Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Prognostic Significance of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography (FDG-PET)-Positive Lymph Nodes Following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Surgery for Resectable Thoracic Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

  • Thoracic Oncology
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Patients with resectable thoracic esophageal squamous cell cancer (TESCC) and positron emission tomography (PET)-positive lymph nodes (PET-N positive) are likely to have ≥3 pathological lymph node metastases (pLNMs) and show a higher rate of postoperative recurrence despite curative resection than PET-N-negative TESCC patients. We examined the prognostic significance of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake into lymph node metastases after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for PET-N positive TESCC and aimed to propose the optimal NAC response criteria for these patients.

Methods

Fifty-one patients with PET-N positive TESCC underwent two courses of NAC followed by surgery. Metabolic responses of primary tumors and LNs were prospectively evaluated and associations with clinicopathological data and patient survival assessed by univariate and multivariate analyses.

Results

After NAC, 21 patients were post-treatment (post-) PET-N positive and 30 post-PET-N negative. A significantly (p < 0.001) high proportion of the post-PET-N-negative group had ≤2 pLNMs than the post-PET-N positive group (86.7 vs. 28.6 %). The PET-N negative group also had a significantly lower distant metastasis rate (23.3 vs. 75.0 %) and higher 5-year relapse-free survival (RFS) rate (69.0 vs. 20.0 %). Univariate and multivariate Cox’s proportional hazard regression analyses identified post-PET-N negative status as the only significant favorable predictive factor for low postoperative recurrence (p = 0.015) independent of the primary tumor response.

Conclusions

PET-N negative status predicts ≤2 pLNMs and longer RFS in resectable TESCC patients even after NAC. Therefore, post-PET-N status, not the effects on the primary tumor, is a critical NAC treatment response criterion for evaluating prognosis and guiding subsequent treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dresner SM, Griffin SM. Pattern of recurrence following radical oesophagectomy with two-field lymphadenectomy. Br J Surg. 2000;87:1426–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Nakagawa S, Kanda T, Kosugi S, et al. Recurrence pattern of squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus after extended radical esophagectomy with three-field lymphadenectomy. J Am Coll Surg. 2004;198:205–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kunisaki C, Makino H, Kimura J, et al. Impact of lymph-node metastasis site in patients with thoracic esophageal cancer. J Surg Oncol. 2010;101:36–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Rice TW, Rusch VW, Apperson-Hansen C, et al. Worldwide esophageal cancer collaboration. Dis Esophagus. 2009;22:1–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Rice TW, Rusch VW, Ishwaran H, et al. Cancer of the esophagus and esophagogastric junction. Data-driven staging for the seventh edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer/International Union against Cancer cancer staging manuals. Cancer. 2010;116:3763–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Yasuda T, Higuchi I, Yano M, et al. The impact of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography positive lymph nodes on postoperative recurrence and survival in resectable thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19:652–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Yasuda T, Yano M, Miyata H, et al. Systemic control and evaluation of the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in resectable thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-positive lymph nodes. Surg Today. 2014 Jun 27; [Epub ahead of print]. Accessed 27 June 2014. doi:10.1007/s00595-014-0956-7.

  8. Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumors: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer. 2009;45:228–47.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. WHO handbook for reporting results of cancer treatment. Geneva (Switzerland): World Health Organization Offset Publication No. 48; 1979.

  10. Miller AB, Hoogstraten B, Staquet M, et al. Reporting results of cancer treatment. Cancer. 1981;47:207–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Komori T, Doki Y, Kabuto T, et al. Prognostic significance of the size of cancer nests in metastatic lymph nodes in human esophageal cancers. J Surg Oncol. 2003;82:19–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Aguirre ACR, Ramos-Font C, Portero RV, et al. 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography for the evaluation of neoadjuvant therapy response in esophageal cancer. systematic review of the literature. Ann Surg. 2009;250:247–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Omloo JMT, van Heijl M, Hoekstra OS, et al. FDG-PET parameters as prognostic factor in esophageal cancer patients: a review. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18:3338–352.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Wong R, Walker-Dilks C, Raifu A. Evidence-based guideline recommendations on the use of positron emission tomography imaging in oesophageal cancer. Clin Oncol. 2012;24:86–104.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Akutsu Y, Shuto K, Kono T, et al. The number of pathologic lymph nodes involved is still a significant prognostic factor even after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. J Surg Oncol. 2012;105:756–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Castoro C, Scarpa M, Cagol M, et al. Nodal metastasis from locally advanced esophageal cancer: how neoadjuvant therapy modifies their frequency and distribution. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18:3743–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sobin LH, Wittekind C, eds. TNM classification of malignant tumors, 6th edn. New York: Wiley; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Greene FL, Page DL, Fleming ID, et al, eds. AJCC cancer staging manual, 6th edn. New York: Springer; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Fukunaga H, Sekimoto M, Tatsumi M, et al. Clinical relevance of fusion images using (18)F-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography in local recurrence of rectal cancer. Int J Oncol. 2002;20:691–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Paul AK, Tatsumi M, Higuchi I, et al. Gamma camera coincidence imaging with [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose in the pretreatment evaluation of patients with oesophageal cancer. Nucl Med Commun. 2003;24:963–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Higuchi I, Yasuda T, Yano M, et al. Lack of fluorodeoxyglucose F18 uptake in posttreatment positron emission tomography as a significant predictor of survival after subsequent surgery in multimodality treatment for patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008;136:205–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Akita H, Doki Y, Miyata H, et al. Clinical significance of the second cycle response to cisplatin-based chemotherapy as preoperative treatment for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. J Surg Oncol. 2006;93:401–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Shiozaki H, Yano M, Tsujinaka T, et al. Lymph node metastasis along the recurrent nerve chain is an indication for cervical lymph node dissection in thoracic esophageal cancer. Dis Esophagus. 2001;14:191–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Miyata H, Yano M, Doki Y, at al. A prospective trial for avoiding cervical lymph node dissection for thoracic esophageal cancers, based on intra-operative genetic diagnosis of micrometastasis in recurrent laryngeal nerve chain nodes. J Surg Oncol. 2006;93:477–84.

  25. The Japan Esophageal Society. Japanese classification of esophageal cancer, tenth edition: part I. Esophagus. 2009;6:1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Dhar DK, Hattori S, Tonomoto Y, et al. Appraisal of a revised lymph node classification system for esophageal squamous cell cancer. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;83:1265–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Gillies RS, Middleton MR, Han C, et al. Role of positron emission tomography-computed tomography in predicting survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery for oesophageal adenocarcinoma. Br J Surg. 2012;99:239–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Takushi Yasuda M.D..

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

10434_2014_4299_MOESM1_ESM.ppt

Supplemental Fig. E1 Relapse-free survival according to the number of pathologically metastatic lymph nodes. Each percent value shows 5-year survival rate (PPT 171 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yasuda, T., Yano, M., Miyata, H. et al. Prognostic Significance of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography (FDG-PET)-Positive Lymph Nodes Following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Surgery for Resectable Thoracic Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 22, 2599–2607 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-014-4299-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-014-4299-9

Keywords

Navigation