Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

An Investigation on the Effect of Polyethylene Oxide Concentration and Particle Size in Modulating Theophylline Release from Tablet Matrices

  • Research Article
  • Published:
AAPS PharmSciTech Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Polyethylene oxide has been researched extensively as an alternative polymer to hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC) in controlled drug delivery due to its desirable swelling properties and its availability in a number of different viscosity grades. Previous studies on HPMC have pointed out the importance of particle size on drug release, but as of yet, no studies have investigated the effect of particle size of polyethylene oxide (polyox) on drug release. The present study explored the relationship between polymer level and particle size to sustain the drug release. Tablets produced contained theophylline as their active ingredient and consisted of different polyethylene oxide particle size fractions (20–45, 45–90, 90–180 and 180–425 μm). It was shown that matrices containing smaller particle sizes of polyox produced harder tablets than when larger polyox particles were used. The release studies showed that matrices consisting of large polyox particles showed a faster release rate than matrices made from smaller particles. Molecular weight (MW) of the polymer was a key determining step in attaining sustained release, with the high MW of polyox resulting in a delayed release profile. The results showed that the effect of particle size on drug release was more detrimental when a low concentration of polyox was used. This indicates that care must be taken when low levels of polyox with different particle size fractions are used. More robust formulations could be obtained when the concentration of polyox is high. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) traces showed that particle size had no major effect on the thermal behaviour of polyox particles.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Colombo P, Bettini R, Massimo G, Catellani PL, Santi P, Peppas NA. Drug diffusion front movement is important in drug release control from swellable matrix tablets. J Pharm Sci. 1995;84:993–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Haan PD, Lerk CF. Oral controlled release dosage forms: a review. Pharm World Sci. 1984;6:57–67.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kiss D, Suvegh K, Marek T, Devenyi L, Novak C, Zelko R. Tracking the physical aging of poly(ethylene oxide). AAPS PhamSci Tech. 2006;7:118–25.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bailey FE, Koleske JV. Alkylene oxides and their polymer. New York: Marcel and Dekker; 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bailey FE, Koleske JV. Poly(ethylene oxide). New York: Academic; 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Colombo P, Bettini R, Sant IP, Peppas NA. Swellable matrices for controlled drug delivery: gel-layer behaviour, mechanisms and optimal performance. Pharm Sci Technol Today. 2000;3:198–204.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Royce AE. Directly compressible polyethylene oxide vehicle for preparing therapeutic dosage forms. 1993; US Patent 5273758.

  8. Kim CJ. Drug release from compressed hydrophilic Polyox® WSR tablets. J Pharm Sci. 1993;84:303–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chatani Y, Okamura S. Crystal structure of poly(ethylene oxide)–sodium iodide complex. Polymer. 1987;28:1815–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Rowe RC, Sheskey PJ, Weller PJ. Handbook of pharmaceutical excipients. 4th ed. London: Pharmaceutical Press; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Dimitrov M, Lambov N. Study of Verapamil hydrochloride release from compressed hydrophilic Polyox-Wsr tablets. Int J Pharm. 1999;189:105–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhang F, McGinity JW. Properties of sustained-release tablets prepared by hot-melt extrusion. Pharm Dev Technol. 1999;4:241–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Dhawan S, Sinha VR. Applications of poly(ethylene oxide) in drug delivery systems part II. Pharm Technol. 2005;9:82–96.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mitchell K, Ford JL, Armstrong DJ, Elliott PNC, Hogan JE, Rostron C. The influence of the particle size of hydroxypropylmethylcellulose K15M on its hydration and performance in matrix tablets. Int J Pharm. 1993;100:175–9.

  15. Liew CV, Chan LW, Ching AL, Heng PSW. Evaluation of sodium alginate as drug release modifier in matrix tablets. Int J Pharm. 2006;309:25–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Nokhodchi A, Rubenstein MH, Ford JH. The effect of particle size and viscosity grade on the compaction properties of hydroxypropylmethylcellulose 2208. Int J Pharm. 1995;126:189–97.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Landín M, Rowe RC, York P. Particle size effects on the dehydration of dicalcium phosphate dihydrate powders. Int J Pharm. 1994;104:271–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Akbari J, Nokhodchi A, Farid J, Adarangui M, Siahi–Shahdad MR, Saeedi M. Development and evaluation of buccoadhesive propranolol hydrochloride tablet formulations: effect of fillers. IL- Farmaco. 2003;59:155–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Boyapally H, Nukala RK, Bhujbal P, Douroumis D. Controlled release from directly compressible theophylline buccal tablets. Colloids Surf B: Biointerfaces. 2010;77:227–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Sabnis S, Adeyeye SM. Controlled-release hydrophilic tablets for individualized theophylline therapy. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 1998;25:187–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kaialy W, Martin GP, Ticehurst MD, Royall P, Mohammad MA, Murphy J, et al. Characterisation and deposition studies of recrystallised lactose from binary mixtures of ethanol/butanol for improved drug delivery from dry powder inhalers. AAPS J. 2011;13:30–43.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. USP Pharmacopoeia 26 National Formulary 21, USP Convention, Rockville, 2003.

