Relation of cognitive appraisal to cardiovascular reactivity, affect, and task engagement
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
The relation of primary cognitive appraisals to cardiovascular reactivity, affect, task engagement, and perceived stress was examined in 56 men (ages 18–29). Systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), heart rate, preejection period, stroke index, cardiac index, and total peripheral resistance were assessed at rest and during performance of a computerized mental arithmetic task. Extending on prior investigations, threat and challenge appraisals were assessed independently from one another and from secondary appraisals. Positive and negative affect, task engagement, and levels of perceived stress were also assessed. Results indicated that threat (R2 = .08, p = .01), challenge (R2 = .14, p = .003), and their interaction (R2 = .11, p = .006) independently predicted DBP reactivity; DBP responses were greatest among participants with a high threat/low challenge pattern of appraisal. Threat appraisals predicted greater negative affect (R2 = .32) and perceived stress (R2 = .48), whereas challenge appraisals were related to greater positive affect (R2 = .44) and task engagement (R2 = .40, ps < .0001). Greater positive affect was correlated with increased SBP and DBP reactivity, and greater levels of task engagement with increased DBP response (ps ≤ .002). Results suggest that primary cognitive appraisals are more potent predictors of affect and task engagement than cardiovascular reactivity.
This study was supported, in part, by National Institutes of Health Grant R29 AG15112 to Shari R. Waldstein.
Frijda NH:The Emotions. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, 1986.
Lazarus RS, Folkman S:Stress, Appraisal, and Coping. New York: Springer, 1984.
Houston BK: Personality characteristics, reactivity, and cardiovascular disease. In Turner JR, Sherwood A, Light K (eds),Individual Differences in Cardiovascular Response to Stress. New York: Plenum, 1992, 103–123.
Manuck SB, Kasprowicz AL, Monroe SB, Larkin KT, Kaplan JR: Psychophysiological reactivity as a dimension of individual differences. In Schneiderman N, Weiss SB, Kaufmann P (eds),Handbook of Methods and Measurements in Cardiovascular Behavioral Medicine. New York: Plenum, 1989, 365.
Peacock EJ, Wong PTP: The Stress Appraisal Measure (SAM): A multidimensional approach to cognitive appraisal.Stress Medicine. 1990,6:227–236.CrossRef
Waldstein SR, Neumann SA, Burns HO, Maier KJ: Role-played interpersonal interaction: Ecological validity and cardiovascular reactivity.Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 1998,20:302–309.PubMed
Tomaka J, Blascovich J, Kelsey RM, Leitten CL: Subjective, physiological, and behavioral effects of threat and challenge appraisal.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1993,65:248–260.CrossRef
Tomaka J, Blascovich J, Kibler J, Ernst JM: Cognitive and physiological antecedents of threat and challenge appraisal.Journalof Personality and Social Psychology. 1997,73:63–72.CrossRef
Gerin W, Bovbjerg DH, Glynn L, et al.: Comment on “Negative Emotions and Acute Cardiovascular Responses to Laboratory Challenges”.Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 1999,21:223–224.PubMed
Schwartz GE, Weinberger DA, Singer JA: Cardiovascular differentiation of happiness, sadness, anger, and fear following imagery and exercise.Psychosomatic Medicine. 1981,43:343–364.PubMed
Sinha R, Lovallo WR, Parsons OA: Cardiovascular differentiation of emotions.Psychosomatic Medicine. 1992,54:422–435.PubMed
Krantz DS, Manuck SB, Wing RR: Psychological stressors and task variables as elicitors of reactivity. In Matthews KA, Weiss SM, Detre T, et al. (eds),Handbook of Stress, Reactivity, and Cardiovascular Disease. New York: Wiley, 1986, 85–107.
Manuck SB, Morrison RL, Bellack AS, Poleferone JM: Behavioral factors in hypertension: Cardiovascular responsivity, anger, and social competence. In Chesney MA, Rosenman RH (eds),Anger and Hostility in Cardiovascular and Behavioral Disorders. Washington: Hemisphere, 1985, 149–172.
Tomaka J, Palacios-Esquivel RL: Motivational systems and stress-related cardiovascular reactivity.Motivation and Emotion. 1997,21:275–296.CrossRef
Waldstein SR, Bachen EA, Manuck SB: Active coping and cardiovascular reactivity: A multiplicity of influences.Psychosomatic Medicine. 1997,59:620–625.PubMed
Stone AA, Neale JM, Shiffman S: Daily assessments of stress and coping and their association with mood.Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 1993,15:8–16.
Peacock EJ, Wong PTP, Reker GT: Relations between appraisals and coping schemas: Support for the congruence model.Canadian Journal of Behavioral Neuroscience. 1991,25:64–80.CrossRef
Monroe SM, Kelley JM: Measurement of stress appraisal. In Cohen S, Kessler RC, Underwood-Gordon L (eds),Measuring Stress: A Guide for Health and Social Scientists. New York: Oxford University Press, 1997, 122–147.
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company:Statistical Bulletin. 1983,64:2–9.
Debski TT, Kamarck TW, Jennings JR, et al.: A computerized test battery for the assessment of cardiovascular reactivity.International Journal of Biomedical Computers. 1991,27:277–289.CrossRef
Kubicek WG, Karnegis JN, Patterson PP, Witsoe DA, Mattson RH: Development and evaluation of an impedance cardiograph system.Aerospace Medicine. 1966,37:1208–1212.PubMed
Aiken LS, West SG:Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1991.
Falkner B, Kushner H, Onesti G, Angelakos ET: Cardiovascular characteristics in adolescents who develop essential hypertension.Hypertension. 1981,3:521–527.PubMed
Suarez EC, Williams RB: The relationships between dimensions of hostility and cardiovascular reactivity as a function of task characteristics.Psychosomatic Medicine. 1990,52:558–570.PubMed
Smith TW, Christensen AJ: Cardiovascular reactivity and interpersonal relations: Psychosomatic processes in social context.Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology. 1992,11:279–301.
- Relation of cognitive appraisal to cardiovascular reactivity, affect, and task engagement
Annals of Behavioral Medicine
Volume 26, Issue 1 , pp 32-41
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Department of Psychology, University of Maryland, Baltimore County, 1000 Hill top Circle, 21250, Balti-more, MD
- 2. Division of Gerontology, Department of Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine & Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center Baltimore Veterans Affairs Medical Center, USA