Skip to main content
Log in

Analytical Characterization of an Oil-in-Water Adjuvant Emulsion

  • Research Article
  • Published:
AAPS PharmSciTech Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Adjuvants are typically used in subunit vaccine formulations to enhance immune responses elicited by individual antigens. Physical chemical characterization of novel adjuvants is an important step in ensuring their effective use in vaccine formulations. This paper reports application of a panel of quantitative assays developed to analyze and characterize an oil-in-water adjuvant emulsion, which contains glucopyranosyl lipid A (GLA) and is a squalene-based emulsion. GLA is a fully synthetic analogue of monophosphoryl lipid A, which is a Toll-like receptor type 4 agonist and an FDA-approved adjuvant. The GLA-stable emulsion (GLA-SE) is currently being used for a respiratory syncytial virus vaccine in a phase 2 clinical trial. GLA was quantitated using reverse-phased high-performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC) coupled to a mass spectrometric detector, achieving higher assay sensitivity than the charged aerosol detection routinely used. Quantitation of the excipients of GLA-SE, including squalene, egg phosphatidyl choline, and Poloxamer 188, was achieved using a simple and rapid RP-HPLC method with evaporative light scattering detection, eliminating chemical derivatization typically required for these chromophore-lacking compounds. DL-α-tocopherol, the antioxidant of the GLA-SE, was quantitated using a RP-HPLC method with conventional UV detection. The experimental results compared well with values expected for these compounds based on targeted composition of the adjuvant. The assays were applied to identify degradation of individual components in a GLA-SE sample that degraded into distinct aqueous and oil phases. The methods developed and reported here are effective tools in monitoring physicochemical integrity of the adjuvant, as well as in formulation studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bomford R. Will adjuvants be needed for vaccines of the future? Dev Biol Stand. 1998;92:13–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Coler RN et al. A synthetic adjuvant to enhance and expand immune responses to influenza vaccines. PLoS ONE. 2010;5(10):e13677.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Baldwin SL, Bertholet S, Reese VA, Ching LK, Reed SG, Coler RN. The importance of adjuvant formulation in the development of a TB vaccine. J Immunol. 2012;188(5):2189–97.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Reed SG, Orr MT, Fox CB. Key roles of adjuvants in modern vaccines. Nat Med. 2013;19:1597–608.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Vogel FR, Caillet C, Kusters IC, Haensler J. Emulsion-based adjuvants for influenza vaccines. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2009;8(4):483–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Baldwin SL, Shaverdian N, Goto Y, Duthie MS, Raman VS, et al. Enhanced humoral and type 1 cellular immune responses with fluzone adjuvanted with a synthetic TLR4 agonist formulated in an emulsion. Vaccine. 2009;27(43):5956–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Coler RN, Bertholet S, Moutaftsi M, Guderian JA, Windish HP, et al. Development and characterization of synthetic glucopyranosyl lipid a adjuvant system as a vaccine adjuvant. PLoS ONE. 2011;6(1):e16333.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Baldridge JR, Crane RT. Monophosphoryl lipid a (MPL) formulations for the next generation of vaccines. Methods. 1999;19:103–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cunningham AL. The herpes zoster subunit vaccine (shingrix). Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2015;1471–2598.

  10. Anderson RC, Fox CB, Dutill TS, Shaverdian N, Evers TL, et al. Physicochemical characterization and biological activity of synthetic TLR4 agonist formulations. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2010;75(1):123–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lambert SL et al. A novel respiratory syncytial virus F subunit vaccine adjuvanted with GLA-SE elicits robust protective Th1-type humoral and cellular immunity in rodent models. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(3):e0119509.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. A study to evaluate the safety of respiratory syncytial virus vaccine MEDI7510 in older adults. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02115815.

  13. Fox CB. Characterization of TLR4 agonist effects on alhydrogel® sedimentation: a novel application of laser scattering optical profiling. J Pharm Sci. 2012;101:4357–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Walton WH. Feret’s statistical diameter as measure of particle size. Nature. 1948;162:329–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Misquith A, Millie Fung HW. In vitro evaluation of TLR4 agonist activity: formulation effects. Colloids Surf B: Biointerfaces. 2014;113:312–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. The AOCS Lipid Library. HTML: http://lipidlibrary.aocs.org

  17. Chung HH, Zhou CF, Khor HK, Qiu J. Direct determination of residual pluronic F-68 in in-process samples from monoclonal antibody preparation by high performance liquid chromatography. J Chromatogr A. 2011;1218(15):2106–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Fox CB, Baldwin SL, Duthie MS, Reed SG, Vedvick TS. Immuno-modulatory and physical effects of phospholipid composition in vaccine adjuvant emulsions. AAPS PharmSciTec. 2012;13(2):498–506.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors like to thank the NanoImaging Services (San Diego, CA) for providing the cryo-EM data.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gautam Sanyal.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Esm 1

(DOCX 875 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sun, J., Remmele, R.L. & Sanyal, G. Analytical Characterization of an Oil-in-Water Adjuvant Emulsion. AAPS PharmSciTech 18, 1595–1604 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1208/s12249-016-0626-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1208/s12249-016-0626-8

Key words

Navigation