Abstract
Background
Twitter social media is being used to disseminate medical meeting information. Meeting attendees and other interested parties have the ability to follow and participate in conversations related to meeting content. We analyzed Twitter activity generated from the 2013–2016 American Society of Breast Surgeons Annual Meetings.
Methods
The Symplur Signals database was used to determine number of tweets, tweets per user, and impressions for each meeting. The number of unique physicians, patients/caregivers/advocates, and industry participants was determined. Physician tweeters were cross-referenced with membership and attendance rosters. Tweet transcripts were analyzed for content and tweets were categorized as either scientific, social, administrative, industry promotion, or irrelevant.
Results
From 2013 to 2016, the number of tweets increased by 600 %, the number of Twitter users increased by 450 %, and the number of physician tweeters increased by 457 %. The number of impressions (tweets × followers) increased from more than 3.5 million to almost 20.5 million, an increase of 469 %. The majority of tweets were informative (70–80 %); social tweets ranged from 13 to 23 %. A small percentage (3–6 %) of tweets were related to administrative matters. There were very few industry or irrelevant tweets.
Conclusions
Twitter social media use at the American Society of Breast Surgeons annual meeting showed a substantial increase during the time period evaluated. The use of Twitter during professional meetings is a tremendous opportunity to share information. The authors feel that medical conference organizers should encourage Twitter participation and should be educating attendees on the proper use of Twitter.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Chaudhry A, Glodé M, Gillman M, Miller RS. Trends in Twitter use by physicians at the American Society of Clinical Oncology annual meeting, 2010 and 2011. J Oncol Pract. 2012;8(3):173–8.
McKendrick DRA, Cumming GP, Lee AJ. Increased use of Twitter at a medical conference: a report and review of the educational opportunities. J Med Internet Res. 2012;14(6):e176.
Wilkinson SE, Basto MY, Perovic G, Lawrentschuk N, Murphy DG. The social media revolution is changing the conference experience: analytics and trends from eight international meetings. BMJ Int. 2015;115(5):839–46.
Neill A, Cronin JJ, Brannigan D, O’Sullivan R, Cadogan M. The impact of social media on a major international emergency medicine conference. Emerg Med J. 2014:31(5):401–4.
Canvasser NE, Ramo C, Morgan TM, Zheng K, Hollenbeck BK, Ghani KR. The use of social media in endourology: an analysis of the 2013 World Congress of Endourology Meeting. J Endourol. 2015;29(5)615–20.
Ferguson C, Inglis SC, Newton PJ, Cripps PJS, Macdonald PS, Davidson PM. Social media: a tool to spread information: a case study analysis of Twitter conversation at the Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand 61st Annual Scientific Meeting 2013. Collegian. 2014;21(2):89–93.
Djuricich AM, Zee-Cheng JE. Live Tweeting in medicine: “Tweeting the meeting.” Int Rev Psychiatry. 2015;27(2):133–9.
http://vm.surgonc.org/common/pricing.aspx Accessed 27 May 2016.
http://blog.aacr.org/continue-the-conversation-social-media-at-the-aacr-annual-meeting/. Accessed 25 May 2016.
Ferguson C. If It’s Posted, Is It Published? Intellectual property, conferences, and social media. Collegian. 2014;21(2):79–80.
http://mdigitallife.com/mdlreports/. Accessed 27 May 2016.
Cochran A, Kao LS, Gusani NJ, Suliburk JW, Nwomeh BC. Use of Twitter to document the 2013 Academic Surgical Congress. J Surg Res. 2014;190(1):36–40.
Katz MS, Utengen A, Anderson, PF, Thompson MA, Attai DJ, Johnston C, Dizon DS. Disease-specific hashtags for online communication about cancer care. JAMA Oncol. 2016; 2(3):392–4.
Attai DJ, Cowher MS, Al-Hamadani M, Schoger JM, Staley AC, Lanrcasper J. Twitter social media is an effective tool for breast cancer patient education and support: patient-reported outcomes by survey. J Med Internet Res. 2015;17(7):e188.
Sedrak MS, Cohen RB, Merchant RM, Schapira MM. Cancer communication in the social media age. JAMA Oncol. 2016. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.5475.
Dizon DS, Graham D, Thompson MA, Johnson LJ, Johnston C, Fisch MJ, Miller R. Practical guidance: the use of social media in oncology practice. J Oncol Pract. 2012;8(5):e114–24.
Acknowledgment
The authors thank ASBrS staff members Sharon Grutman, Christina Lucara, Marti Boyer, and Mara Lang for their assistance with compiling the ASBrS Twitter experience history, as well as membership and attendance records. The authors would like to acknowledge Audun Utengen for his assistance with the Symplur Signals database.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Attai, D.J., Radford, D.M. & Cowher, M.S. Tweeting the Meeting: Twitter Use at The American Society of Breast Surgeons Annual Meeting 2013–2016. Ann Surg Oncol 23, 3418–3422 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-016-5406-x
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-016-5406-x