Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Completion Lymph Node Dissection or Observation for Melanoma Sentinel Lymph Node Metastases: A Decision Analysis

  • Melanomas
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Long-term, randomized trial results comparing completion lymph node dissection (CLND) with observation for patients with sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastases are not available. Our goal was to determine whether melanoma patients with SLN metastases should undergo CLND.

Methods

We developed a Markov model to simulate the prognosis of hypothetical cohorts of patients with SLN metastases who underwent either immediate CLND or observation with delayed CLND if macroscopic disease developed. Model parameters were derived from published studies and included the likelihood of non-SLN metastases, risk of dying from melanoma, CLND complication rates, and health-related quality-of-life weights. Outcomes included 5-year overall survival (OS), life expectancy (LE), and quality-adjusted life expectancy (QALE).

Results

The projected 5-year OS for 50-year-old patients with SLN metastases who underwent immediate CLND was 67.2 % compared with 63.1 % for the observation group. The LE gained by undergoing immediate CLND ranged from 2.19 years for patients aged 30 to 0.64 years for patients aged 70 years. The QALE gained by undergoing immediate CLND ranged from 1.39 quality-adjusted life years for patients aged 30 to 0.36 for patients aged 70 years. In sensitivity analysis over a clinically plausible range of values for each input parameter, immediate CLND was no longer beneficial when the rate of long-term complications increased and the quality-of-life weight for long-term complications decreased.

Conclusions

Immediate CLND following positive SLN biopsy was associated with OS and QALE gains compared with observation and delayed CLND for those who develop clinically apparent LN metastases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. National Cancer Center Network Guidelines in Oncology. Melanoma (Version 3.2015). March 2015. http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/melanoma.pdf. Accessed 12 Apr 2015.

  2. Morton DL, Thompson JF, Cochran AJ, et al. Sentinel-node biopsy or nodal observation in melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(13):1307–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bilimoria KY, Balch CM, Bentrem DJ, et al. Complete lymph node dissection for sentinel node-positive melanoma: assessment of practice patterns in the United States. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15(6):1566–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Wiener M, Acland KM, Shaw HM, et al. Sentinel node positive melanoma patients: prediction and prognostic significance of nonsentinel node metastases and development of a survival tree model. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17:1995–2005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. McMasters KM, Wong SL, Edwards MJ, et al. Frequency of nonsentinel lymph node metastasis in melanoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2002;9(2):137–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ghaferi AA, Wong SL, Johnson TM et al. Prognostic significance of a positive nonsentinel lymph node in cutaneous melanoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16:2978–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cascinelli N, Bombardieri E, Bufalino R, et al. Sentinel and nonsentinel node status in stage IB and II melanoma patients: two-step prognostic indicators of survival. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(27):4464–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sabel MS, Griffith K, Sondak VK, et al. Predictors of nonsentinel lymph node positivity in patients with a positive sentinel node for melanoma. J Am Coll Surg. 2005;201(1):37–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Wong SL, Balch CM, Hurley P, et al. Sentinel lymph node biopsy for melanoma: American Society of Clinical Oncology and Society of Surgical Oncology joint clinical practice guidelines. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(23):2912–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Morton DL, Thompson JF, Essner R, et al. Validation of the accuracy of intraoperative lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymphadenectomy for early-stage melanoma. Ann Surg. 1999;230(4):453–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Bamboat ZM, Konstantinidis IT, Kuk D, Ariyan CE, Brady MS, Coit DG. Observation after a positive sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with melanoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21(9):3117–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kingham TP, Panageas KS, Ariyan CE, Busam KJ, Brady MS, Coit DG. Outcome of patients with a positive sentinel lymph node who do not undergo completion lymphadenectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17(2):514–20.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Wong SL, Morton DL, Thompson JF, et al. Melanoma patients with positive sentinel nodes who did not undergo completion lymphadenectomy: a multi-institutional study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2006;13(6):809–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. van der Ploeg AP, van Akkooi AC, Rutkowski P, et al. Prognosis in patients with sentinel node-positive melanoma without immediate completion lymph node dissection. Br J Surg. 2012;99(10):1396–405.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sonnenberg FA, Beck JR. Markov models in medical decision making: a practical guide. Med Decis Making. 1993;13(4):322–38.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Balch CM, Gershenwald JE, Soong S, et al. Multivariate analysis of prognostic factors among 2313 patients with stage III melanoma: comparison of nodal versus macrometastases. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(14):2452–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Rueth NM, Groth SS, Tuttle TM, Virnig BA, Al-Refaie WB, Habermann EB. Conditional survival after surgical treatment of melanoma: an analysis of the surveillance, epidemiology and end results database. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17:1662–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Bowles TL, Xing T, Hu CY, et al. Conditional survival estimates improve over 5 years for melanoma survivors with node-positive disease. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17:2015–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Arias E. United States life tables, 2008. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2012;61(3):1–64.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Morton DL, Cochran AJ, Thompson JF, et al. Sentinel node biopsy for early-stage melanoma: accuracy and morbidity in MLST-1, an international multicenter trial. Ann Surg. 2005;242(3):302–13.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Wrightson WR, Wong SL, Edwards MJ, et al. Complications associated with sentinel lymph node biopsy for melanoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2003;10(6):676–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Faries MB, Thompson JF, Cochran A, et al. The impact on morbidity and length of stay of early versus delayed complete lymphadenectomy in melanoma: results of the Multicenter Selective Lymphadenectomy Trial (I). Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17(12):3324–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Ul-Mulk J, Holmich LR. Lymph node dissection in patients with malignant melanoma is associated with high risk of morbidity. Dan Med J. 2012;59(6):A4441.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kilbridge KL, Weeks JC, Sober AJ, et al. Patient preferences for adjuvant interferon alfa-2b treatment. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19(3):812–23.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Tromme I, Devleesschauwer B, Beutels P, et al. Health-related quality of life in patients with melanoma expressed as utilities and disability weights. Br J Dermatol. 2014;171(6):1443–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Morton RL, Howard K, Thompson JF. The cost-effectiveness of sentinel node biopsy in patients with intermediate thickness primary cutaneous melanoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16(4):929–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Cheville AL, Almoza M, Courmier JN, Basford JR. A prospective cohort study defining utilities using time trade-offs and the Euroqol-5D to assess the impact of cancer-related lymphedema. Cancer. 2010;116(15):3722–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Scheier BY, Lao CD, Kidwell KM, Redman BG. Use of pre-operative PET/CT staging in sentinel lymph node-positive melanoma. JAMA Oncol. 2015;2.1: 136–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. John Wayne Cancer Institute. Multicenter Selective Lymphadenectomy Trial II (MSLT-II). ClinicaTrials.gov Available at: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00297895. Accessed 1 June 2015.

  30. Pasquali S, Spillane AJ, de Wilt JHW, et al. Surgeons’ opinions on lymphadenectomy in melanoma patients with positive sentinel nodes: a worldwide web-based survey. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19:4322–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

VFW Surgical Oncology Researcher Award provided by the Veterans of Foreign Wars and Ladies Auxiliary Cancer Research Center Endowment Fund.

Disclosures

The authors of this manuscript have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Todd M. Tuttle MD, MS.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Burke, E.E., Portschy, P.R., Tuttle, T.M. et al. Completion Lymph Node Dissection or Observation for Melanoma Sentinel Lymph Node Metastases: A Decision Analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 23, 2772–2778 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-016-5273-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-016-5273-5

Keywords

Navigation