Abstract
The aim of this study is to develop meloxicam (MX)-loaded cationic transfersomes as skin delivery carriers and to investigate the influence of formulation factors such as cholesterol and cationic surfactants on the physicochemical properties of transfersomes (i.e., particle size, size distribution, droplet surface charge and morphology), entrapment efficiency, stability of formulations and in vitro skin permeation of MX. The transfersomes displayed a spherical structure. Their size, charge, and entrapment efficiency depended on the composition of cholesterol and cationic surfactants in the formulation. Transfersomes provided greater MX skin permeation than conventional liposomes and MX suspensions. The penetration-enhancing mechanism of skin permeation by the vesicles prepared in this study may be due to the vesicle adsorption to and/or fusion with the stratum corneum. Our results suggest that cationic transfersomes may be promising dermal delivery carriers of MX.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Pérez-Cullell N, Coderch L, Maza A, Parra JL, Estelrich J. Influence of the fluidity of liposome compositions on percutaneous absorption. Drug deliv. 2000;7:7–13.
Verma DD, Verma S, Blume G, Fahr A. Liposomes increase skin penetration of entrapped and non-entrapped hydrophilic substances into human skin: a skin penetration and confocal laser scanning microscopy study. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2003;55:271–7.
Montenegro L, Panico AM, Ventimiglia A, Bonina FP. In vitro retinoic acid release and skin permeation from different liposome formulations. Int J Pharm. 1996;133:89–96.
Sinico C, Manconi M, Peppi M, Lai F, Valenti D, Fadda AM. Liposomes as carriers for dermal delivery of tretinoin: in vitro evaluation of drug permeation and vesicle–skin interaction. J Control Release. 2005;103:123–36.
Touitou E, Dayan N, Bergelson L, Godin B, Eliaz M. Ethosomes—novel vesicular carriers for enhanced delivery: characterization and skin penetration properties. J Control Release. 2000;65:403–18.
Cevc G, Blume G. Lipid vesicles penetrate into intact skin owing to the transdermal osmotic gradients and hydration force. Biochim Biophy Acta. 1992;1104(1):226–32.
Elsayed MMA, Abdallah OY, Naggar VF, Khalafallah NM. Deformable liposomes and ethosomes: mechanism of enhanced skin delivery. Int J Pharm. 2006;322:60–6.
El Maghraby GM, Williams AC, Barry BW. Skin delivery of oestradiol from deformable and traditional liposomes: mechanistic studies. J Pharm Pharmacol. 1999;51:1123–34.
El Maghraby GM, Williams AC, Barry BW. Oestradiol skin delivery from ultradeformable liposomes: refinement of surfactant concentration. Int J Pharm. 2000;196:63–74.
W-s Z, X-q F, L-l W, Y-j Z. Preparation and quality assessment of itraconazole transfersomes. Int J Pharm. 2012;436(1–2):291–8.
Song Y-K, Kim C-K. Topical delivery of low-molecular-weight heparin with surface-charged flexible liposomes. Biomaterials. 2006;27:271–80.
Mohammed AR, Weston N, Coombes AGA, Fitzgerald M, Perrie Y. Liposome formulation of poorly water soluble drugs: optimisation of drug loading and ESEM analysis of stability. Int J Pharm. 2004;285:23–34.
Katahira N, Murakami T, Kugai S, Yata N, Takano M. Enhancement of topical delivery of a lipophilic drug from charged multilamellar liposomes. J Drug Target. 1999;6(6):405–14.
Manosroi A, Khanrin P, Lohcharoenkal W, Werner RG, Götz F, Manosro W, et al. Transdermal absorption enhancement through rat skin of gallidermin loaded in niosomes. Int J Pharm. 2010;392:304–10.
Gillet A, Compère P, Lecomte F, Hubert P, Ducat E, Evrard B, et al. Liposome surface charge influence on skin penetration behaviour. Int J Pharm. 2011;411:223–31.
Young-Chang A, Jin-Kyu C, Yang-Kyu C, Han-Moi K, Joon-Ho B. A novel transdermal patch incorporating meloxicam: in vitro and in vivo characterization. Int J Pharm. 2010;385:12–9.
Gupta SK, Bansal P, Bhardwaj RK, Jaiswai J, Velpandian T. Comparison of analgesic and anti-inflammatory activity of meloxicam gel with dichlofenac and piroxicam gel in animal models: pharmacokinetic parameters after topical application. Skin Pharmacol Appl Skin Phys. 2002;15:105–11.
Jantharaprapap R, Stagni G. Effects of penetration enhancers on in vitro permeability of meloxicam gels. Int J Pharm. 2007;343:26–33.
Ngawhirunpat T, Panomsuk S, Opanasopit P, Rojanarata T, Hatanaka T. Comparison of the percutaneous absorption of hydrophilic and lipophilic compounds in shed snake skin and human skin. Pharmazie. 2006;61:331–6.
Tavano L, Muzzalupo R, Cassano R, Trombino S, Ferrarelli T, Picci N. New sucrose cocoate based vesicles: preparation characterization and skin permeation studies. Colloid Surface B. 2010;75:319–22.
Fang Y-P, Tsai Y-H, Wu P-C, Huang Y-B. Comparison of 5-aminolevulinic acid-encapsulated liposome versus ethosome for skin delivery for photodynamic therapy. Int J Pharm. 2008;356:144–52.
Duangjit S, Opanasopit P, Rojanarata T, Ngawhirunpat T. Characterization and in vitro skin permeation of meloxicam-loaded liposomes versus transfersome. J Drug Deliv. 2010. doi:10.1155/2011/418316.
Smith EW, Maibach HI. Percutaceous penetration enhancement. 2nd ed. Boca Raton: Taylor and Francis; 2006.
El Maghraby GM, Barry BW, Williams AC. Liposomes and skin: from drug delivery to model membranes. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2008;34:203–22.
Obata Y, Utsumi S, Watanabe H, Suda M, Tokudome Y, Otsuka M, et al. Infrared spectroscopic study of lipid interaction in stratum corneum treated with transdermal absorption enhancers. Int J Pharm. 2010;389:18–23.
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to thank the Silpakorn University Research and Development Institute, Graduate School of Silpakorn University and the Thailand Research Funds through the Golden Jubilee Ph.D. Program (Grant No. PHD/0141/2550) for financial support.
Declaration of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Duangjit, S., Opanasopit, P., Rojanarata, T. et al. Evaluation of Meloxicam-Loaded Cationic Transfersomes as Transdermal Drug Delivery Carriers. AAPS PharmSciTech 14, 133–140 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1208/s12249-012-9904-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1208/s12249-012-9904-2