Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy is Associated with Improved Survival in Merkel Cell Carcinoma

  • Melanomas
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Melanomas to this article was published on 07 March 2014

Abstract

Background

Although sentinel lymph node biopsy (SNB) has become a standard for Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC), the impact on survival is unclear. To better define the staging and therapeutic value of SNB, we compared SNB with nodal observation.

Methods

Patients with clinical stage I and II MCC in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registry undergoing surgery between 2003 and 2009 were identified and divided into two groups—SNB and observation.

Results

A total of 1,193 patients met the inclusion criteria (SNB 474 and Observation 719). The median age was 78 years, and the majority were White (95.3 %), male (58.8 %), received radiation therapy (52.9 %) and had T1 tumors (65.3 %). Twenty-four percent had a positive SNB. SNB patients were younger (73 vs. 81 years; p < 0.0001), had T1 tumors (69.6 vs. 62.5 %; p = 0.04) and received radiotherapy (57.8 vs. 40 %; p < 0.0001). Among biopsy patients, a negative SNB was associated with improved 5-year MCC-specific survival (84.5 vs. 64.6 %; p < 0.0001). Univariate analysis demonstrated an increased 5-year MCC-specific survival for the SNB group versus the Observation group (79.2 vs. 73.8 %; p = 0.004), female gender (83.2 vs. 70.4 %; p = 0.0004), and lower T stage (p < 0.0001). On Cox regression, diminished survival was noted for the Observation group (risk ratio [RR] 1.43; p = 0.04), male gender (RR 2.06; p < 0.0001), and a higher T stage.

Conclusion

SNB for MCC provides prognostic information and is associated with a significant survival advantage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Toker C. Trabecular carcinoma of the skin. Arch Derm. 1972;105:107–10.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Tang CK, Toker C. Trabecular carcinoma of the skin: an ultrastructural study. Cancer. 1978;42(5):2311–21.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Walsh NM. Primary neuroendocrine (Merkel cell) carcinoma of the skin: morphologic diversity and implications thereof. Hum Pathol. 2001;32(7):680–89.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Sibley RK, Dehner LP, Rosai J. Primary neuroendocrine (Merkel cell?) carcinoma of the skin. Am J Surg Pathol. 1985;9(2):95–108.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Tilling T, Moll I. Which are the cells of origin in Merkel cell carcinoma? J Skin Cancer. 2012;2012:680410.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Muñoz IP, Pardo Masferrer J, Olivera Vegas J, Medina Montalvo MS, Jover Diaz R, Pérez Casas AM. Merkel cell carcinoma from 2008 to 2012: reaching a new level of understanding. Cancer Treat Rev. 2013;39(5):421–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Feng H, Shuda M, Chang Y, Moore PS. Clonal integration of a polyomavirus in human Merkel cell carcinoma. Science. 2008;319:1096–1100.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Pitale M, Sessions RB, Husain S. An analysis of prognostic factors in cutaneous neuroendocrine carcinoma. Laryngoscope. 1992;102:244–49.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Tarantola TI, Vallow LA, Halyard MY, Weenig RH, Warschaw KE, Grotz TE, et al. Prognostic factors in Merkel cell carcinoma: analysis of 240 cases. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2013;68(3):425-432.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Yiengpruksawn A, Coit DG, Thaler HT, Urmacher C, Knapper WK. Merkel cell carcinoma prognosis and managment. Arch Surg. 1991;126:1514–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Allen PJ, Bowne WB, Jaques DP, Brennan MF, Busam K, Coit DG. Merkel cell carcinoma: prognosis and treatment of patients from a single institution. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(10):2300–09.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Allen PJ, Zhang ZF, Coit DG. Surgical management of Merkel cell carcinoma. Ann Surg. 1999;229(1):97–105.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Victor NS, Morton B, Smith JW. Merkel cell cancer: is prophylactic lymph node dissection indicated? Am Surg. 1996;62(11):879–82.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kokoska ER, Kokoska MS, Collins BT, Stapleton DR, Wade TP. Early aggressive treatment for Merkel cell carcinoma improves outcome. Am J Surg. 1997;174:688–93.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Boyle F, Pendlebury S, Bell D. Further insights into the natural history and management of primary cutaneous neuroendocrine (Merkel cell) carcinoma. Int J Radiation Oncol Biol Phys. 1995;31(2):315–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Wong KC, Zuletta F, Clarke SJ, Kennedy PJ. Clinical management and treatment outcomes of Merkel cell carcinoma. Aust NZ J Surg 1998;68:354–59.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Shaw JH, Rumball E. Merkel cell tumour: clinical behaviour and treatment. Br J Surg. 1991;78:138–42.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Bichakjian CK, Lowe L, Lao CD, Sandler HM, Bradford CR, Johnson TM, et al. Merkel cell carcinoma: critical review with guidelines for multidisciplinary management. Cancer. 2007;110(1):1–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Medina-Franco H, Urist MM, Fiveash J, Heslin MJ, Bland KI, Beenken SW. Multimodality treatment of Merkel cell carcinoma: case series and literature review of 1,024 cases. Ann Surg Oncol. 2001;8(3):204–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Wang TS, Byrne PJ, Jacobs LK, Taube JM. Merkel cell carcinoma: update and review. Semin Cutan Med Surg. 2011;30:49–56.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Howle J, Veness M. Sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with Merkel cell carcinoma: an emerging role and the Westmead hospital experience. Aust J Dermatol. 2012;55:26–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Messina JL, Reintgen DS, Cruse CW, Rappaport DP, Berman C, Fenske NA, et al. Selective lymphadenectomy in patients with Merkel cell (cutaneous neuroendocrine) carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 1997;4(5):389–95.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Veness M, Howle J. Patients with clinically node negative extremity Merkel cell carcinoma: the importance of identifying and treating patients with microscopic nodal metastases. Aust J Dermatol. 2010;51:274–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Mehrany K, Otley CC, Weenig RH, Phillips PK, Roenigk RK, Nguyen TH. A meta-analysis of the prognostic significance of sentinel lymph node status in Merkel cell carcinoma. Dermatol Surg. 2002;28(2):113–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Morton DL, Thompson JF, Cochran AJ, Mozzillo N, Elashoff R, Essner R, et al. Sentinel-node biopsy or nodal observation in melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(13):1307–17.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Program Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER). SEER research data (1973–2009). SEER*Stat. 2011.

