Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Pharmacogenomics: The promise of personalized medicine

  • Published:
AAPS PharmSci Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Pharmacogenetics and pharmacogenomics deal with the genetic basis underlying variable drug response in individual patients. The traditional pharmacogenetic approach relies on studying sequence variations in candidate genes suspected of affecting drug response. On the other hand, pharmacogenomic studies encompass the sum of all genes, i.e., the genome. Numerous genes may play a role in drug response and toxicity, introducing a daunting level of complexity into the search for candidate genes. The high speed and specificity associated with newly emerging genomic technologies enable the search for relevant genes and their variants to include the entire genome. These new technologies have essentially spawned a new discipline, termed pharmacogenomics, which seeks to identify the variant genes affecting the response to drugs in individual patients. Moreover, pharmacogenomic analysis can identify disease susceptibility genes representing potential new drug targets. All of this will lead to novel approaches in drug discovery, an individualized application of drug therapy, and new insights into disease prevention. Current concepts in drug therapy often attempt treatment of large patient populations as groups, irrespective of the potential for individual, genetically-based differences in drug response. In contrast, pharmacogenomics may help focus effective therapy on smaller patient subpopulations which although demonstrating the same disease phenotype are characterized by distinct genetic profiles. Whether and to what extent this individual, genetics-based approach to medicine results in improved, economically feasible therapy remain to be seen.

To exploit these opportunities in genetic medicine, novel technologies will be needed, legal and ethical questions must be clarified, health care professionals must be educated, and the public must be informed about the implications of genetic testing in drug therapy and disease management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lazarou J, Pomeranz BH, Corey PN. Incidence of adverse drug reactions in hospitalized patients. JAMA. 1998;279:1200–1205.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Sadee W. Finding the right drug for the right patient. Pharm Res. 1998;15:959–963.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Maynard Smith J. The Theory of Evolution. Baltimore, Maryland: Penguin Books; 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Garrod AE. The incidence of alcaptonuria: a study in chemical individuality. Lancet. 1902;ii:1616–1620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Snyder LH. Studies in human inheritance. Ohio J Sci. 1932;32:436–468.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ford EB. Genetic Polymorphism. London: Faber & Faber; 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Nebert DW. Pharmacogenetics: 65 candles on the cake. Pharmacogenetics. 1997;7:435–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kalow W. Pharmacogenetics: heredity and the response to drugs. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders; 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Carsen PE, Flanagan CL, Iokes CE, Alving AS. Enzymatic deficiency in primaquine-sensitive erythrocytes. Science. 1956;124,484–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hughes HB, Biehl JP, Jones AP, Schmidt LH. Metabolism of isoniazid in man as related to the occurrence of peripheral neuritis. Am Rev Tuberculosis. 1954;70:266–273.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Evans DAP, Manley KA, McKusick VA. Genetic control of isoniazid metabolism in man. Br Med J. 1960;2:485–490.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Vatsis K, Martell KJ, Weber WW. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991;88:6333.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Motulsky AG. Drug reactions, enzymes and biochemical genetics. JAMA. 1957;165:835–837.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Eichelbaum M, Steincke B, Dengler JJ. Defective N-oxidation of sparteine in man: a new pharmacogenetic defect. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1977;16:183–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Weinshilboum RM, Sladek SL. Mercaptopurine pharmacogenetics: monogenic inheritance of erythrocyte thiopurine methyltransferase activity. Am J Hum Genet. 1980;32:651–62.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Tai H, Krynetski EY, Yates CR, et al. Thiopurine S-methyltransferase deficiency: two nucleotide transitions define the most prevalent mutant allele associated with loss of catalytic activity in Caucasians. Am J Hum Genet. 1996;58:694–702.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Goldenberg MM. Transtuzumab, a recombinant DNA derived humanized monoclonal antibody, a novel agent for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer. Clin Therapeut. 1999;21:309–318.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Baselge J, Norton L, Albanell J, Kim YM, Mendelsohn J. Recombinant humanized anti-HER2 antibody (HERCEPTIN) enhances the antitumor activity of paclitaxel and doxorubicin against HER2/neu overexpressing human breast cancer xeno-grafts. Cancer Res. 1998;58:2825–2831.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Touw DJ. Clinical implications of genetic polymorphisms and drug interactions mediated by cytochrome P450 enzymes. Drug Metab Drug Interact. 1997;14:55–82.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Evans DAP. Genetic factors in drug therapy. In: Clinical and Molecular Pharmacogenetics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Buchert E, Woosley RL. Clinical implications of variable antiarrythmic drug metabolism. Pharmacogenet. 1992;2:2–11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Dahl AK, Bertilsson, L. Genetically variable metabolism of antidepressants and neuroleptic drugs in man. Pharmacogenet. 1993;3:61–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Tanaka E, Hisawa S. Clinically significant pharmacokinetic drug interactions with psychoactive drugs: antidepressents and antipsychotics and the cytochrome P450 system. J Clin Pharm Ther. 1999;24:7–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. de Morais S, Wilkinson GR, Blaisdell J, Nakamura K, Meyer UA, Goldstein JA. The major genetic defect responsible for the polymorphism of S-mephenytoin metabolism in humans. J Biol Chem 1994;269:15419–15422.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Daly AK. Molecular basis of polymorphic drug metabolism. J Mol Med. 1995;73:39–553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Gonzales FJ. Pharmacogenetic phenytyping and genotyping. Present status and future potential. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1994;26:59–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ball SE, Scatina JA, Sisenwine SF, Fisher GL. The application of in vitro models of drug metabolism and toxicity in drug discovery and drug development. Drug Chem Toxicity. 1995;18:1–28.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Guengerich F. The Environmental Genome Project: Functional analysis of polymorphisms. Environment Health Perspect. 1998;106:365–368.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Kleyn PW, Vesell ES. Genetic variation as a guide to drug development. Science. 1998;281:1820–1821.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Sadee W. Pharmacogenomics. BMJ. 1999;319:1286.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Evans WE, Relling MV. Pharmacogenomics: translating functional genomics into rational therapeutics. Science. 1999;286:487–491.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Iyer VR, Eisen MB, Ross DT, et al. The transcriptional program in the response of human fibroblasts to serum. Science. 1999;283,83–87.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Schachter B. Pharming the Genome. Biomednet [serial online]. October 30, 1998;41.

  34. Fluri KG, Fitzpatrick G, Chiem N, Harrison DJ. Integrated capillary electrophoresis devices with an efficient postcolumn reactor in planar quartz and glass chips. Anal Chem. 1996;68:4285–4290.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Jacobson SC, Ramsey SC. Integrated microdevice for DNA restriction fragment analysis. Anal Chem. 1996;68:720–723.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Blanchard AP, Friend SH. Cheap DNA arrays-it’s not all smoke and mirrors. Nature Biotech. 1999;17:953.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Russo E. Big pharma hedges its bets. The Scientist. 1999;13:1.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Poste G. In Bio ’98 International Meeting and Exposition 1–9. New York: RAND Corporation; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Weber WW. Pharmacogenetics. New York: Oxford University Press; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wolfgang Sadée.

Additional information

Published: March 7, 2000.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mancinelli, L., Cronin, M. & Sadée, W. Pharmacogenomics: The promise of personalized medicine. AAPS PharmSci 2, 4 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1208/ps020104

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1208/ps020104

Key Words

Navigation