Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Next Generation Ligand Binding Assays—Review of Emerging Technologies’ Capabilities to Enhance Throughput and Multiplexing

  • Mini-Review
  • Theme: Emerging Technologies in the BioAnalytical Space Applied to Large Molecule Determinations
  • Published:
The AAPS Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this manuscript is to provide a summary of the evaluation done by the Throughput and Multiplexing subteam on five emerging technologies: Single molecule array (Simoa™), Optimiser™, CyTOF® (Mass cytometry), SQIDLite™, and iLite™. Most of the information is presented with a minimum amount of published data and much is based on discussions with users and the vendor, to help provide the reader with an unbiased assessment of where the subteam sees each technology fitting best in the bioanalysis of large molecules. The evaluation focuses on technologies with advantages in throughput and multiplexing, but is wide enough to capture their strengths in other areas. While all platforms may be suited to support bioanalysis in the discovery space, because of their emergent nature, only Optimiser and SQIDLite are currently ready to be used in the regulated space. With the exception of Optimiser, each instrument/technology requires an up-front investment from the bioanalytical lab that will need justification during capital budget discussions. Ultimately, the platform choice should be driven by the quality of data, project needs, and the intended use of the data generated. In a time- and resource-constrained environment, it is not possible to evaluate all emergent technologies available in the market; we hope that this review gives the reader some of the information needed to decide which technology he/she may want to consider evaluating to support their drug development program in comparison to the options they already have in their hands.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rissin DM, Kan CW, Campbell TG, Howes SC, Fournier DR, Song L, et al. Single-molecule enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay detects serum proteins at subfemtomolar concentrations. Nat Biotechnol. 2010;28(6):595–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Rissin DM, Fournier DR, Piech T, Kan CW, Campbell TG, Song L, et al. Simultaneous detection of single molecules and singulated ensembles of molecules enables immunoassays with broad dynamic range. Anal Chem. 2011;83(6):2279–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Chang L, Rissin DM, Fournier DR, Piech T, Patel PP, Wilson DH, et al. Single molecule enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays: theoretical considerations. J Immunol Methods. 2012;378(1–2):102–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Rissin DM, Kan CW, Song L, Rivnak AJ, Fishburn MW, Shao Q, et al. Multiplexed single molecule immunoassays. Lab Chip. 2013;13(15):2902–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kai J, Puntambekar A, Santiago N, Lee SH, Sehy DW, Moore V, et al. A novel microfluidic microplate as the next generation assay platform for enzyme linked immunoassays (ELISA). Lab Chip. 2012;12(21):4257–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Zambito F KA, Zhang Y, DeSilva B. Development of a PK immunoassay for a therapeutic monoclonal antibody using OptimiserTM technology. AAPS National Biotechnology Conference; San Diego, CA, USA, 2013.

  7. Bendall SC, Simonds EF, Qiu P, el Amir AD, Krutzik PO, Finck R, et al. Single-cell mass cytometry of differential immune and drug responses across a human hematopoietic continuum. Science. 2011;332(6030):687–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Giesen C, Wang HAO, Schapiro D, Zivanovic N, Jacobs A, Hattendorf B, et al. Highly multiplexed imaging of tumor tissues with subcellular resolution by mass cytometry. Nat Methods. 2014;11(4):417–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lea P, Keystone E, Mudumba S, Kahama A, Ding SF, Hansen J, et al. Advantages of multiplex proteomics in clinical immunology: the case of rheumatoid arthritis: novel IgXPLEX: planar microarray diagnosis. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2011;41(1):20–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gupta S, Indelicato SR, Jethwa V, Kawabata T, Kelley M, Mire-Sluis AR, et al. Recommendations for the design, optimization, and qualification of cell-based assays used for the detection of neutralizing antibody responses elicited to biological therapeutics. J Immunol Methods. 2007;321(1–2):1–18.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Tovey MG, Lallemand C. Improved analytical methods for the detection and quantification of neutralizing antibodies to biopharmaceuticals. Bioanalysis. 2012;4(17):2179–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lallemand C, Meritet JF, Erickson R, Grossberg SE, Roullet E, Lyon-Caen O, et al. Quantification of neutralizing antibodies to human type I interferons using division-arrested frozen cells carrying an interferon-regulated reporter-gene. J Interferon Cytokine Res. 2008;28(6):393–404.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lallemand C, Kavrochorianou N, Steenholdt C, Bendtzen K, Ainsworth MA, Meritet JF, et al. Reporter gene assay for the quantification of the activity and neutralizing antibody response to TNFalpha antagonists. J Immunol Methods. 2011;373(1–2):229–39.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge Frank Zambito from BMS and Melissa Wojick from Biogen Idec for their user perspective on the Optimiser technology, Andreas Jeromin for his perspective on the Simoa technology, Kondala Atkuri and Robert Smith from Pfizer for their user perspective on the CyTOF technology, and Steven Piccoli for his review and comments on the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Valerie Theobald.

Additional information

Guest Editors: Johanna Mora and Binodh Desilva

The opinions presented in this manuscript reflect those of the authors and do not reflect the opinions of the companies represented here.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mora, J., Chunyk, A.G., Dysinger, M. et al. Next Generation Ligand Binding Assays—Review of Emerging Technologies’ Capabilities to Enhance Throughput and Multiplexing. AAPS J 16, 1175–1184 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1208/s12248-014-9660-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1208/s12248-014-9660-1

KEY WORDS

Navigation