Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Survival Among Patients with Platinum Resistant, Locally Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Treated with Platinum-Based Systemic Therapy

  • Translational Research and Biomarkers
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Recent adjuvant chemotherapy trials after resection of stage II and III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have identified important survival differences among patients with immunohistochemical evidence suggesting platinum resistance. No clinical information exists regarding the impact upon survival of patients treated with platinum agents who exhibit cellular evidence of their tumors’ resistance to platinum. We evaluated the utility of the extreme drug resistance (EDR) assay to predict mortality among a consecutive group of stage II through IV NSCLC patients receiving adjuvant or definitive platinum-based chemotherapy after resection or surgical biopsy.

Methods

The Extreme Drug Resistance (EDR) Assay is a clinically validated cellular proliferation assay used to test tumors for chemotherapy drug resistance. Based on response in the EDR assay, tumor specimens from stage II through IV NSCLC patients were segregated into three groups: extreme drug resistant (EDR), intermediate drug resistant (IDR), and low drug resistant (LDR). Patient survival was evaluated after platinum-based chemotherapy.

Results

Platinum IDR/EDR was statistically significant in predicting shorter overall survival (29.8 months vs. 15.6 months) among platinum IDR/EDR-resistant patients compared with LDR patients (P = 0.047). Median survival was 16.6 months for patients with IDR/EDR to platinum and any other second agent of doublet therapy compared with patients with LDR to any platinum-based doublet where median survival was not achieved (P = 0.0268).

Conclusions

This is the first study to demonstrate the utility of the EDR assay to predict poor clinical outcome when platinum-based therapy is used to treat patients with biological evidence of tumor resistance to platinum. These data corroborate the finding of recent studies evaluating possible molecular correlates to poor response to specific chemotherapeutic agents.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. American Cancer Society. Cancer facts & figures 2008. American Cancer Society, Atlanta, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Mountain CF. Revisions in the international system for staging lung cancer. Chest. 1997;111:1710–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Winton TL, Livingston R, Johnson D, et al. A prospective randomized trial of adjuvant vinorelbine (VIN) and cisplatin (CIS) in completely resected stage 1B and II non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) Intergroup JBR.10. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:2289–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Douillard J, Rosell R, Delena M, et al. ANITA: phase III adjuvant vinorelbine (N) and cisplatin (P) versus observation (OBS) in completely resected (stage I–III) non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients (pts): final results after 70-month median follow-up. On behalf of the Adjuvant Navelbine International Trialist Association. ASCO annual meeting proceedings, Orlando, Florida, USA. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:7013.

  5. Olaussen KA, Dunant A, Fouret P, Brambilla E, et al. DNA Repair by ERCC1 in non-small-cell lung cancer and cisplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:983–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Mehta R, Bomstein R, Yu I-R, et al. Breast cancer survival and in vitro tumor response in the extreme drug resistance assay. Breast Cancer Res Treatment. 2001;66:225–37.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Holloway R, Mehta R, Finkler N, et al. Association between in vitro platinum resistance in the EDR assay and clinical outcomes for ovarian cancer patients. Gynecol Oncol. 2002;87:8–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Parker RJ, Fruehauf JP, Mehta R, et al. A prospective blinded study of predictive value of extreme drug resistance assay in patients receiving CPT-11 for recurrent glioma. J Neuro-Oncol. 2004;66:365–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. d’Amato TA, Landreneau RJ, McKenna RJ, et al. Prevalence of in vitro extreme chemotherapy resistance in resected non-small cell lung cancer. Ann Thor Surg. 2006;81:440–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. d’Amato TA, Landreneau RJ, Ricketts W, Huang W, et al. Chemotherapy resistance and oncogene expression in non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007;133:352–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Greene FL, Page DL, Fleming ID, et. al. AJCC cancer staging manual, 6th ed. Springer-Verlag, New York, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Schiller J, Harrington D, Belani C, et al. Comparison of four chemotherapy regimens for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:92–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kern D, Weisenthal L. Highly specific prediction of antineoplastic drug resistance with an in vitro assay using suprapharacologic drug exposures. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1990;82:582–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Wilbur DW, Camacho ES, Hilliard DA, et al. Chemotherapy of non-small cell lung carcinoma guided by an in vitro drug resistance assay measuring total tumour cell kill. Br J Cancer. 1992;65:27–32.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Moon YW, Choi SH, Kim YT, Sohn JH, et al. Adenosine triphosphate-based chemotherapy response assay (ATP-CRA)-guided platinum-based 2-drug chemotherapy for unresectable non-small-cell lung cancer. Cancer. 2007;109:1829–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Langer CJ, Stephenson P, Thor A, et al. Trastuzumab in the treatment of advanced non–small-cell lung cancer: is there a role? Focus on Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Study 2598 J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:1180–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Pignon JP, Tribodet H, Scagliotti GV, Douillard JY, et al. Lung adjuvant cisplatin evaluation: a pooled analysis by the lace collaborative group. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:3552–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Tsao MS, Aviel-Ronen S, Ding K, Lau D, et al. Prognostic and predictive importance of p53 and ras for adjuvant chemotherapy in non small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:5240–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Riely GJ, Marks J, Pao W. KRAS mutations in non-small cell lung cancer. Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2009;6:201–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Potti A, Mukherjee S, Petersen R, et al. A genomic strategy to refine prognosis in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:570–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Chen HY, Yu SL, Chen CH, Chang GC, et al. A five-gene signature and clinical outcome in non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:11–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Boutros PC, Lau SK, Pintilie M, Liu N, et al. Prognostic gene signatures for non-small-cell lung cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2009;106:2824–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Schwartz AM, Henson DE. Diagnostic surgical pathology in lung cancer: ACCP evidence-based clinical practice guidelines, 2nd ed. Chest. 2007;132(3 Suppl):78S–93S.

  24. d’Amato TA. Adjuvant chemotherapy and the role of chemoresistance testing for stage I non-small cell lung cancer. Thorac Surg Clin. 2007;17:287–99.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Strauss G, Herndon J, Maddaus M, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy in stage IB non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): Update of Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) protocol 9633. ASCO Annual Meeting Proceedings Part I. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(18S):7007.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Forum Health—Western Reserve Health System, Youngstown, OH, USA

    Thomas A. d’Amato MD, PhD

  2. University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA

    Brian L. Pettiford MD, Mathew J. Schuchert MD, James D. Luketich MD & Rodney J. Landreneau MD

  3. Oncotech, Inc., Tustin, CA, USA

    Ricardo Parker PhD & William A. Ricketts PhD

Authors
  1. Thomas A. d’Amato MD, PhD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Brian L. Pettiford MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mathew J. Schuchert MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ricardo Parker PhD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. William A. Ricketts PhD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. James D. Luketich MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Rodney J. Landreneau MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas A. d’Amato MD, PhD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

d’Amato, T.A., Pettiford, B.L., Schuchert, M.J. et al. Survival Among Patients with Platinum Resistant, Locally Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Treated with Platinum-Based Systemic Therapy. Ann Surg Oncol 16, 2848–2855 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-009-0608-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-009-0608-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation