Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparative Study of the Accuracy of Breast Resection in Oncoplastic Surgery and Quadrantectomy in Breast Cancer

  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The aim of this study was to determine whether oncoplastic surgery ensures accurate tumor resection and reduces the need for further surgery in comparison with standard quadrantectomies.

Methods

This was a prospective comparative study of 74 patients with breast tumor diameter ≥15 mm. The principal criterion for case selection was breast size that allowed either quadrantectomy or oncoplastic surgery to be scheduled. The following were recorded and compared between groups: the size of the glandular resection, the width of the nearest margins, the ratio of clear margins, and the need for further surgery.

Results

The patients who underwent oncoplastic surgery were younger than those who had quadrantectomy. All other demographic and oncological preoperative data were comparable. The median volume of the excised specimen in the oncoplastic group was higher than in the quadrantectomy group. The nearest lateral margin widths were larger in the oncoplastic group than in the quadrantectomy group. Free surgical margins ≥5 mm and ≥10 mm were obtained more frequently using oncoplastic surgery than standard quadrantectomy. However, the need for fewer secondary surgeries was not demonstrated in our study.

Conclusions

Oncoplastic surgery achieves more accurate tumor resection than standard quadrantectomy. This approach might be useful in extending the indications for conservative therapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Audretsch W, Rezai M, Kolotas C. Tumor-specific immediate reconstruction in breast cancer patients. Perspect Plas Surg 1998; 11:71–100

    Google Scholar 

  2. Smith ML, Evans GR, Gurlek A, Bouvet M, Singletary SE, Ames FC, et al. Reduction mammaplasty: its role in breast conservation surgery for early-stage breast cancer. Ann Plast Surg 1998; 41:234–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Shrotria S. Techniques for improving the cosmetic outcome of breast conservation surgery. Eur J Surg Oncol 2001; 27:109–12

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Berrino P, Campora E, Santi P. Postquadrantectomy breast deformities: classification and techniques of surgical correction. Plast Reconstr Surg 1987; 79:567–72

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Clough KB, Thomas SS, Fitoussi AD, Couturaud B, Reyal F, Falcou MC. Reconstruction after conservative treatment for breast cancer: cosmetic sequelae classification revisited. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004; 114:1743–53

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Anderson BO, Masetti R, Silverstein MJ. Oncoplastic approaches to partial mastectomy: an overview of volume-displacement techniques. Lancet Oncol 2005; 6:145–57

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Papp C, McCraw JB. Autogenous latissimus breast reconstruction. Clin Plast Surg 1998; 25:261–6

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Galimberti V, Zurrida S, Zanini V, et al. Central small size breast cancer: how to overcome the problem of nipple and areola involvement. Eur J Cancer 1993; 29:10–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Clough KB, Nos C, Salmon RJ, Soussaline M, Durand JC. Conservative treatment of breast cancers by mammaplasty and irradiation: a new approach to lower quadrant tumors. Plast Reconstr Surg 1995; 96:363–70

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Clough KB, Lewis JS, Couturaud B, Fitoussi A, Nos C, Falcou MC. Oncoplastic techniques allow extensive resections for breast-conserving therapy of breast carcinomas. Ann Surg 2003; 237:26–34

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Shestak KC, Johnson R, Greco RJ, Williams SL. Partial mastectomy and breast reduction as a valuable treatment option for patients with macromastia and carcinoma of the breast. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1993; 177: 54–6

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Laxenaire A, Barreau-Pouhaer L, Arriagada R, Petit JY. Role of immediate reduction mammaplasty and mammapexy in the conservative treatment of breast cancers. Ann Chir Plast Esthet 1995; 40:83–9

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Nos C, Fitoussi A, Bourgeois D, Fourquet A, Salmon RJ, Clough KB. Conservative treatment of lower pole breast cancers by bilateral mammoplasty and radiotherapy. Eur J Surg Oncol 1998; 24:508–14

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Spear SL, Pelletiere CV, Wolfe AJ, Tsangaris TN, Pennanen MF. Experience with reduction mammaplasty combined with breast conservation therapy in the treatment of breast cancer. Plast Reconstr Surg 2003; 111:1102–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kohls A. Oncoplastic variations in surgical treatment of pT2 breast carcinoma. Zentralbl Chir 1998; 123:113–5

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gajdos C, Tartter PI, Bleiweiss IJ. Subareolar breast cancers. Am J Surg 2000; 180:167–70

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Chang E, Johnson N, Webber B, Booth J, Rahhal D, Gannett D, et al. Bilateral reduction mammoplasty in combination with lumpectomy for treatment of breastcancer in patients with macromastia. Am J Surg 2004; 187:647–51

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Newman LA, Kuere HM, McNeese MD, et al. Reduction mammoplasty improves breast conservation therapy in patients with macromastia. Am J Surg 2001; 181: 215–20

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kaur N, Petit JY, Rietjens M, et al. Comparative study of surgical margins in oncoplastic surgery and quadrantectomy in breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2005; 12:539–45

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Bricout N. (1992) Chirurgie du sein. Paris: Springer-Verlag

  21. Benelli L. A new periareolar mammaplasty: the “round block” technique. Aesthetic Plast Surg 1990; 14:93–100

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Veronesi U, Saccozzi R, Del Vecchio M, Banfi A, Clemente C, De Lena M, et al. Comparing radical mastectomy with quadrantectomy, axillary dissection, and radiotherapy in patients with small cancers of the breast. N Eng J Med 1981; 305: 6–11

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Rudgers EJT. Guidelines to assure quality in breast cancer surgery. Eur J SurgOncol 2005; 31:568–76

    Google Scholar 

  24. Smitt MC, Nowels KX, Zdeblick MJ, et al. The importance of the lumpectomy surgical margin status in long-term results of breast conservation. Cancer 1995; 76:259–67

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Neuschatz AC, DiPetrillo T, Steinhoff M, et al. The value of breast lumpectomy margin assessment as a predictor of residual tumor burden in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Cancer 2002; 94:1917–24

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Holland R, Hendriks JH, Vebeek AL, Mravunac M, Schuurmans Stekhoven JH. Extent, distribution, and mammographic/histological correlations of breast ductal carcinoma in situ. Lancet 1990; 335:519–22

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Kerlikowske K, Molinaro A, Cha I, et al. Characteristics associated with recurrence among women with ductal carcinoma in situ treated by lumpectomy. J Natl Cancer Inst 2003; 95:1692–702

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Vicini FA, Kestin LL, Goldstein NS, et al. Relationship between excision volume, margin status, and tumor size with the development of local recurrence in patients with ductal carcinomain-situ treated with breast-conserving therapy. J Surg Oncol 2001; 76:245–54

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Pass H, Vicini FA, Kestin LL. Changes in management techniques and patterns of disease recurrence over time in patients with breast carcinoma treated with breast conserving therapy at a single institution. Cancer 2004; 101:713–20

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Cochrane RA, Valasiadou P, Wilson ARM, Al Ghazal SK, Macmillan RD. Cosmesis and satisfaction after breast conserving surgery correlates with the percentage of breast volume excised. Brit J Surg 2003; 90:1505–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pierre-Ludovic Giacalone MD, PhD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Giacalone, PL., Roger, P., Dubon, O. et al. Comparative Study of the Accuracy of Breast Resection in Oncoplastic Surgery and Quadrantectomy in Breast Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 14, 605–614 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-006-9098-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-006-9098-5

Keywords

Navigation