  27. Edge SB, Byrd DR, Compton CC, et al. (eds). AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 7th ed. Merkel cell carcinoma. Philadelphia: Lippincott Raven Publishers; 2010.

  28. Hodgson NC. Merkel cell carcinoma: changing incidence trends. J Surg Oncol. 2005;89:1–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Lemos B, Nghiem P. Merkel cell carcinoma: more deaths but still no pathway to blame. J Invest Dermatol. 2007;127:2100–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Howle JR, Hughes TM, Gebski V, Veness MJ. Merkel cell carcinoma: an Australian perspective and the importance of addressing the regional lymph nodes in clinically node-negative patients. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2012;67(1):33–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Ott MJ, Tanabe KK, Gadd MA, Stark P, Smith BL, Finkelstein DM, et al. Multimodality management of Merkel cell carcinoma. Arch Surg. 1999;134:388–93.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Gonzalez RJ, Padhya TA, Cherpelis BS, Prince MD, Aya-Ay ML, Sondak VK, et al. The surgical management of primary and metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma. Curr Probl Cancer. 2010;34(1):77–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Sian KU, Wagner JD, Sood R, Park HM, Havlik R, Coleman JJ. Lymphoscintigraphy with sentinel lymph node biopsy in cutaneous Merkel cell carcinoma. Ann Plast Surg. 1999;42(6):679–82.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Lemos BD, Storer BE, Iyer JG, Phillips JL, Bichakjian CK, Fang LC, et al. Pathologic nodal evaluation improves prognostic accuracy in Merkel cell carcinoma: analysis of 5,823 cases as the basis of the first consensus staging system. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2010;63:751–61.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Meeuwissen JA, Bourne RG, Kearsley JH. The importance of postoperative radiation therapy in the treatment of Merkel cell carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1995;31(2):325–31.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Ames SE, Krag DN, Brady MS. Radiolocalization of the sentinel lymph node in Merkel cell carcinoma: a clinical analysis of seven cases. J Surg Oncol. 1998;67:251–54.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Wasserberg N, Schachtre J, Fenig E, Feinmesser M, Gutman H. Applicability of the sentinel node technique to Merkel cell carcinoma. Dermatol Surg. 2000;26(2):138–41.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Allen PJ, Busam K, Hill AK, Stojadinovic A, Coit DG. Immunohistochemical analysis of sentinel lymph nodes from patients with Merkel cell carcinoma. Cancer. 2001;92(6):1650–55.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Portilla AG, Sugarbaker PH, Chang D. Second-look surgery after cytoreduction and intraperitoneal chemotherapy for peritoneal carcinomatosis from colorectal cancer: analysis of prognostic features. World J Surg. 1999;23(1):23–29.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Network National Comprehensive Cancer. Merkel cell carcinoma. 2012. http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/mcc.pdf. Accessed July 2013.