  23. Khan KA. Concept of dissolution efficiency. J Pharm Sci. 1975;271:48–9.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Moore JW, Flanner HH. Mathematical comparison of dissolution profiles. Pharm Tech. 1996;20:64–74.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Al-Khattawi A, Iyire A, Dennison T, Dahmash E, Bailey CJ, Smith J, et al. Systematic screening of compressed ODT excipients: cellulosic versus non-cellulosic. Curr Drug Deliv. 2014;11(4):486–500.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Chattoraj S, Shia L, Sun CC. Understanding the relationship between crystal structure, plasticity and compaction behaviour of theophylline, methyl gallate, and their 1:1 co-crystal. Cryst Eng Comm. 2010;12:2466–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Cahyadi C, Chan LW, Colombo P, Heng PWS. The butterfly effect: a physical phenomenon of hypromellose matrices during dissolution and the factors affecting its occurrence. Int J Pharm. 2011;406:31–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Aldrete ME, Villafuerte-Robles L. Influence of the viscosity grade and the particle size of HPMC on metronidazole release from matrix tablets. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 1997;43:173–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Heng PWS, Chan LW, Easterbrook MG, Li XM. Investigation of the influence of mean HPMC particle size and number of polymer particles on the release of aspirin from swellable hydrophilic matrix tablets. J Control Rel. 2001;76:39–49.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Wu N, Wang LS, Tan DC, Moochhala SM, Yang YY. Mathematical modelling and in vitro study of controlled drug release via a highly swellable and dissoluble polymer matrix: polyethylene oxide with high molecular weights. J Control Rel. 2005;102:569–81.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Apicella A, Cappello B, Del Nobile MA, La Rotonda MI, Mensitieri G, Nicolais L. Poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) and different molecular weight PEO blends monolithic devices for drug release. Biomaterials. 1993;14:83–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Di Colo G, Burgalassi S, Chetoni P, Fiaschi MP, Zambito Y, Saettone MF. Relevance of polymer molecular weight to the in vitro/in vivo performances of ocular inserts based on poly(ethylene oxide). Int J Pharm. 2001;220:169–77.

  33. Wan LSC, Heng PWS, Wong LF. Relationship between swelling and drug release in a hydrophilic matrix. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 1993;19:1201–121.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Hiremath PS, Saha RN. Controlled release hydrophilic matrix tablet formulations of isoniazid: design and in vitro studies. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2008;9:1171–8.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Maggi L, Segale L, Torre ML, Ochoa ME, Conte U. Dissolution behaviour of hydrophilic matrix tablets containing two different polyethylene oxides (PEOs) for the controlled release of a water-soluble drug. Dimensionality study. Biomaterials. 2002;23:1113–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Lotfipour F, Nokhodchi A, Saeedi M, Norouzi-Sani S, Sharbafi J, Siahi-Shadbad MR. The effect of hydrophilic and lipophilic polymers and fillers on the release rate of atenolol from HPMC matrices. IL Farmaco. 2004;59:819–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Alderman DA. A review of cellulose ethers in hydrophilic matrixes for oral controlled-release dosage forms. Int J Pharm Tech Prod Mfr. 1984;5:1–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Ford JL, Rubinstein MH, Hogan JE. Formulation of sustained-release promethazine hydrochloride tablets using hydroxypropyl methyl cellulose matrixes. Int J Pharm. 1985;24:327–38.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Asare-Addo K, Levina M, Rajabi-Siahboomi AR, Nokhodchi A. Effect of ionic strength and pH of dissolution media on theophylline release from hypromellose matrix tablets—Apparatus USP III, simulated fasted and fed conditions. Carbohydr Polym. 2011;86:85–93.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Asare-Addo K, Levina M, Rajabi-Siahboomi AR, Nokhodchi A. Study of dissolution hydrodynamic conditions versus drug release from hypromellose matrices: the influence of agitation sequence. Colloids Surf B: Biointerfaces. 2010;81:452–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Asare-Addo K, Conway BR, Larhrib H, Levina M, Rajabi-Siahboomi AR, Tetteh J, et al. The effect of pH and ionic strength of dissolution media on in-vitro release of two model drugs of different solubilities from HPMC matrices. Colloids Surf B: Biointerfaces. 2013;111:384–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Velasco MV, Ford JL, Rowe P, Rajabi-Siahboomi AR. Influence of drug: hydroxypropylmethylcellulose ratio, drug and polymer particle size and compression force on the release of diclofenac sodium from HPMC tablets. J Control Rel. 1999;57:75–85.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Reynosa VCS, Yukimitu K, Nagami T, Carvalho CL, Moraes JCS, Araujo EB. Crystallization kinetics in phosphate sodium-based glass studied by DSC technique. J Physics Chem Solids. 2003;64:27–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Korsmeyer RW, Gurny R, Deolker E, Buri P, Peppas NA. Mechanisms of solute release from porous hydrophilic polymers. Int J Pharm. 1983;15:25–35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Heng PWS, Chan LW, Easterbrook MG, Li X. Investigation of the influence of mean HPMC particle size and number of polymer particles on the release of aspirin from swellable hydrophilic matrix tablets. J Controlled Release. 2001;76:39–49.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Medway School of Pharmacy, Universities of Kent and Greenwich, Chatham, ME4 4 TB, UK

    Saeed Shojaee, Parastou Emami, Ahmad Mahmood, Yemisi Rowaiye, Alusine Dukulay & Iain Cumming

  2. School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Science and Engineering, University of Wolverhampton, Wolverhampton, WV1 1LY, UK

    Waseem Kaialy

  3. School of Life Sciences, University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton, BN1 9QG, UK

    Ali Nokhodchi

  4. Drug Applied Research Center and Faculty of Pharmacy, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran

    Ali Nokhodchi

Authors
  1. Saeed Shojaee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Parastou Emami
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ahmad Mahmood
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yemisi Rowaiye
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Alusine Dukulay
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Waseem Kaialy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Iain Cumming
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Ali Nokhodchi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ali Nokhodchi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shojaee, S., Emami, P., Mahmood, A. et al. An Investigation on the Effect of Polyethylene Oxide Concentration and Particle Size in Modulating Theophylline Release from Tablet Matrices. AAPS PharmSciTech 16, 1281–1289 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1208/s12249-015-0295-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1208/s12249-015-0295-z

KEY WORDS

Search

Navigation