MRI Utilization in Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer: A Survey of Practicing Surgeons
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Whereas guidelines supporting breast MRI in high-risk screening exist, guidelines for MRI use in newly diagnosed breast cancer are lacking. We, therefore, conducted a study of breast surgeons to determine practice beliefs surrounding MRI use in newly diagnosed breast cancer.
A survey sent to 2,274 American Society of Breast Surgeons members in December 2010 queried routine MRI use (defined as >75 % of time) in specific clinical scenarios. Analyses were performed by respondent practice setting, practice volume, and practice specialization. Descriptive statistics and subgroup analysis using a χ2 and logistic regression were used.
Responses from 1,012 surgeons (45.5 % response rate) were eligible for analysis. Respondents represented diverse practice settings (20 % academic, 72 % private practice) and volume (≤50 new breast cancer patients, 36 %; 51–100, 26 %; 101–200, 25 %; >200, 13 %). Also, 41 % of surgeons indicated routine MRI use for newly diagnosed patients, with higher rates of use among surgeons from high-volume practices, high specialization, and private practice. Greater consensus in routine MRI use was seen in the setting of extreme mammographic density (87.9 %), strong family history of breast cancer (73.4 %), and invasive lobular carcinoma (69.4 %). Responses were increasingly discordant in setting of pursuing breast conservation (47.4 %), invasive ductal carcinoma (41.8 %), and ductal carcinoma in situ (37.2 %). Personal experience was the most commonly cited influence on MRI use.
Divergent responses in MRI use in newly diagnosed breast cancer reflect clinical uncertainty and variable practice beliefs among breast surgeons. Such diverging practice patterns highlight areas where clinical research and guidelines may be most helpful.
- Saslow, D, Boetes, C, Burke, W, Harms, S, Leach, MO, Lehman, CD (2007) American Cancer Society guidelines for breast screening with MRI as an adjunct to mammography. CA Cancer J Clin. 57: pp. 75-89 CrossRef
- SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975–2008. http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2008. Accessed 19 Mar 2013.
- Kriege, M, Brekelmans, CT, Boetes, C, Besnard, PE, Zonderland, HM, Obdeijn, IM (2004) Efficacy of MRI and mammography for breast-cancer screening in women with a familial or genetic predisposition. N Engl J Med. 351: pp. 427-437 CrossRef
- Kriege, M, Brekelmans, CT, Obdeijn, IM, Boetes, C, Zonderland, HM, Muller, SH (2006) Factors affecting sensitivity and specificity of screening mammography and MRI in women with an inherited risk for breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 100: pp. 109-119 CrossRef
- Davis, PL, McCarty, KS (1997) Sensitivity of enhanced MRI for the detection of breast cancer: new, multicentric, residual, and recurrent. Eur Radiol. 7: pp. 289-298 CrossRef
- Bleicher, RJ, Ciocca, RM, Egleston, BL, Sesa, L, Evers, K, Sigurdson, ER (2009) Association of routine pretreatment magnetic resonance imaging with time to surgery, mastectomy rate, and margin status. J Am Coll Surg. 209: pp. 180-187 CrossRef
- Houssami, N, Ciatto, S, Macaskill, P, Lord, SJ, Warren, RM, Dixon, JM (2008) Accuracy and surgical impact of magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer staging: systematic review and meta-analysis in detection of multifocal and multicentric cancer. J Clin Oncol. 26: pp. 3248-3258 CrossRef
- ACS Cancer Facts and Figures 2013. www.cancer.org/Research/CancerFactsFigures. Accessed 19 Mar 2013.
