Racial Disparities in Immediate Breast Reconstruction After Mastectomy: Impact of State and Federal Health Policy Changes
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Federal and Pennsylvania state policies instituted in the late 1990s were designed to improve access to postmastectomy breast reconstruction. We sought to evaluate the impact of these policy changes on access to care among racial minorities.
Mastectomy patients ≥18 years old were identified in the Pennsylvania Health Care Cost Containment Council inpatient database (1994–2004) and classified by immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) status. Rates of IBR were calculated by patient characteristics and year. Patients were stratified by race before (1994–1997) and after (2001–2004) policy changes, and relative odds of IBR were estimated by univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses with adjustment for known confounders.
Overall rates of IBR were significantly higher in the time period after policy change compared to before policy change (18.5 vs. 32.7 %, p < 0.01). White, black, and Asian patients all saw a significant rise in rates of IBR. However, after adjustment for potential confounders, black patients, Asian patients, and those of mixed or other races all remained less likely to undergo IBR when compared to white patients after policy changes (odds ratio [OR] 0.66, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.55–0.80; OR 0.30, 95 % CI 0.18–0.49; OR 0.29, 95 % CI 0.16–0.51, respectively).
Rates of IBR increased across all racial groups after policy changes. However, not all races were affected equally, and thus disparities remained. Future studies are needed to investigate the role of other factors, including cultural preferences in utilization of IBR that might explain residual disparities.
- National Cancer Institute. SEER stat fact sheets: breast. http://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/breast.html. Accessed 14 Jan 2012.
- Stevens, LA, McGrath, MH, Druss, RG, Kister, SJ, Gump, FE, Forde, KA (1984) The psychological impact of immediate breast reconstruction for women with early breast cancer. Plast Reconstr Surg. 73: pp. 619-628 CrossRef
- Schain, WS (1991) Breast reconstruction. Update of psychosocial and pragmatic concerns. Cancer. 68: pp. 1170-1175 CrossRef
- Downes, KJ, Glatt, BS, Kanchwala, SK (2005) Skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate reconstruction is an acceptable treatment option for patients with high-risk breast carcinoma. Cancer. 103: pp. 906-913 CrossRef
- Polednak, AP (2000) Geographic variation in postmastectomy breast reconstruction rates. Plast Reconstr Surg. 106: pp. 298-301 CrossRef
- DeSantis, C, Siegel, R, Bandi, P, Jemal, A (2011) Breast cancer statistics, 2011. CA Cancer J Clin. 61: pp. 408-418 CrossRef
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program (NBCCEDP). http://www.cdc.gov/cancer/nbccedp/about.htm. Accessed 15 July 2011.
- Wilkins, EG, Alderman, AK (2004) Breast reconstruction practices in North America: current trends and future priorities. Semin Plast Surg. 18: pp. 149-155 CrossRef
- Pennsylvania Breast Cancer Coalition. Legislative victories. http://www.pabreastcancer.org/legislative_advocacy/victories/. Accessed 2 Nov 2011.
- Morrow, M, Mujahid, M, Lantz, PM (2005) Correlates of breast reconstruction: results from a population-based study. Cancer. 104: pp. 2340-2346 CrossRef
- Alderman, AK, McMahon, L, Wilkins, EG (2003) The national utilization of immediate and early delayed breast reconstruction and the effect of sociodemographic factors. Plast Reconstr Surg. 111: pp. 695-703 CrossRef
- Pennsylvania Health Care Cost Containment Council. PHC4 FYI—PHC4 “Special Requests”: a valuable investment. http://www.phc4.org/reports/fyi/fyi8.htm. Accessed 20 Dec 2011.
- Pennsylvania Health Care Cost Containment Council. Pennsylvania uniform claims and billing form reporting manual. http://www.phc4.org/dept/dc/adobe/ub04inpatient.pdf. Accessed 10 Dec 2011.
