A strategy for optimizing and evaluating behavioral interventions
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
Background: Although the optimization of behavioral interventions offers the potential of both public health and research benefits, currently there is no widely agreed-upon principled procedure for accomplishing this.Purpose: This article suggests a multiphase optimization strategy (MOST) for achieving the dual goals of program optimization and program evaluation in the behavioral intervention field.Methods: MOST consists of the following three phases: (a) screening, in which randomized experimentation closely guided by theory is used to assess an array of program and/or delivery components and select the components that merit further investigation; (b) refining, in which interactions among the identified set of components and their interrelationships with covariates are investigated in detail, again via randomized experiments, and optimal dosage levels and combinations of components are identified; and (c) confirming, in which the resulting optimized intervention is evaluated by means of a standard randomized intervention trial. To make the best use of available resources, MOST relies on design and analysis tools that help maximize efficiency, such as fractional factorials.Results: A slightly modified version of an actual application of MOST to develop a smoking cessation intervention is used to develop and present the ideas.Conclusions: MOST has the potential to husband program development resources while increasing our understanding of the individual program and delivery components that make up interventions. Considerations, challenges, open questions, and other potential benefits are discussed.
- Flay BR: Efficacy and effectiveness trials (and other phases of research) in the development of health promotion programs.Preventive Medicine. 1986,15:451–474. CrossRef
- Cook TD, Campbell DT:Quasi-Experimentation: Design and Analysis Issues for Field Settings. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1979.
- Shadish WR, Cook TD, Campbell DT:Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference. New York: Houghton Mifflin, 2002.
- Box GEP, Hunter WG, Hunter JS:Statistics for Experimenters: An Introduction to Design, Data Analysis, and Model Building. New York: Wiley, 1978.
- Box GEP, Draper NR:Empirical Model-Building and Response Surfaces. New York: Wiley, 1987.
- Onken LS, Blaine JD, Battjes, RJ: Behavioral therapy research: A conceptualization of a process. In Henggeler SW, Santos AB (eds),Innovative Approaches for Difficult-to-Treat Populations. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press, 1997, 477–485.
- Greenwald P, Cullen JW: The scientific approach to cancer control.CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. 1984,34:328–332.
- UK Medical Research Council:A Framework for Development and Evaluation of RCTs for Complex Interventions to Improve Health. London: Medical Research Council, 2000. Retrieved February 2, 2004, from http://www.mrc.ac.uk/mrc_cpr.pdf
- Sussman S, Dent CW, Burton D, Stacy AW, Flay BR:Developing School-Based Tobacco Use Prevention and Cessation Programs. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1995.
- Vogt WP:Dictionary of Statistics and Methodology: A Nontechnical Guide for the Social Sciences. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1993.
- Strecher VJ. Computer-tailored smoking cessation materials: A review and discussion.Patient Education and Counseling. 1999,36:107–117. CrossRef
- Myers RH, Montgomery DC:Response Surface Methodology. New York: Wiley, 1995.
- Collins LM, Murphy SA, Bierman KA: A conceptual framework for adaptive preventive interventions.Prevention Science. 2004,5:181–192. CrossRef
- West SG, Aiken LS: Toward understanding individual effects in multicomponent prevention programs: Design and analysis strategies. In Bryant KJ, Windle M, West SG (eds),The Science of Prevention: Methodological Advances from Alcohol and Substance Use Research. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 1997, 167–209. CrossRef
- Kreuter M, Strecher V, Glassman B: One size does not fit all: The case for tailoring print materials.Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 1999,21:276–283. CrossRef
- A strategy for optimizing and evaluating behavioral interventions
Annals of Behavioral Medicine
Volume 30, Issue 1 , pp 65-73
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. The Methodology Center Department of Human Development and Family Studies, The Pennsylvania State University, USA
- 3. Institute for Social Research Department of Statistics, University of Michigan, USA
- 4. Department of Statistics Department of Industrial and Operations Engineering, University of Michigan, USA
- 5. Department of Health Behavior and Health Education, University of Michigan, USA