  41. Maza S, Trefer U, Hofmann M, Schneider S, Voit C, Krössin T, et al. Impact of sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with Merkel cell carcinoma: results of a prospective study and review of the literature. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2006;33(4):433–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Schmalbach CE, Lowe L, Teknos TN, Johnson TM, Bradford CR. Reliability of sentinel lymph node biopsy for regional staging of head and neck Merkel cell carcinoma. Arch Otoloaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2005;141:610–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Fang LC, Lemos B, Douglas J, Iyer J, Nghiem P. Radiation monotherapy as regional treatment for lymph node-positive Merkel cell carcinoma. Cancer. 2010;116(7):1783–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Gupta SG, Wang LC, Penas PF, Gellenthin M, Lee SJ, Ngheim P. Sentinel lymph node biopsy for evaluation and treatment of patients with Merkel cell carcinoma. Arch Dermatol. 2006;142:685–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Schwartz JL, Griffith KA, Lowe L, Wong SL, McLean SA, Fullen DR, et al. Features predicting sentinel lymph node positivity in Merkel cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(8):1036–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Fields RC, Busam KJ, Chou JF, Panageas KS, Pulitzer MP, Kraus DH, et al. Recurrence and survival in patients undergoing sentinel lymph node biopsy for Merkel cell carcinoma: analysis of 153 patients from a single institution. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18:2529–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Heath M, Jaimes N, Lemos B, Mostaghimi A, Wang LC, Peñas PF, et al. Clinical characteristics of Merkel cell carcinoma at diagnosis in 195 patients: the AEIOU features. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2008;58(3):375–81.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Akhtar S, Oza KK, Wright J. Merkel cell carcinoma: report of 10 cases and review of the literature. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2000;43(5):755–67.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Voog E, Biron P, Martin JP, Blay JY. Chemotherapy for patients with locally advanced or metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma. Cancer. 2000;85(12):2589–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Feun LG, Savaraj N, Legha SS, Silva EG, Benjamin RS, Burgess MA. Chemotherapy for metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma: review of the M.D. Anderson Hospital’s experience. Cancer. 1988;62:683–85.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Garneski KM, Nghiem P. Merkel cell carcinoma adjuvant therapy: current data support radiation but not chemotherapy. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2007;57(1):166–69.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Stadelmann WK, Cobbins L, Lentsch EJ. Incidence of nonlocalization of sentinel lymph nodes using preoperative lymphoscintigraphy in 74 consecutive head and neck melanoma and Merkel cell carcinoma patients. Ann Plast Surg. 2004;52(6):546–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosure

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Timothy L. Fitzgerald MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kachare, S.D., Wong, J.H., Vohra, N.A. et al. Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy is Associated with Improved Survival in Merkel Cell Carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 21, 1624–1630 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-013-3434-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-013-3434-3

Keywords

Navigation