Carroll, J.S., C.D. Olson, and N. Buckmiller. 2007. “Family Boundary Ambiguity: A 30-Year Review of Theory, Research, and Measurement.” Family Relations 56:210–30. CrossRef
- Casper, L.M. and P.N. Cohen. 2000. “How Does POSSLQ Measure Up? Historical Estimates of Cohabitation.” Demography 37:237–45. CrossRef
- Cavanagh, S., K. Schiller, and C. Riegle-Crumb. 2006. “Marital Transitions, Parenting, and Schooling: Exploring the Link Between Family-Structure History and Adolescents’ Academic Status.” Sociology of Education 79:329–54. CrossRef
- Chantala, K. and J. Tabor. 1999. “Strategies to Perform a Design-Based Analysis Using the Add Health Data.” Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.
- Cherlin, A.J. 1978. “Remarriage as an Incomplete Institution.” American Journal of Sociology 84:634–50. CrossRef
- Cherlin, A.J. and F.F. Furstenberg. 1994. “Stepfamilies in the United States: A Reconsideration.” Annual Review of Sociology 20:359–81. CrossRef
- Day, R.D., S. Gavazzi, and A. Acock. 2001. “Compelling Family Processes.” Pp. 103–26 in The Wellbeing of Children and Families, edited by A. Thornton. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
- Demuth, S. and S.L. Brown. 2004. “Family Structure, Family Processes, and Adolescent Delinquency: The Signicance of Parental Absence Versus Parental Gender.” Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 41:58–81. CrossRef
- Furstenberg, F.F. 1987. “The New Extended Family.” Pp. 42–64 in Remarriage and Stepparenting: Current Research and Theory, edited by K. Pasley and M. Ihinger-Tallman. New York: Guilford Press.
- Ganong, L.H. and M. Coleman. 1994. Remarried Family Relationships. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Harris, K.M., G.J. Duncan, and J. Boisjoly. 2002. “Evaluating the Role of ‘Nothing to Lose’ Attitudes on Risky Behavior in Adolescence.” Social Forces 80:1005–39. CrossRef
- King, V., K. Harris, and H.E. Heard. 2004. “Racial and Ethnic Diversity in Nonresident Father Involvement.” Journal of Marriage and Family 66:1–21.
- Knab, J. 2004. “Who’s in for How Much: The Impact of Definitional Changes on the Prevalence and Outcomes of Cohabitation.” Center for Research on Child Well-Being Working Paper 2004-05. Princeton University, Princeton, NJ.
- London, R.A. 1998. “Trends in Single Mothers’ Living Arrangements From 1970 to 1995: Correcting the Current Population Survey.” Demography 35:125–31. CrossRef
- Madden-Derdich, D.A., S.A. Leonard, and F.S. Christopher. 1999. “Boundary Ambiguity and Coparental Conict After Divorce: An Empirical Test of the Family Systems Model of the Divorce Process.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 61:588–98. CrossRef
- Manning, W.D. 2002. “The Implications of Cohabitation for Children’s Well-being.” Pp. 121–52 in Just Living Together: Implications of Cohabitation for Children, Families, and Social Policy, edited by A. Booth and A. Crouter. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Manning, W.D. and K.A. Lamb. 2003. “Adolescent Well-being in Cohabiting, Married, and Single-Parent Families.” Journal of Marriage and Family 65:876–93. CrossRef
- Manning, W.D. and P.J. Smock. 1997. “Children’s Living Arrangements in Unmarried Mother Families.” Journal of Family Issues 18:526–44. CrossRef
- — 2005. “Measuring and Modeling Cohabitation: New Perspectives From Qualitative Data.” Journal of Marriage and Family 67:989–1002. CrossRef
- Meier, A. 2003. “Adolescents’ Transition to Intercourse, Religiosity, and Attitudes About Sex.” Social Forces 81:1031–52. CrossRef
- Nock, S.L. 1995. “A Comparison of Marriages and Cohabiting Relationships.” Journal of Family Issues 16:53–76. CrossRef
- Pasley, K. 1987. “Family Ambiguity Perception of Adult Stepfamily Members.” Pp. 206–24 in Remarriage and Stepparenting: Current Research and Theory, edited by K. Pasley and M. Ihinger-Tallman. New York: Guilford Press.
- Raley, R.K. and E. Wildsmith. 2004. “Cohabitation and Children’s Family Instability.” Journal of Marriage and Family 66:210–19. CrossRef
- Seltzer, J.A. 2000. “Families Formed Outside of Marriage.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 62:1247–68. CrossRef
- Stewart, S.D. 2005. “Boundary Ambiguity in Stepfamilies.” Journal of Family Issues 26:1002–29. CrossRef
- — 2007. Brave New Stepfamilies: Diverse Paths Toward Stepfamily Living. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Sun, Y. 2003. “The Well-being of Adolescents in Households With No Biological Parents.” Journal of Marriage and Family 65:894–909. CrossRef
- Teitler, J. and N. Reichman. 2001. “Cohabitation: An Elusive Concept.” Center for Research on Child Well-Being Working Paper 2001-07. Princeton University, Princeton, NJ.
- Teitler, J., N. Reichman, and H. Koball. 2006. “Contemporaneous Versus Retrospective Reports of Cohabitation in the Fragile Families Survey.” Journal of Marriage and Family 68:469–77. CrossRef
- Thornton, A., ed. 2001. The Well-being of Children and Families. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
- Videon, T.M. 2002. “The Effects of Parent-Adolescent Relationships and Parental Separation on Adolescent Well-being.” Journal of Marriage and Family 64:489–503. CrossRef
- White, L.K. 1998. “Who’s Counting? Quasi-facts and Stepfamilies in Reports of Number of Siblings.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 60:725–33. CrossRef
- Family boundary ambiguity and the measurement of family structure: the significance of cohabitation
Volume 46, Issue 1 , pp 85-101
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- Industry Sectors