RE-AIM: Evidence-based standards and a web resource to improve translation of research into practice
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Background: Health services data indicate that under present conditions evidence-based medical and preventive practices are not consistently implemented in clinical practice and affect the quality of care provided to patients. Operating with similar conditions and resources, it is unlikely that evidencebased behavioral medicine (EBBM) practices will be more successfully implemented.Purpose: In this article we propose ways to help improve the implementation of EBBM practice.Methods: This article describes the RE-AIM (Reach, Efficacy/Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance) framework that is available on a free-use Web site (http://www. re-aim.org), which offers practical research translation tools, resources, and support for program planners, community leaders, and researchers. The material located at www.re-aim.org can be used to help anticipate and overcome likely barriers to dissemination and to estimate eventual public health impact.Results: Data on Web site utilization and lessons learned thus far in its implementation are presented.Conclusions: Scientists and public health leaders should devote greater attention to reporting practice-oriented issues such as generalizability, breadth of application, and pragmatic and setting or contextual issues in addition to the current focus on internal validity issues. We hope that this and similar efforts will assist EBBM interventions to have broader applications, be consistently implemented, and be sustained.
- National Heart Lung & Blood Institute:You Changed America’ Heart. Framingham Heart Study. Retrieved May 10, 2003, from http://rover. nhlbi.nih.gov/about/framing ham/fhsbro.htm.
- Glass T: Psychosocial intervention. In Berkman LF, Kawachi I (eds),Social Epidemiology. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000, 267–305.
- Institute of Medicine:Promoting Health: Intervention Strategies from Social and Behavioral Research. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 2000.
- Glasgow RE, Lichtenstein E, Marcus A: Why don’t we see more translation of health promotion research to practice? Rethinking the efficacy to effectiveness transition.American Journal of Public Health. 2003,93:1261–1267.
- Glasgow RE, Klesges LM, Dzewaltowski DA, Bull SS, Estabrooks P: The future of health behavior change research: What is needed to improve translation of research into health promotion practice?Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 2003,27:3–12. CrossRef
- Committee on Health Care in America, Institute of Medicine:Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 2001.
- McGlynn EA, Asch SM, Adams J, et al.: The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States.New England Journal of Medicine. 2003,348:2635–2645. CrossRef
- Glasgow RE, Vogt TM, Boles SM: Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: The RE-AIM framework.American Journal of Public Health. 1999,89:1323–1327. CrossRef
- Glasgow RE, Bull SS, Gillette C, Klesges LM, Dzewaltowski DA: Behavior change intervention research in health care settings: A review of recent reports, with emphasis on external validity.American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2002,23: 62–69. CrossRef
- Dzewaltowski DA, Estabrooks PA, Klesges LM, Bull SS, