Racial Disparities in Immediate Breast Reconstruction After Mastectomy: Impact of State and Federal Health Policy Changes
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Federal and Pennsylvania state policies instituted in the late 1990s were designed to improve access to postmastectomy breast reconstruction. We sought to evaluate the impact of these policy changes on access to care among racial minorities.
Mastectomy patients ≥18 years old were identified in the Pennsylvania Health Care Cost Containment Council inpatient database (1994–2004) and classified by immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) status. Rates of IBR were calculated by patient characteristics and year. Patients were stratified by race before (1994–1997) and after (2001–2004) policy changes, and relative odds of IBR were estimated by univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses with adjustment for known confounders.
Overall rates of IBR were significantly higher in the time period after policy change compared to before policy change (18.5 vs. 32.7 %, p < 0.01). White, black, and Asian patients all saw a significant rise in rates of IBR. However, after adjustment for potential confounders, black patients, Asian patients, and those of mixed or other races all remained less likely to undergo IBR when compared to white patients after policy changes (odds ratio [OR] 0.66, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.55–0.80; OR 0.30, 95 % CI 0.18–0.49; OR 0.29, 95 % CI 0.16–0.51, respectively).
Rates of IBR increased across all racial groups after policy changes. However, not all races were affected equally, and thus disparities remained. Future studies are needed to investigate the role of other factors, including cultural preferences in utilization of IBR that might explain residual disparities.
- National Cancer Institute. SEER stat fact sheets: breast. http://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/breast.html. Accessed 14 Jan 2012.
- Stevens LA, McGrath MH, Druss RG, Kister SJ, Gump FE, Forde KA. The psychological impact of immediate breast reconstruction for women with early breast cancer. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1984;73:619–28. CrossRef
- Schain WS. Breast reconstruction. Update of psychosocial and pragmatic concerns. Cancer. 1991;68:1170–5. CrossRef
- Downes KJ, Glatt BS, Kanchwala SK, et al. Skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate reconstruction is an acceptable treatment option for patients with high-risk breast carcinoma. Cancer. 2005;103:906–13. CrossRef
- Polednak AP. Geographic variation in postmastectomy breast reconstruction rates. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;106:298–301. CrossRef
- DeSantis C, Siegel R, Bandi P, Jemal A. Breast cancer statistics, 2011. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011;61:408–18. CrossRef
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program (NBCCEDP). http://www.cdc.gov/cancer/nbccedp/about.htm. Accessed 15 July 2011.
- Wilkins EG, Alderman AK. Breast reconstruction practices in North America: current trends and future priorities. Semin Plast Surg. 2004;18:149–55. CrossRef
- Pennsylvania Breast Cancer Coalition. Legislative victories. http://www.pabreastcancer.org/legislative_advocacy/victories/. Accessed 2 Nov 2011.
- Morrow M, Mujahid M, Lantz PM, et al. Correlates of breast reconstruction: results from a population-based study. Cancer. 2005;104:2340–6. CrossRef
- Alderman AK, McMahon L Jr, Wilkins EG. The national utilization of immediate and early delayed breast reconstruction and the effect of sociodemographic factors. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;111:695–703. CrossRef
- Pennsylvania Health Care Cost Containment Council. PHC4 FYI—PHC4 “Special Requests”: a valuable investment. http://www.phc4.org/reports/fyi/fyi8.htm. Accessed 20 Dec 2011.
- Pennsylvania Health Care Cost Containment Council. Pennsylvania uniform claims and billing form reporting manual. http://www.phc4.org/dept/dc/adobe/ub04inpatient.pdf. Accessed 10 Dec 2011.
- Southern DA, Quan H, Ghali WA. Comparison of the Elixhauser and Charlson/Deyo methods of comorbidity measurement in administrative data. Med Care. 2004;42:355–60. CrossRef
- Clegg LX, Li FP, Hankey BF, Chu K, Edwards BK. Cancer survival among U.S. whites and minorities: a SEER (Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results) Program population-based study. Arch Intern Med. 2002;162:1985–93. CrossRef
- Eley JW, Hill HA, Chen VW, et al. Racial differences in survival from breast cancer: results of the National Cancer Institute Black/White Cancer Survival Study. JAMA. 1994;272:947–54. CrossRef
- Ragland KE, Selvin S, Merrill DW. Black–white differences in stage-specific cancer survival: analysis of seven selected sites. Am J Epidemiol. 1991;133:672–82.
- Bassett MT, Krieger N. Social class and black–white differences in breast cancer survival. Am J Public Health. 1986;76:1400–3. CrossRef
- Dayal HH, Power RN, Chiu C. Race and socio-economic status in survival from breast cancer. J Chronic Dis. 1982;35:675–83. CrossRef
- U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Minority Health. Asian American/Pacific Islander profile. http://minorityhealth.hhs.gov/templates/browse.aspx?lvl=2&lvlID=53. Accessed 7 Feb 2012.
- Finlayson CA, MacDermott TA, Arya J. Can specific preoperative counseling increase the likelihood a woman will choose postmastectomy breast reconstruction? Am J Surg. 2001;182:649–53. CrossRef
- Katipamula R, Degnim AC, Hoskin T, et al. Trends in mastectomy rates at the Mayo Clinic Rochester: effect of surgical year and preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:4082–8. CrossRef
- McGuire KP, Santillan AA, Kaur P, et al. Are mastectomies on the rise? A 13-year trend analysis of the selection of mastectomy versus breast conservation therapy in 5865 patients. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16:2682–90. CrossRef
- Bagley FH. The role of magnetic resonance imaging mammography in the surgical management of the index breast cancer. Arch Surg. 2004;139:380–3. CrossRef
- Bilimoria KY, Cambic A, Hansen NM, Bethke KP. Evaluating the impact of preoperative breast magnetic resonance imaging on the surgical management of newly diagnosed breast cancers. Arch Surg. 2007;142:441–7. CrossRef
- Chan A, Pintilie M, Vallis K, Girourd C, Goss P. Breast cancer in women < or =35 years: review of 1002 cases from a single institution. Ann Oncol. 2000;11:1255–62. CrossRef
- Champaneria MC, Wong WW, Hill ME, Gupta SC. The evolution of breast reconstruction: a historical perspective. World J Surg. 2012;36:730–42. CrossRef
- Fancher TT, Palesty JA, Thomas R, et al. A woman’s influence to choose mastectomy as treatment for breast cancer. J Surg Res. 2009;153:128–31. CrossRef
- Bian J, Krontiras H, Allison J. Outpatient mastectomy and breast reconstructive surgery. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15:1032–9. CrossRef
- Guyomard V, Leinster S, Wilkinson M. Systematic review of studies of patients’ satisfaction with breast reconstruction after mastectomy. Breast. 2007;16:547–67. CrossRef
- Malmgren JA, Parikh J, Atwood MK, Kaplan HG. Impact of mammography detection on the course of breast cancer in women aged 40–49 years. Radiology. 2012;262:797–806. CrossRef
- Selber JC, Kurichi JE, Vega SJ, Sonnad SS, Serletti JM. Risk factors and complications in free TRAM flap breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2006;56:492–7. CrossRef
- Mehrara BJ, Santoro TD, Arcilla E, Watson JP, Shaw WW, Da Lio AL. Complications after microvascular breast reconstruction: experience with 1195 flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;118:1100–1. CrossRef
- Racial Disparities in Immediate Breast Reconstruction After Mastectomy: Impact of State and Federal Health Policy Changes
Annals of Surgical Oncology
Volume 20, Issue 2 , pp 399-406
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Department of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA