Annals of Surgical Oncology

, Volume 20, Issue 11, pp 3370–3376

Failure-to-Rescue After Colorectal Cancer Surgery and the Association with Three Structural Hospital Factors

Authors

    • Department of Surgery, K-6Leiden University Medical Center
  • N. J. van Leersum
    • Department of Surgery, K-6Leiden University Medical Center
  • M. ten Berge
    • Department of Surgery, K-6Leiden University Medical Center
  • H. S. Snijders
    • Department of Surgery, K-6Leiden University Medical Center
  • M. Fiocco
    • Department of Medical StatisticsLeiden University Medical Center
  • T. Wiggers
    • Department of SurgeryUniversity Medical Center Groningen
  • R. A. E. M. Tollenaar
    • Department of Surgery, K-6Leiden University Medical Center
  • M. W. J. M. Wouters
    • Department of Surgical OncologyNational Cancer Institute (NKI)—Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital
Healthcare Policy and Outcomes

DOI: 10.1245/s10434-013-3037-z

Cite this article as:
Henneman, D., van Leersum, N.J., ten Berge, M. et al. Ann Surg Oncol (2013) 20: 3370. doi:10.1245/s10434-013-3037-z

Abstract

Background

This study was designed to evaluate the association between structural hospital characteristics and failure-to-rescue (FTR) after colorectal cancer surgery. A growing body of evidence suggests a large hospital variation concerning mortality rates in patients with a severe complication (FTR) in colorectal cancer surgery. Which structural hospital factors are associated with better FTR rates remains largely unclear.

Methods

All patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery from 2009 through 2011 in 92 Dutch hospitals were analysed. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models, including casemix, hospital volume, teaching status, and different levels of intensive care unit (ICU) facilities, were used to analyse risk-adjusted FTR rates.

Results

A total of 25,591 patients from 92 hospitals were included. The FTR rate ranged between 0 and 39 %. In univariate analysis, high hospital volume (>200 vs. ≤200 patients/year), teaching status (academic vs. teaching vs. nonteaching hospitals) and high level of ICU facilities (highest level 3 vs. lowest level 1) were associated with lower FTR rates. Only the higher levels of ICU facilities (2 or 3 compared with level 1) were independently associated with lower failure-to-rescue rates (odds ratio 0.72; 95 % confidence interval 0.65–0.88) in multivariate analysis.

Discussion

Hospital type and annual hospital volume were not independently associated with FTR rates in colorectal cancer surgery. Instead, the lowest level of ICU facilities was independently associated with higher rates. This suggests that a more advanced ICU may be an important factor that contributes to better failure-to-rescue rates, although individual hospitals perform well with lower ICU levels.

Copyright information

© Society of Surgical Oncology 2013