- Woodward, C, Chambers, L (1986) Guide to questionnaire construction and question writing. Canadian Public Health Association, Ottawa
- Dillman, D (2000) Mail and internet surveys: the tailored design method. Wiley, New York
- Sommer, CA, Stitzenberg, KB, Tolleson-Rinehart, S, Carpenter, WR, Carey, TS (2011) Breast MRI utilization in older patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer. J Surg Res. 170: pp. 77-83 CrossRef
- Hwang, N, Schiller, DE, Crystal, P, Maki, E, McCready, DR (2009) Magnetic resonance imaging in the planning of initial lumpectomy for invasive breast carcinoma: its effect on ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence after breast-conservation therapy. Ann Surg Oncol. 16: pp. 3000-3009 CrossRef
- Turnbull, L, Brown, S, Harvey, I, Olivier, C, Drew, P, Napp, V (2010) Comparative effectiveness of MRI in breast cancer (COMICE) trial: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 375: pp. 563-571 CrossRef
- Peters, NH, Esser, S, Bosch, MA, Storm, RK, Plaisier, PW, Dalen, T (2011) Preoperative MRI and surgical management in patients with nonpalpable breast cancer: the MONET—randomised controlled trial. Eur J Cancer. 47: pp. 879-886 CrossRef
- Houssami, N, Hayes, DF (2009) Review of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in breast cancer: should MRI be performed on all women with newly diagnosed, early stage breast cancer?. CA Cancer J Clin. 59: pp. 290-302 CrossRef
- Solin, LJ, Orel, SG, Hwang, WT, Harris, EE, Schnall, MD (2008) Relationship of breast magnetic resonance imaging to outcome after breast-conservation treatment with radiation for women with early-stage invasive breast carcinoma or ductal carcinoma in situ. J Clin Oncol. 26: pp. 386-391 CrossRef
- Boyd, NF, Martin, LJ, Bronskill, M, Yaffe, MJ, Duric, N, Minkin, S (2010) Breast tissue composition and susceptibility to breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 102: pp. 1224-1237 CrossRef
- Dillon, MF, Hill, AD, Fleming, FJ, O’Doherty, A, Quinn, CM, McDermott, EW (2006) Identifying patients at risk of compromised margins following breast conservation for lobular carcinoma. Am J Surg. 191: pp. 201-205 CrossRef
- Mann, RM, Hoogeveen, YL, Blickman, JG, Boetes, C (2008) MRI compared to conventional diagnostic work-up in the detection and evaluation of invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast: a review of existing literature. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 107: pp. 1-14 CrossRef
- Sastre-Garau, X, Jouve, M, Asselain, B, Vincent-Salomon, A, Beuzeboc, P, Dorval, T (1996) Infiltrating lobular carcinoma of the breast. Clinicopathologic analysis of 975 cases with reference to data on conservative therapy and metastatic patterns. Cancer. 77: pp. 113-120 CrossRef
- Santiago, RJ, Harris, EE, Qin, L, Hwang, WT, Solin, LJ (2005) Similar long-term results of breast-conservation treatment for stage I and II invasive lobular carcinoma compared with invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast: The University of Pennsylvania experience. Cancer. 103: pp. 2447-2454 CrossRef
- McGhan, LJ, Wasif, N, Gray, RJ, Giurescu, ME, Pizzitola, VJ, Lorans, R (2010) Use of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging for invasive lobular cancer: good, better, but maybe not the best?. Ann Surg Oncol. 17: pp. 255-262 CrossRef
- Mann, RM, Loo, CE, Wobbes, T, Bult, P, Barentsz, JO, Gilhuijs, KG (2010) The impact of preoperative breast MRI on the re-excision rate in invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 119: pp. 415-422 CrossRef
- Heywang, SH, Fenzl, G, Hahn, D, Krischke, I, Edmaier, M, Eiermann, W (1986) MR imaging of the breast: comparison with mammography and ultrasound. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 10: pp. 615-620 CrossRef
- Heywang, SH, Hahn, D, Schmidt, H, Krischke, I, Eiermann, W, Bassermann, R (1986) MR imaging of the breast using gadolinium-DTPA. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 10: pp. 199-204 CrossRef
- Kaiser, WA (1992) MRM promises earlier breast cancer diagnosis. Diagn Imaging (San Franc). 14: pp. 88-93
- Gilles, R, Guinebretiere, JM, Lucidarme, O, Cluzel, P, Janaud, G, Finet, JF (1994) Nonpalpable breast tumors: diagnosis with contrast-enhanced subtraction dynamic MR imaging. Radiology. 191: pp. 625-631
- Kuhl, CK, Mielcareck, P, Klaschik, S, Leutner, C, Wardelmann, E, Gieseke, J (1999) Dynamic breast MR imaging: are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions?. Radiology. 211: pp. 101-110
- Bassett, LW, Dhaliwal, SG, Eradat, J, Khan, O, Farria, DF, Brenner, RJ (2008) National trends and practices in breast MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 191: pp. 332-339 CrossRef
- Barringer B. University of Virginia Health System Dept of Revenue Cycle. Personal communication, September, 2011.
- Moore, SG, Shenoy, PJ, Fanucchi, L, Tumeh, JW, Flowers, CR (2009) Cost-effectiveness of MRI compared to mammography for breast cancer screening in a high risk population. BMC Health Serv Res. 9: pp. 9 CrossRef
- Asch, DA, Jedrziewski, MK, Christakis, NA (1997) Response rates to mail surveys published in medical journals. J Clin Epidemiol. 50: pp. 1129-1136 CrossRef
- Lazovich, D, Solomon, CC, Thomas, DB, Moe, RE, White, E (1999) Breast conservation therapy in the United States following the 1990 National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference on the treatment of patients with early stage invasive breast carcinoma. Cancer. 86: pp. 628-637 CrossRef
- MRI Utilization in Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer: A Survey of Practicing Surgeons
Annals of Surgical Oncology
Volume 20, Issue 8 , pp 2600-2606
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer US
- Additional Links
- Industry Sectors