Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Using Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic (PBPK) Modeling to Evaluate the Impact of Pharmaceutical Excipients on Oral Drug Absorption: Sensitivity Analyses

  • Research Article
  • Theme: Effects of Pharmaceutical Excipients on the Function of Transporters and Cytochrome P450 in Gastrointestinal Tract and Or
  • Published:
The AAPS Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Drug solubility, effective permeability, and intestinal metabolism and transport are parameters that govern intestinal bioavailability and oral absorption. However, excipients may affect the systemic bioavailability of a drug by altering these parameters. Thus, parameter sensitivity analyses using physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models were performed to examine the potential impact of excipients on oral drug absorption of different Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS) class drugs. The simulation results showed that changes in solubility had minimal impact on Cmax and AUC0-t of investigated BCS class 1 and 3 drugs. Changes in passive permeability altered Cmax more than AUC0-t for BCS class 1 drugs but were variable and drug-specific across different BCS class 2 and 3 drugs. Depending on the drug compounds for BCS class 1 and 2 drugs, changes in intestinal metabolic activity altered Cmax and AUC0-t. Reducing or increasing influx and efflux transporter activity might likely affect Cmax and AUC0-t of BCS class 2 and 3 drugs, but the magnitude may be drug dependent. Changes in passive permeability and/or transporter activity for BCS class 2 and 3 drugs might also have a significant impact on fraction absorbed and systemic bioavailability while changes in intestinal metabolic activity may have an impact on gut and systemic bioavailability. Overall, we demonstrate that PBPK modeling can be used routinely to examine sensitivity of bioavailability based on physiochemical and physiological factors and subsequently assess whether biowaiver requirements need consideration of excipient effects for immediate release oral solid dosage forms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pond SM, Tozer TN. First-pass elimination. Basic concepts and clinical consequences. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1984;9(1):1–25. doi:10.2165/00003088-198409010-00001.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Benet LZ. The role of BCS (biopharmaceutics classification system) and BDDCS (biopharmaceutics drug disposition classification system) in drug development. J Pharm Sci. 2013;102(1):34–42. doi:10.1002/jps.23359.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research. Guidance for industry: waiver of in vivo bioavailability and bioequivalence studies for immediate-release solid oral dosage forms based on a biopharmaceutics classification system. http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/ucm070246.pdf. 2015.

