Factors Associated with Variance in Compliance with a Sentinel Lymph Node Dissection Quality Measure in Early-Stage Breast Cancer
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Guidelines recommend sentinel lymph node dissection (SLND) for patients with clinical stage I/IIA/IIB breast cancer; however, a significant fraction of patients do not undergo this procedure. We sought to identify factors associated with noncompliance with the SLND benchmark in early-stage breast cancer.
Materials and Methods
All patients with an initial diagnosis of Stage I/IIA/IIB invasive breast carcinoma who were treated between 2004 and 2007 with records in the California Cancer Registry were evaluated. Odds ratios evaluating receipt of SLND were compared for sex, age, stage, socioeconomic status (SES), race/ethnicity, surgery type, year of diagnosis, and hospital cancer program approval from the American College of Surgery (ACOS).
Of 55,207 patients identified, 66% underwent SLND. On multivariable analyses, patients were significantly less likely to undergo SLND if they were >65 years of age, stage IIA or IIB, of lower socioeconomic status, of nonwhite race/ethnicity, treated with total mastectomy, treated during 2004–2005, or at a non-ACOS approved institution.
SLND use in California has increased over time; however, only two-thirds of eligible patients undergo this recommended procedure. Using SLND as a quality measure demonstrates significant disparities that have implications not only for patient and provider education, but also for health care policy and reform.
- Goyal, A, Newcombe, RG, Chhabra, A, Mansel, RE (2006) ALMANAC Trialists Group. Factors affecting failed localisation and false-negative rates of sentinel node biopsy in breast cancer—results of the ALMANAC validation phase. Breast Cancer Res Treat 99: pp. 203-208 CrossRef
- Krag, D, Weaver, D, Ashikaga, T, Moffat, F, Klimberg, VS, Shriver, C (1998) The sentinel node in breast cancer–a multicenter validation study. N Engl J Med. 339: pp. 941-946 CrossRef
- Blanchard, DK, Donohue, JH, Reynolds, C, Grant, CS (2003) Relapse and morbidity in patients undergoing sentinel lymph node biopsy alone or with axillary dissection for breast cancer. Arch Surg. 138: pp. 482-487 CrossRef
- Lyman, GH, Giuliano, AE, Somerfield, MR, Benson, AB, Bodurka, DC, Burstein, HJ (2005) American Society of Clinical Oncology guideline recommendations for sentinel lymph node biopsy in early-stage breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 23: pp. 7703-7720 CrossRef
- Gill, G (2009) Sentinel-lymph-node-based management or routine axillary clearance? One-year outcomes of sentinel node biopsy versus axillary clearance (SNAC): a randomized controlled surgical trial. Ann Surg Oncol. 16: pp. 266-275 CrossRef
- NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology Breast Cancer v.2.2010. Available: http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/PDF/breast.pdf/. Accessed 20 Apr 2010.
- Malin, JL, Schneider, EC, Epstein, AM, Adams, J, Emanuel, EJ, Kahn, KL (2006) Results of the National Initiative for Cancer Care Quality: how can we improve the quality of caner care in the United States?. J Clin Oncol. 24: pp. 626-635 CrossRef
- Percentage of women with Stage I-IIb breast cancer that received either axillary node dissection or Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy (SLNB) at the time of surgery (lumpectomy or mastectomy). Available: http://www.qualityforum.org/Measures_List.aspx#k=breast%2520cancer&e=1&st=&sd=&s=&p=1. Accessed 20 Apr 2010.
- Breast Center Standards Manual. Available: http://accreditedbreastcenters.org/standards/2009standardsmanual.pdf. Accessed 20 Apr 2010.
