Nipple Skin-Sparing Mastectomy is Feasible for Advanced Disease
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM) or nipple skin-sparing mastectomy (NSSM) are procedures commonly offered as part of the surgical treatment for breast cancer. Each involves a mastectomy with preservation of the skin overlying the breast (in SSM) and often also the skin overlying the nipple-areolar complex (NSSM). At the time of mastectomy, immediate reconstruction with a tissue expander or implant is performed for a more favorable cosmetic outcome. Until now, these procedures have been reserved for low-risk patients and are rarely offered to patients with advanced disease where neoadjuvant chemotherapy and postmastectomy radiation are a planned part of the treatment. We report our experience of SSM and NSSM in such high-risk patients.
This retrospective study from 2001 to 2012 evaluates the outcomes of 527 patients who underwent SSM or NSSM. Sixty patients with advanced disease who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by SSM or NSSM with immediate reconstruction and subsequent radiotherapy (RT) were identified. The cosmetic and oncologic outcomes of this patient group were noted.
A total of 527 patients in our study group had a total of 1,035 skin-sparing mastectomies (558 NSSM and 477 SSM; 444 patients with bilateral and 83 with unilateral procedures). Of the 60 patients with locally advanced disease, 39 underwent NSSM and 21 underwent SSM. All patients received RT to the diseased side. Mean age of the group was 50.2 ± 10.8 years, with a range of 27–75 years for NSSM and 29–73 years for SSM. The lymph node status was positive in 71.8 % with an average tumor size of 3.8 ± 2.5 cm. The overall radiation-induced complication rate was 38.1 % (8 of 21) in the SSM group and 30.8 % (12 of 39) in the NSSM group. Wound infections and tissue necrosis occurred at a rate of 16.7 %. The implant was removed in 5 % of these cases. Capsular contracture occurred at a rate of 10.2 %. Radiation-related nonbreast complications occurred in 6.7 % of the cases. Examples of these radiation-related nonbreast complications included radiation pneumonitis, stenosis of the superior vena cava requiring venoplasty and severe atypical chest pain thought to be consistent with osteochondritis. The locoregional recurrence rate (median follow-up of 18 months) was 14.3 % (3 of 21) in the SSM group and 10.3 % (4 of 39) in the NSSM group.
SSM and NSSM have been offered to patients with relatively low-risk breast cancer as oncologically safe while affording superior cosmesis with one-step immediate reconstruction. Our series demonstrates that either procedure can be offered to patients with more advanced cancers requiring postoperative RT. The complication rates are comparable to those reported for patients undergoing RT after traditional mastectomies.
- Toth, BA, Lappert, P (1991) Modified skin incisions for mastectomy: the need for plastic surgical input in preoperative planning. Plast Reconstr Surg. 87: pp. 1048-1053 CrossRef
- Elkovitz, A, Colen, S, Slavin, S, Seibert, J, Weinstein, M, Shaw, W (1993) Various methods of breast reconstruction after mastectomy: an economic comparison. Plast Reconstr Surg. 92: pp. 77-83 CrossRef
- Khoo, A, Kroll, SS, Reece, GP (1998) A comparison of resource costs of immediate and delayed breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 101: pp. 964-968 CrossRef
- Rosenqvist, S, Sandelin, K, Wickman, M (1996) Patients psychological and cosmetic experience after immediate breast reconstruction. Eur J Surg Oncol. 22: pp. 262-266 CrossRef
- Al-Ghazal, SK, Sully, L, Fallowfield, L, Blamey, RW (2000) The psychological impact of immediate rather than delayed reconstruction. Eur J Surg Oncol. 26: pp. 17-19 CrossRef
- Wilkins, EG, Cederna, PS, Lowery, JC (2000) Prospective analysis of psychosocial outcomes in breast reconstruction: one-year postoperative results from the Michigan breast reconstruction outcome study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 106: pp. 1014-1025 CrossRef
- Cunnick, G, Mokbel, K (2006) Oncological considerations of skin-sparing mastectomy. Int Semin Surg Oncol. 3: pp. 14 CrossRef
- Boneti, C, Yuen, J, Santiago, C (2011) Oncologic safety of nipple skin-sparing or total skin-sparing mastectomies with immediate reconstruction. J Am Coll Surg. 212: pp. 686-693 CrossRef
- Stolier A, Sullivan S, Dellacroce F. Technical considerations in nipple-sparing mastectomy: 82 consecutive cases without necrosis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15:1341–7.
- Layeeque R, Kepple J, Henry-Tillman R, et al. Intraoperative subareolar radioisotope injection for immediate sentinel lymph node biopsy. Ann Surg. 2004;239(6):841–8.
- Boneti C, Korourian S, Bland K, et al. Axillary reverse mapping: mapping and preserving arm lymphatics may be important in preventing lymphedema during sentinel lymph node biopsy. J Am Coll Surg. 2008;206(5):1038–44.
- Klimberg VS, Westbrook KC, Korourian S. Use of touch preps for diagnosis and evaluation of surgical margins in breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 1998;5(3):220–6.
- Layeeque R, Hochberg J, Siegel E, et al. Botulinum toxin infiltration for pain control after mastectomy and expander reconstruction. Ann Surg. 2004;240:608–13, 613–4 (discussion).
- Hochberg J, Yuen J. Atlas of breast surgical techniques, Chap. 18. In: Suzanne Klimberg V, editor. Breast reconstruction postmastectomy with tissue expanders and alloderm.
- Carlson G, Page A, Johnson E, Nicholson D, Styblo T, Wood W. Local recurrence of ductal carcinoma in situ after skin-sparing mastectomy. JACS. 2007;204(5):1074–8.
- Spiegel A, Butler C. Recurrence following treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ with skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;111(2):706–11.
- Lim W, Ko B, Kim K, et al. Oncological safety of skin sparing mastectomy followed by immediate reconstruction for locally advanced breast cancer. J Surg Oncol. 2010;102(1):39–42.
- Newman L, Kuerer H, Hunt K, et al. Presentation, treatment, and outcome of local recurrence after skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction. Ann Surg Oncol. 1998;5(7):620–6.
- Carlson GW, Styblo TM, Lyles R, et al. Local recurrence after skin-sparing mastectomy: tumor biology or surgical conservatism? Ann Surg Oncol. 2003;10(2):108–12.
- Kroll SS, Khoo A. Local recurrence risk after skin-sparing and conventional mastectomy: a 6-year follow-up. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999;104(2):421–5.
- Langstein HN, Cheng MH, Singletary SE, et al. Breast cancer recurrence after immediate reconstruction: patterns and significance. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;111(2):712–20.
- Medina-Franco H, Vasconez LO, Fix RJ, et al. Factors associated with local recurrence after skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction for invasive breast cancer. Ann Surg. 2002;235(6):814–9.
- Simmons RM, Fish SK, Gayle L, et al. Local and distant recurrence rates in skin-sparing mastectomies compared with non-skin-sparing mastectomies. Ann Surg Oncol. 1999;6(7):676–81.
- Cunnick GH, Mokbel K. Skin-sparing mastectomy. Am J Surg. 2004;188(1):78–84.
- Rowell NP. Radiotherapy to the chest wall following mastectomy for node-negative breast cancer: a systematic review. Radiother Oncol. 2009;91(1):23–32.
- Al Mushawah F, Rastelli A, Pluard T, Margenthaler JA. Metastatic invasive breast cancer recurrence following curative-intent therapy for ductal carcinoma in situ. J Surg Res. 2012;173(1):10–5.
- Godat LN, Horton JK, Shen P, Stewart JH, Wentworth S, Levine EA. Recurrence after mastectomy for ductal carcinoma in situ. Am Surg. 2009;75(7):592–5.
- Kelley L, Silverstein M, Guerra L. Analyzing the risk of recurrence after mastectomy for DCIS: a new use for the USC/Van Nuys prognostic index. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18(2):459–62.
- Kim JH, Tavassoli F, Haffty BG. Chest wall relapse after mastectomy for ductal carcinoma in situ: a report of 10 cases with a review of the literature. Cancer J. 2006;12(2):92–101.
- Kronowitz SJ, Robb GL. Breast reconstruction with postmastectomy radiation therapy: current issues. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;114:950–60.
- Hunt KK, Baldwin BJ, Strom EA, et al. Feasibility of postmastectomy radiation therapy after TRAM flap breast reconstruction. Ann Surg Oncol. 1997;4:377–84.
- Mehta VK, Goffinet D. Postmastectomy radiation therapy after TRAM flap breast reconstruction. Breast J. 2004;10:118–22.
- Javaid M, Song F, Leinster S, Dickson MG, James NK. Radiation effects on the cosmetic outcomes of immediate and delayed autologous breast reconstruction: an argument about timing. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2006;59:16–26.
- Evans GR, Schusterman MA, Kroll SS. Reconstruction and the radiated breast: is there a role for implants? Plast Reconstr Surg. 1995;96:1111–5.
- McCarthy CM, Pusic AL, Disa JJ, McCormick BL, Montgomery LL, Cordeiro PG. Unilateral postoperative chest wall radiotherapy in bilateral tissue expander/implant reconstruction patients: a prospective outcomes analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;116:1642–7.
- Cordeiro PG, Pusic AL, Disa JJ, McCormick B, VanZee K. Irradiation after immediate tissue expander/implant breast reconstruction: outcomes, complications, aesthetic results, and satisfaction among 156 patients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;113:877–81.
- Kronowitz SJ, Hunt KK, Kuerer HM, et al. Delayed-immediate breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;113:1617–28.
- Jackson WB, Goldson AL, Staud C. Postoperative irradiation following immediate breast reconstruction using a temporary tissue expander. J Natl Med Assoc. 1994;86:538–42.
- Spear SL, Parikh PM, Reisin E, Menon NG. Acellular dermis-assisted breast reconstruction. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2008;32(3):418–25.
- Sbitany H, Sandeen SN, Amalfi AN, Davenport MS, Langstein HN. Acellular dermis-assisted prosthetic breast reconstruction versus complete submuscular coverage: a head-to-head comparison of outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124(6):1735–40.
- Wainwright DJ. Use of an acellular allograft dermal matrix (AlloDerm) in the management of full-thickness burns. Burns. 1995;21(4):243–8.
- Butler CE, Langstein HN, Kronowitz SJ. Pelvic, abdominal, and chest wall reconstruction with AlloDerm in patients at increased risk for mesh-related complications. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;116(5):1263–75, 1276–7 (discussion)
- Chaplin JM, Costantino PD, Wolpoe ME, Bederson JB, Griffey ES, Zhang WX. Use of an acellular dermal allograft for dural replacement: an experimental study. Neurosurgery. 1999;45(2):320–7.
- Breuing KH, Warren SM. Immediate bilateral breast reconstruction with implants and inferolateral AlloDerm slings. Ann Plast Surg. 2005;55(3):232–9.
- Salzberg CA. Nonexpansive immediate breast reconstruction using human acellular tissue matrix graft (AlloDerm). Ann Plast Surg. 2006;57(1):1–5.
- Bindingnavele V, Gaon M, Ota KS, Kulber DA, Lee DJ. Use of acellular cadaveric dermis and tissue expansion in postmastectomy breast reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2007;60(11):1214–8.
- Antony AK, McCarthy CM, Cordeiro PG, et al. Acellular human dermis implantation in 153 immediate two-stage tissue expander breast reconstructions: determining the incidence and significant predictors of complications. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;125(6):1606–14.
- Rawlani V, Buck DW 2nd, Johnson SA, Heyer KS, Kim JY. Tissue expander breast reconstruction using prehydrated human acellular dermis. Ann Plast Surg. 2011;66:593–7.
- Breuing KH, Colwell AS. Immediate breast tissue expander-implant reconstruction with inferolateral AlloDerm hammock and postoperative radiation: a preliminary report. Eplasty. 2009;9:e16.
- Nahabedian MY. AlloDerm performance in the setting of prosthetic breast surgery, infection, and irradiation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124(6):1743–53.
- Salzberg CA, Ashikari AY, Koch RM, Chabner-Thompson E. An 8-year experience of direct-to-implant immediate breast reconstruction using human acellular dermal matrix (AlloDerm). Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;127(2):514–24.
- Nipple Skin-Sparing Mastectomy is Feasible for Advanced Disease
Annals of Surgical Oncology
Volume 20, Issue 10 , pp 3294-3302
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer US
- Additional Links
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Division of Breast Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Winthrop P. Rockefeller Cancer Institute, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA
- 2. Arkansas Breast Cancer Act Breast Cancer Interdisciplinary Breast Fellowship, Little Rock, AR, USA
- 4. Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA
- 5. Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA
- 6. Department of Pathology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA
- 3. Tenenbaum Breast Cancer Foundation, Little Rock, AR, USA
- 7. Fashion Footwear Association of New York (FFANY/QVC), New York, NY, USA