- Southern, DA, Quan, H, Ghali, WA (2004) Comparison of the Elixhauser and Charlson/Deyo methods of comorbidity measurement in administrative data. Med Care. 42: pp. 355-360 CrossRef
- Clegg, LX, Li, FP, Hankey, BF, Chu, K, Edwards, BK (2002) Cancer survival among U.S. whites and minorities: a SEER (Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results) Program population-based study. Arch Intern Med. 162: pp. 1985-1993 CrossRef
- Eley, JW, Hill, HA, Chen, VW (1994) Racial differences in survival from breast cancer: results of the National Cancer Institute Black/White Cancer Survival Study. JAMA. 272: pp. 947-954 CrossRef
- Ragland, KE, Selvin, S, Merrill, DW (1991) Black–white differences in stage-specific cancer survival: analysis of seven selected sites. Am J Epidemiol. 133: pp. 672-682
- Bassett, MT, Krieger, N (1986) Social class and black–white differences in breast cancer survival. Am J Public Health. 76: pp. 1400-1403 CrossRef
- Dayal, HH, Power, RN, Chiu, C (1982) Race and socio-economic status in survival from breast cancer. J Chronic Dis. 35: pp. 675-683 CrossRef
- U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Minority Health. Asian American/Pacific Islander profile. http://minorityhealth.hhs.gov/templates/browse.aspx?lvl=2&lvlID=53. Accessed 7 Feb 2012.
- Finlayson, CA, MacDermott, TA, Arya, J (2001) Can specific preoperative counseling increase the likelihood a woman will choose postmastectomy breast reconstruction?. Am J Surg. 182: pp. 649-653 CrossRef
- Katipamula, R, Degnim, AC, Hoskin, T (2009) Trends in mastectomy rates at the Mayo Clinic Rochester: effect of surgical year and preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. J Clin Oncol. 27: pp. 4082-4088 CrossRef
- McGuire, KP, Santillan, AA, Kaur, P (2009) Are mastectomies on the rise? A 13-year trend analysis of the selection of mastectomy versus breast conservation therapy in 5865 patients. Ann Surg Oncol. 16: pp. 2682-2690 CrossRef
- Bagley, FH (2004) The role of magnetic resonance imaging mammography in the surgical management of the index breast cancer. Arch Surg. 139: pp. 380-383 CrossRef
- Bilimoria, KY, Cambic, A, Hansen, NM, Bethke, KP (2007) Evaluating the impact of preoperative breast magnetic resonance imaging on the surgical management of newly diagnosed breast cancers. Arch Surg. 142: pp. 441-447 CrossRef
- Chan, A, Pintilie, M, Vallis, K, Girourd, C, Goss, P (2000) Breast cancer in women < or = 35 years: review of 1002 cases from a single institution. Ann Oncol. 11: pp. 1255-1262 CrossRef
- Champaneria, MC, Wong, WW, Hill, ME, Gupta, SC (2012) The evolution of breast reconstruction: a historical perspective. World J Surg. 36: pp. 730-742 CrossRef
- Fancher, TT, Palesty, JA, Thomas, R (2009) A woman’s influence to choose mastectomy as treatment for breast cancer. J Surg Res. 153: pp. 128-131 CrossRef
- Bian, J, Krontiras, H, Allison, J (2008) Outpatient mastectomy and breast reconstructive surgery. Ann Surg Oncol. 15: pp. 1032-1039 CrossRef
- Guyomard, V, Leinster, S, Wilkinson, M (2007) Systematic review of studies of patients’ satisfaction with breast reconstruction after mastectomy. Breast. 16: pp. 547-567 CrossRef
- Malmgren, JA, Parikh, J, Atwood, MK, Kaplan, HG (2012) Impact of mammography detection on the course of breast cancer in women aged 40–49 years. Radiology. 262: pp. 797-806 CrossRef
- Selber, JC, Kurichi, JE, Vega, SJ, Sonnad, SS, Serletti, JM (2006) Risk factors and complications in free TRAM flap breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 56: pp. 492-497 CrossRef
- Mehrara, BJ, Santoro, TD, Arcilla, E, Watson, JP, Shaw, WW, Lio, AL (2006) Complications after microvascular breast reconstruction: experience with 1195 flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg. 118: pp. 1100-1101 CrossRef
- Racial Disparities in Immediate Breast Reconstruction After Mastectomy: Impact of State and Federal Health Policy Changes
Annals of Surgical Oncology
Volume 20, Issue 2 , pp 399-406
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Department of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA