Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Predicting Life Expectancy and Symptom Relief Following Surgery for Advanced Malignancy

  • Healthcare Policy and Outcomes
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

We prospectively evaluated surgeons’ ability to predict outcomes of life expectancy and symptom relief following major surgery for patients with advanced malignancies.

Methods

Fifty-seven patients with advanced malignancies were evaluated regarding major symptoms requiring a surgical intervention and followed until death or last contact. The patients’ surgeons answered questions preoperatively and postoperatively, relating to issues such as estimated survival time and likelihood of symptom relief following surgery. We compared these estimates with patients’ clinical outcomes and responses to a symptom questionnaire completed just prior to surgery, and 2 weeks, 6 weeks, and 3 months following surgery.

Results

Surgeons’ preoperative estimates of patient survival agreed with survival outcomes. Preoperatively, surgeons accurately identified cases where a patient was expected to live less than 1 year without surgery (P < 0.0001) and with surgery (P = 0.0342). Surgeons’ preoperative estimates of the success of symptom improvement following surgery did not correlate in general with patients’ self-assessments (P = 0.6454). Specifically, surgeons underestimated their success in symptom resolution. However, there were statistically significant differences between patients who were judged by surgeons postoperatively to have mild or no palliation compared with those with excellent (P = 0.0372) and good (P = 0.0203) palliation.

Conclusion

Preoperatively, surgeons accurately estimated patients’ survival time with surgery. Surgeons’ postoperative estimates of success of symptom relief agreed with patients’ self-assessments. Preoperatively, surgeons tended to underestimate their patients’ symptom relief. Surgeons may wish to consider other criteria than their predictions for symptom relief in deciding whether a patient is a candidate for palliative surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Markus PM, Martell J, Leister I et al. Predicting postoperative morbidity by clinical assessment. Br J Surg 2005;92:101–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Hartley MN, Sagar PM. The surgeon’s ‘gut feeling’ as a predictor of post-operative outcome. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1994;76:277–8

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. McCahill LE, Smith DD, Borneman T et al. A prospective evaluation of palliative outcomes for surgery of advanced malignancies. Ann Surg Oncol 2003;10:654–63

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Portenoy RK, Thaler HT, Kornblith AB et al. The Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale: an instrument for the evaluation of symptom prevalence, characteristics and distress. Eur J Cancer 1994;30A:1326–36

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Krouse RS, Nelson RA, Farrell BR et al. Surgical palliation at a cancer center: incidence and outcomes. Arch Surg 2001;136:773–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. McCahill LE, Krouse R, Chu D et al. Indications and use of palliative surgery-results of Society of Surgical Oncology survey. Ann Surg Oncol 2002;9:104–12

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. McCahill LE, Krouse RS, Chu DZ et al. Decision making in palliative surgery. J Am Coll Surg 2002;195:411–22; discussion 422–3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Miner TJ, Jaques DP, Shriver CD. A prospective evaluation of patients undergoing surgery for the palliation of an advanced malignancy. Ann Surg Oncol 2002;9:696–703

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rosen SA, Buell JF, Yoshida A, et al. Initial presentation with stage IV colorectal cancer: how aggressive should we be? Arch Surg 2000;135:530–4; discussion 534–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Joffe J, Gordon PH. Palliative resection for colorectal carcinoma. Dis Colon Rectum 1981;24:355–60

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Makela J, Haukipuro K, Laitinen S et al. Palliative operations for colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 1990;33:846–50

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Popiela T, Kedra B, Sierzega M et al. [Surgical palliation for pancreatic cancer. The 25-year experience of a single reference centre]. Zentralbl Chir 2002;127:965–70

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Bonenkamp JJ, Sasako M, Hermans J et al. Tumor load and surgical palliation in gastric cancer. Hepatogastroenterology 2001;48:1219–21

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Miner TJ. Palliative surgery for advanced cancer: lessons learned in patient selection and outcome assessment. Am J Clin Oncol 2005;28:411–4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Podnos YD, Juarez G, Pameijer C et al. Impact of surgical palliation on quality of life in patients with advanced malignancy: results of the decisions and outcomes in palliative surgery (DOPS) trial. Ann Surg Oncol 2007;14:922–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Wagman LD. Palliative surgical oncology. Surg Oncol Clin North Am 2004;13:XIII-XIV

    Google Scholar 

  17. Wagman LD. Progress in palliative surgery—is it a subspecialty? J Surg Oncol 2007;96:449–50

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The authors are grateful to the American Cancer Society for supporting this study through a research grant.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David D. Smith PhD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Smith, D.D., McCahill, L.E. Predicting Life Expectancy and Symptom Relief Following Surgery for Advanced Malignancy. Ann Surg Oncol 15, 3335–3341 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-008-0162-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-008-0162-1

Keywords

Navigation