Skip to main content
Log in

Socioeconomic status and perceptions of access and safety for physical activity

  • Published:
Annals of Behavioral Medicine

Abstract

Background: Environmental factors may play an important role on influencing physical activity (PA) behaviors.Purpose: Perceptions of access and safety for PA were compared among residents who were stratified as low or high in socioeconomic status (SES).Methods: Residents of a U.S. southeastern county (N = 1,194, 18–96 years of age) were contacted using a random-digit-dial method and asked about neighborhood and community environmental supports for PA. A Geographic Information System (GIS) was used to identify trails, sidewalks, public recreation facilities, and violent crime incidents.Results: A cluster analysis identified 10 census tracts as low SES and 11 census tracts as high SES (median household income, owner-occupied houses). More African Americans (66.5%) than Whites (33.5%) were classified as living in low-SES areas. Respondents from low-SES areas also reported engaging in less PA based on Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and American College of Sports Medicine recommendations than respondents from high-SES areas (p < .05). Respondents from low-SES (vs. high-SES) areas reported higher perceptions of neighborhood crime, unattended dogs, unpleasantness of neighborhoods, untrustworthy neighbors, and less access to public recreation facilities (ps < .05). GIS data for presence of sidewalks, recreation facilities, and crime did not support these differences in perceptions; however, respondents from low-SES (vs. high-SES) areas had substantially fewer trails. Having and using trails in one’s community predicted sufficient PA and walking for 150 min/week for low-SES respondents but not for high SES respondents (ps = .05, adjusted for covariates).Conclusions: Having access to trails is an important environmental feature among low-SES communities and should be the focus of future community-based PA interventions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pate R, Pratt M, Blair S, et al.: Physical activity and public health: A recommendation from the Centers for Disease Control and the American College of Sports Medicine.Journal of American Medical Association. 1995,273:402–407.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.Physical Activity and Health: A Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dunn AL, Marcus BH, Kampert JB, et al.: Comparison of lifestyle and structured interventions to increase physical activity and cardiorespiratory fitness: A randomized trial.Journal of the American Medical Association. 1999,218:327–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Jones DA, Ainsworth BE, Croft JB, et al.: Moderate leisure-time physical activity: Who is meeting the public health recommendations? A national cross-sectional study.Archives of Family Medicine. 1998,7:285–289.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. King AC, Blair SN, Bild DE, et al. Determinants of physical activity and interventions in adults.Medicine Science Sports and Exercise. 1992,24:S221-S226.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Marcus BH, King TK, Clark MM, Pinto BM, Bock BC: Theories and techniques for promoting physical activity behaviors.Sports Medicine. 1996,22:321–331.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Young DR, King AC: Exercise adherence: Determinants of physical activity and applications of health behavior change theories.Medicine Exercise Nutrition and Health. 1995,4:33.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Sallis JF, Owen N: Determinants of physical activity. InPhysical Activity and Behavioral Medicine. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1999, 110–134.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hill JO, Peters JC: Environmental contributions to the obesity epidemic.Science. 1998, May 28,280:1371–1374.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Henderson KA, Ainsworth BE: Enablers and constraints to walking for older African American and American Indian women: The Cross-Cultural Activity Participation Study.Research Quarterly Exercise and Sports. 2000,71:313–321.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Henderson KA, Neff LJ, Sharpe PA, et al.: “It takes a village” to promote physical activity: The potential for public park and recreation administration.Journal of Park and Recreation Administration. 2001,19:23–41.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wilcox S, Richter DL, Henderson KA, Greaney ML, Ainsworth BE: Perceptions of physical activity and personal barriers and enablers in African-American women.Ethnicity and Disease. 2002,12:353–362.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Richter DL, Wilcox S, Greaney ML, Henderson KA, Ainsworth BE: Environmental, policy, and cultural factors related to physical activity in African American women.Women and Health. 2002,36:91–109.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Eyler AA, Baker E, Cromer L, et al.: Physical activity and minority women: A qualitative study.Health Education and Behavior. 1998,25:640–652.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Nies MA, Vollman M, Cook T: African American women’s experiences with physical activity in their daily lives.Public Health and Nursing. 1999,16:23–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Lavizzo-Mourey R, Cox C, Strumpf N, et al.: Attitudes and beliefs about exercise among elderly African Americans in an urban community.Journal of the National Medical Association. 2001,93:475–480.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Clark DO: Identifying psychological, physiological, and environmental barriers and facilitators to exercise among older low-income adults.Journal of Clinical Geropsychology. 