A randomized pilot study of cognitive-behavioral therapy versus basic health education for smoking cessation among cancer patients
- Cite this article as:
- Schnoll, R.A., Rothman, R.L., Wielt, D.B. et al. ann. behav. med. (2005) 30: 1. doi:10.1207/s15324796abm3001_1
- 341 Downloads
Background: Previously, we have linked theoretically based cognitive and emotional variables to the ability of cancer patients to quit smoking.Purpose: In this study, we evaluated the impact of cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT), which addressed these theoretically derived cognitive and emotional variables linked to tobacco use in this population, for promoting smoking cessation in a sample of cancer patients and assessed longitudinal predictors of smoking cessation.Methods: Cancer patients (N=109) were randomized to either the theoretically based CBT intervention or to a general health education (GHE) condition, and all patients received nicotine replacement therapy.Results: Contrary to our expectation, no significant difference in 30-day point-prevalence abstinence between the CBT and GHE conditions was detected at either a 1-month (44.9% vs. 47.3%, respectively) or 3-month (43.2% vs. 39.2%, respectively) follow-up evaluation. Higher quit motivation and lower cons of quitting were related to smoking cessation.Conclusions: Implications for the implementation of smoking cessation behavioral treatments in the oncologic context are discussed, as are directions for future research in this area.