  4. Chen ML, Sadrieh N, Yu L. Impact of osmotically active excipients on bioavailability and bioequivalence of BCS class III drugs. AAPS J. 2013;15(4):1043–50. doi:10.1208/s12248-013-9509-z.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Shono Y, Nishihara H, Matsuda Y, Furukawa S, Okada N, Fujita T, et al. Modulation of intestinal P-glycoprotein function by cremophor EL and other surfactants by an in vitro diffusion chamber method using the isolated rat intestinal membranes. J Pharm Sci. 2004;93(4):877–85. doi:10.1002/jps.20017.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Johnson BM, Charman WN, Porter CJ. An in vitro examination of the impact of polyethylene glycol 400, Pluronic P85, and vitamin E d-alpha-tocopheryl polyethylene glycol 1000 succinate on P-glycoprotein efflux and enterocyte-based metabolism in excised rat intestine. AAPS PharmSci. 2002;4(4), E40. doi:10.1208/ps040440.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Rege BD, Kao JP, Polli JE. Effects of nonionic surfactants on membrane transporters in Caco-2 cell monolayers. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2002;16(4–5):237–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hanke U, May K, Rozehnal V, Nagel S, Siegmund W, Weitschies W. Commonly used nonionic surfactants interact differently with the human efflux transporters ABCB1 (p-glycoprotein) and ABCC2 (MRP2). Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2010;76(2):260–8. doi:10.1016/j.ejpb.2010.06.008.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Nozawa T, Toyobuku H, Kobayashi D, Kuruma K, Tsuji A, Tamai I. Enhanced intestinal absorption of drugs by activation of peptide transporter PEPT1 using proton-releasing polymer. J Pharm Sci. 2003;92(11):2208–16. doi:10.1002/jps.10491.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Takizawa Y, Kishimoto H, Nakagawa M, Sakamoto N, Tobe Y, Furuya T, et al. Effects of pharmaceutical excipients on membrane permeability in rat small intestine. Int J Pharm. 2013;453(2):363–70. doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2013.05.055.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Tayrouz Y, Ding R, Burhenne J, Riedel KD, Weiss J, Hoppe-Tichy T, et al. Pharmacokinetic and pharmaceutic interaction between digoxin and Cremophor RH40. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2003;73(5):397–405.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hetal PT, Jagruti LD. Influence of excipients on drug absorption via modulation of intestinal transporters activity. Asian J Pharm. 2015;9(2):69–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Martin-Facklam M, Burhenne J, Ding R, Fricker R, Mikus G, Walter-Sack I, et al. Dose-dependent increase of saquinavir bioavailability by the pharmaceutic aid cremophor EL. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2002;53(6):576–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Wang HJ, Hsiong CH, Ho ST, Lin MJ, Shih TY, Huang PW, et al. Commonly used excipients modulate UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 2b7 activity to improve nalbuphine oral bioavailability in humans. Pharm Res. 2014;31(7):1676–88. doi:10.1007/s11095-013-1272-4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bogman K, Zysset Y, Degen L, Hopfgartner G, Gutmann H, Alsenz J, et al. P-glycoprotein and surfactants: effect on intestinal talinolol absorption. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2005;77(1):24–32. doi:10.1016/j.clpt.2004.09.001.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bischoff KB, Dedrick RL. Thiopental pharmacokinetics. J Pharm Sci. 1968;57(8):1346–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Fan J, Chen S, Chow EC, Pang KS. PBPK modeling of intestinal and liver enzymes and transporters in drug absorption and sequential metabolism. Curr Drug Metab. 2010;11(9):743–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Pang KS. Safety testing of metabolites: expectations and outcomes. Chem Biol Interact. 2009;179(1):45–59. doi:10.1016/j.cbi.2008.09.013.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Sun H, Pang KS. Disparity in intestine disposition between formed and preformed metabolites and implications: a theoretical study. Drug Metab Dispos. 2009;37(1):187–202. doi:10.1124/dmd.108.022483.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Jiang W, Kim S, Zhang X, Lionberger RA, Davit BM, Conner DP, et al. The role of predictive biopharmaceutical modeling and simulation in drug development and regulatory evaluation. Int J Pharm. 2011;418(2):151–60. doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2011.07.024.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhang X, Lionberger RA. Modeling and simulation of biopharmaceutical performance. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2014;95(5):480–2. doi:10.1038/clpt.2014.40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhang X, Lionberger RA, Davit BM, Yu LX. Utility of physiologically based absorption modeling in implementing Quality by Design in drug development. AAPS J. 2011;13(1):59–71. doi:10.1208/s12248-010-9250-9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Darwich AS, Neuhoff S, Jamei M, Rostami-Hodjegan A. Interplay of metabolism and transport in determining oral drug absorption and gut wall metabolism: a simulation assessment using the "Advanced Dissolution, Absorption, Metabolism (ADAM)" model. Curr Drug Metab. 2010;11(9):716–29.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Yu LX, Amidon GL. A compartmental absorption and transit model for estimating oral drug absorption. Int J Pharm. 1999;186(2):119–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Lymperopoulos A, McCrink KA, Brill A. Impact of CYP2D6 Genetic Variation on the Response of the Cardiovascular Patient to Carvedilol and Metoprolol. Curr Drug Metab. 2015;17(1):30–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Wandel C, Bocker R, Bohrer H, Browne A, Rugheimer E, Martin E. Midazolam is metabolized by at least three different cytochrome P450 enzymes. Br J Anaesth. 1994;73(5):658–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. de Lannoy IA, Silverman M. The MDR1 gene product, P-glycoprotein, mediates the transport of the cardiac glycoside, digoxin. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1992;189(1):551–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Fang J, Bourin M, Baker GB. Metabolism of risperidone to 9-hydroxyrisperidone by human cytochromes P450 2D6 and 3A4. Naunyn Schmiedeberg’s Arch Pharmacol. 1999;359(2):147–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Sousa M, Pozniak A, Boffito M. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of drug interactions involving rifampicin, rifabutin and antimalarial drugs. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2008;62(5):872–8. doi:10.1093/jac/dkn330.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Zhang W, Yu BN, He YJ, Fan L, Li Q, Liu ZQ, et al. Role of BCRP 421C>A polymorphism on rosuvastatin pharmacokinetics in healthy Chinese males. Clin Chim Acta. 2006;373(1–2):99–103. doi:10.1016/j.cca.2006.05.010.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Shirasaka Y, Kuraoka E, Spahn-Langguth H, Nakanishi T, Langguth P, Tamai I. Species difference in the effect of grapefruit juice on intestinal absorption of talinolol between human and rat. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2010;332(1):181–9. doi:10.1124/jpet.109.159756.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Wenzel U, Gebert I, Weintraut H, Weber WM, Clauss W, Daniel H. Transport characteristics of differently charged cephalosporin antibiotics in oocytes expressing the cloned intestinal peptide transporter PepT1 and in human intestinal Caco-2 cells. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1996;277(2):831–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Kato R, Nishide M, Kozu C, Iwamoto A, Urashima K, Suzuki K, et al. Is cyclosporine A transport inhibited by pravastatin via multidrug resistant protein 2? Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2010;66(2):153–8. doi:10.1007/s00228-009-0740-6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Bergstrom CA, Andersson SB, Fagerberg JH, Ragnarsson G, Lindahl A. Is the full potential of the biopharmaceutics classification system reached? Eur J Pharm Sci. 2014;57:224–31. doi:10.1016/j.ejps.2013.09.010.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Kamble PR, Shaikh KS, Chaudhari PD. Application of liquisolid technology for enhancing solubility and dissolution of rosuvastatin. Adv Pharm Bull. 2014;4(2):197–204. doi:10.5681/apb.2014.029.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Anderberg EK, Artursson P. Epithelial transport of drugs in cell culture. VIII: Effects of sodium dodecyl sulfate on cell membrane and tight junction permeability in human intestinal epithelial (Caco-2) cells. J Pharm Sci. 1993;82(4):392–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Amidon GL, Lennernas H, Shah VP, Crison JR. A theoretical basis for a biopharmaceutic drug classification: the correlation of in vitro drug product dissolution and in vivo bioavailability. Pharm Res. 1995;12(3):413–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Tiwari G, Tiwari R, Rai AK. Cyclodextrins in delivery systems: applications. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2010;2(2):72–9. doi:10.4103/0975-7406.67003.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Thomas VH, Bhattachar S, Hitchingham L, Zocharski P, Naath M, Surendran N, et al. The road map to oral bioavailability: an industrial perspective. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. 2006;2(4):591–608. doi:10.1517/17425255.2.4.591.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Klaassen CD, Aleksunes LM. Xenobiotic, bile acid, and cholesterol transporters: function and regulation. Pharmacol Rev. 2010;62(1):1–96. doi:10.1124/pr.109.002014.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Chow EC, Pang KS. Why we need proper PBPK models to examine intestine and liver oral drug absorption. Curr Drug Metab. 2013;14(1):57–79.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Muller F, Fromm MF. Transporter-mediated drug-drug interactions. Pharmacogenomics. 2011;12(7):1017–37. doi:10.2217/pgs.11.44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Koenen A, Kroemer HK, Grube M, Meyer zu Schwabedissen HE. Current understanding of hepatic and intestinal OATP-mediated drug-drug interactions. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol. 2011;4(6):729–42. doi:10.1586/ecp.11.58.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Yu L, Bridgers A, Polli J, Vickers A, Long S, Roy A, et al. Vitamin E-TPGS increases absorption flux of an HIV protease inhibitor by enhancing its solubility and permeability. Pharm Res. 1999;16(12):1812–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Dhanaraju MD, Kumaran KS, Baskaran T, Moorthy MS. Enhancement of bioavailability of griseofulvin by its complexation with beta-cyclodextrin. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 1998;24(6):583–7. doi:10.3109/03639049809085663.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Annex 7. Multisource (generic) pharmaceutical products: guidelines on registration requirements to establish interchangeability. 2006. WHO Technical Report Series, No. 937; pp. 347–390.

  47. Sinko PJ, Lee YH, Makhey V, Leesman GD, Sutyak JP, Yu H, et al. Biopharmaceutical approaches for developing and assessing oral peptide delivery strategies and systems: in vitro permeability and in vivo oral absorption of salmon calcitonin (sCT). Pharm Res. 1999;16(4):527–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Dodane V, Amin Khan M, Merwin JR. Effect of chitosan on epithelial permeability and structure. Int J Pharm. 1999;182(1):21–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Tompkins L, Lynch C, Haidar S, Polli J, Wang H. Effects of commonly used excipients on the expression of CYP3A4 in colon and liver cells. Pharm Res. 2010;27(8):1703–12. doi:10.1007/s11095-010-0170-2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Engel A, Oswald S, Siegmund W, Keiser M. Pharmaceutical excipients influence the function of human uptake transporting proteins. Mol Pharm. 2012;9(9):2577–81. doi:10.1021/mp3001815.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Irie M, Terada T, Katsura T, Matsuoka S, Inui K. Computational modelling of H+−coupled peptide transport via human PEPT1. J Physiol. 2005;565(Pt 2):429–39. doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2005.084582.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Dr. Peng Zou (FDA) for discussion and providing comments on this project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xinyuan Zhang.

Additional information

Guest Editor: Peng Zou

Disclaimer

The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(DOC 1513 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chow, E.C.Y., Talattof, A., Tsakalozou, E. et al. Using Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic (PBPK) Modeling to Evaluate the Impact of Pharmaceutical Excipients on Oral Drug Absorption: Sensitivity Analyses. AAPS J 18, 1500–1511 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1208/s12248-016-9964-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1208/s12248-016-9964-4

KEY WORDS

Navigation