1999,5:51–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Carter-Nolan PL, Adams-Campbell LL, Williams J: Recruitment strategies for Black women at risk for noninsulin-dependent diabetes mellitus into exercise protocols: A qualitative assessment.Journal of the National Medical Associaiton. 1996,88:558–562.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Giles-Corti B, Donovan RJ: Socioeconomic status differences in recreational physical activity levels and real and perceived access to a supportive physical environment.Preventive Medicine. 2002,35:601–611.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Parks SE, Houseman RA, Brownson RC: Differential correlates of physical activity in urban and rural adults of various socioeconomic backgrounds in the United States.Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health. 2003,57:29–35.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Droomers M, Schrijvers C, Mheen HVD, Mackenbach J: Education differences in leisure-time physical inactivity: A descriptive and explanatory study.Social Science Medicine. 1998,47:1165–1176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Bull F, Milligan R, Rosenberg M, MacGowan H:Physical Activity Levels of Western Australian Adults 1999. Perth, Western Australia: Health Department of PA and Sport and Recreation Way2Go, Western Australia Government, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Brownson RC, Baker EA, Houseman RA, Brennan LK, Bacak SJ: Environmental and policy determinants of physical activity in the United States.American Journal of Public Health. 2001,91:1995–2003.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Brownson RC, Houseman RA, Brown DR, et al.: Promoting physical activity in rural communities.American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2000,18:235–241.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Sallis JF, Johnson MF, Calfas KJ, Caparosa S, Nichols JF: Assessing perceived physical environmental variables that may influence physical activity.Research Quarterly Exercise and Sports. 1997,68: 345–351.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Sallis JF, Melbourne H, Hofstetter CR, et al.: Distance between homes and exercise facilities related to frequency of exercise among San Diego residents.Public Health Reports. 1990,105:179–185.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Brownson RC, Chang JJ, Eyler AA, et al.: Measuring the environment for friendliness toward physical activity: A comparison of the reliability of 3 questionnaires.American Journal of Public Health. 2004,94:473–483.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kirtland KA, Porter DE, Addy CL, et al.: Environmental measures of physical activity supports: Perception versus reality.American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2003,24:323–331.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Ainsworth BE, Wilcox S, Henderson KA, et al.: Environmental supports for physical activity among southern African American women [Abstract].Medicine Science Sports and Exercise. 2002,34:S11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Wilcox S, Ainsworth BE, Henderson KA, et al.: Personal barriers to physical activity in African American women [Abstract].Medicine Science Sports and Exercise. 2002,34:S11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Research Triangle Institute:SUDAAN User’s Manual, Release 80. Research Triangle Park, NC: Author, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Gump BR, Matthews KA, Raikkonen K: Modeling relationships among socioeconomic status, hostility, cardiovascular reactivity and left ventricular mass in African American and White children.Health Psychology. 1999,18:140–150.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Allison KW, Burton L, Marshall S, et al.: Life experiences among urban adolescents: Examining the role of context.Child Development. 1999,70:1017–1029.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Kupersmidt JB, Griesler PC, DeRosier ME, et al.: Childhood aggression and peer relations in the context of family and neighborhood factors.Child Development. 1995,66:360–375.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Wandersman A, Nation M: Urban neighborhoods and mental health: Psychological contributions to understanding toxicity, resilience, and interventions.American Psychologist. 1998,53:647–656.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Aldenderfer MS, Blashfield RK:Cluster Analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Cauley J, Donfield S, Laporte R, Warhaftig N: Physical activity by socioeconomic status in two population based cohorts.Medicine Science Sports Exercise. 1991,23:343–351.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Yen I, Kaplan G: Poverty area of residence and changes in physical activity level: Evidence from Almeda County Study.American Journal of Public Health. 1998,88:1709–1712.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dawn K. Wilson Ph.D..

Additional information

This project was supported by a grant from the Cardiovascular Health Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention cooperative agreement U48/CCU409664-06 (Prevention Research Centers Program). We acknowledge Brent Hutto for providing valuable comments on the article.

About this article

Cite this article

Wilson, D.K., Kirtland, K.A., Ainsworth, B.E. et al. Socioeconomic status and perceptions of access and safety for physical activity. ann. behav. med. 28, 20–28 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324796abm2801_4

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324796abm2801_4

Keywords

Navigation