- Chen, AY, Halpern, MT, Schrag, NM, Stewart, A, Leitch, M, Ward, E (2008) Disparities and trends in sentinel lymph node biopsy among early-stage breast cancer patients (1998–2005). J Natl Cancer Inst. 100: pp. 462-474 CrossRef
- Yost, K, Perkins, C, Cohen, R, Morris, C, Wright, W (2001) Socioeconomic status and breast cancer incidence in California for different race/ethnic groups. Cancer Causes Control. 12: pp. 703-711 CrossRef
- Truong, PT, Bernstein, V, Wai, E, Chua, B, Speers, C, Olivotto, IA (2002) Age-related variations in the use of axillary dissection: a survival analysis of 8038 women with T1-ST2 breast cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 54: pp. 794-803 CrossRef
- Edge, SB, Niland, JC, Bookman, MA, Theriault, RL, Ottesen, R, Lepisto, E (2003) Emergence of sentinel node biopsy in breast cancer as standard-of-care in academic comprehensive cancer centers. J Natl Cancer Inst. 95: pp. 1514-1521
- Gobbi, PG, Broglia, C, Carnevale Maffe, G, Ruga, A, Molinari, E, Ascari, E (2002) Lymphomatous superficial lymph nodes: limitations of physical examination for accurate staging and response assessment. Haematologica. 87: pp. 1151-1156
- Bilimoria, KY, Balch, CM, Wayne, JD, Chang, DC, Palis, BE, Dy, SM (2009) Health care system and socioeconomic factors associated with variance in use of sentinel lymph node biopsy for melanoma in the United States. J Clin Oncol. 27: pp. 1857-1863 CrossRef
- Naik, AM, Joseph, K, Harris, M, Davis, C, Shapiro, R, Hiotis, KL (2003) Indigent breast cancer patients among all racial and ethnic groups present with more advance disease compared with nationally reported data. Am J Surg. 186: pp. 400-403 CrossRef
- Rescigno, J, Zampell, JC, Axelrod, D (2009) Patterns of axillary surgical care for breast cancer in the era of sentinel lymph node biopsy. Ann Surg Oncol. 16: pp. 687-696 CrossRef
- California QuickFacts from the US Census Bureau. Available: http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/06000.html. Accessed 20 Apr 2010.
- Tan, J, Bagnell, M, Morgan, J, Wong, JH, Roy-Chowdhury, S, Lum, SS (2009) The identification and treatment of isolated tumor cells reflect disparities in the delivery of breast cancer care. Am J Surg. 198: pp. 508-510 CrossRef
- Olaya, W, Wong, JH, Morgan, JW, Roy-Chowdhury, S, Lum, SS (2009) Disparities in the surgical management of women with stage I breast cancer. Am Surg. 75: pp. 869-872
- Tan, MP (2006) Surmounting the challenges of sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast cancer in non-tertiary centres and community-based practices. ANZ J Surg. 76: pp. 306-309 CrossRef
- Zork, NM, Komenaka, IK, Pennington, RE, Bowling, MW, Norton, LE, Clare, SE (2008) The effect of dedicated breast surgeons on the short-term outcomes in breast cancer. Ann Surg. 248: pp. 280-285 CrossRef
- Rao, R, Lilley, L, Andrews, V, Radford, L, Ulissey, M (2009) Axillary staging by percutaneous biopsy: sensitivity of fine-needle aspiration versus core needle biopsy. Ann Surg Oncol. 16: pp. 1170-1175 CrossRef
- McCahill, LE, Privette, A, James, T, Sheehey-Jones, J, Ratliff, J, Majercik, D (2009) Quality measures for breast cancer surgery: initial validation of feasibility and assessment of variation among surgeons. Arch Surg. 144: pp. 455-462 CrossRef
- Factors Associated with Variance in Compliance with a Sentinel Lymph Node Dissection Quality Measure in Early-Stage Breast Cancer
Annals of Surgical Oncology
Volume 17, Issue 3 Supplement, pp 297-302
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Loma Linda University School of Medicine, Loma Linda, CA, USA
- 2. School of Public Health, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA, USA
- 3. California Cancer Registry, Desert Sierra Cancer Surveillance Program, Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, CA, USA