Date: 08 Jan 2010
Determination of End Point of Primary Drying in Freeze-Drying Process Control
Freeze-drying is a relatively expensive process requiring long processing time, and hence one of the key objectives during freeze-drying process development is to minimize the primary drying time, which is the longest of the three steps in freeze-drying. However, increasing the shelf temperature into secondary drying before all of the ice is removed from the product will likely cause collapse or eutectic melt. Thus, from product quality as well as process economics standpoint, it is very critical to detect the end of primary drying. Experiments were conducted with 5% mannitol and 5% sucrose as model systems. The apparent end point of primary drying was determined by comparative pressure measurement (i.e., Pirani vs. MKS Baratron), dew point, Lyotrack (gas plasma spectroscopy), water concentration from tunable diode laser absorption spectroscopy, condenser pressure, pressure rise test (manometric temperature measurement or variations of this method), and product thermocouples. Vials were pulled out from the drying chamber using a sample thief during late primary and early secondary drying to determine percent residual moisture either gravimetrically or by Karl Fischer, and the cake structure was determined visually for melt-back, collapse, and retention of cake structure at the apparent end point of primary drying (i.e., onset, midpoint, and offset). By far, the Pirani is the best choice of the methods tested for evaluation of the end point of primary drying. Also, it is a batch technique, which is cheap, steam sterilizable, and easy to install without requiring any modification to the existing dryer.
Pikal MJ. Freeze-drying of proteins: process, formulation, and stability. ACS Symposium Series. 1994;567:120–33. Formulation and Delivery of Proteins and Peptides.CrossRef
Adams GDJ, Irons LI. Some implications of structural collapse during freeze-drying using Erwinia caratovora l-asparaginase as a model. J Chem Biotechnol. 1993;58:71–6.CrossRef
Rambhatla S, Pikal MJ. Heat and mass transfer scale-up issues during freeze-drying, I: atypical radiation and the edge vial effect. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2003;4(2):111–20.CrossRef
Nail SL, Johnson W. Methodology for in-process determination of residual water in freeze-dried products. Dev Biol Stand. 1992;74:137–51. Biol. Prod. Freeze-Drying Formulation.PubMed
Roy ML, Pikal MJ. Process control in freeze drying: determination of the end point of sublimation drying by an electronic moisture sensor. J Parenter Sci Technol. 1989;43(2):60–6.PubMed
Mayeresse YVR, Sibille PH, Nomine C. Freeze-drying process monitoring using a cold plasma ionization device. PDA J Pharm Sci Technol. 2007;61(3).
Bardat A, Biguet J, Chatenet E, Courteille F. Moisture measurement: a new method for monitoring freeze-drying cycles. J Parenter Sci Technol. 1993;47(6):293–9.PubMed
Milton N, Pikal MJ, Roy ML, Nail SL. Evaluation of manometric temperature measurement as a method of monitoring product temperature during lyophilization. PDA J Pharm Sci Tech. 1997;51(1):7–16.
Pikal MJ, Roy ML. Unpublished observations.
Patel SM, Jameel F, Pikal MJ. Effect of dryer load on freeze-drying process design. AAPS Annual Meeting. San Antonio, Texas, USA; 2006.
Zasypkin DV, Lee T-C. Extracellular ice nucleators from pantoea ananas: effects on freezing of model foods. J Food Sci. 1999;64(3):473–8.CrossRef
- Determination of End Point of Primary Drying in Freeze-Drying Process Control
Volume 11, Issue 1 , pp 73-84
- Cover Date
- Online ISSN
- Springer US
- Additional Links
- end point
- primary drying
- residual water
- Industry Sectors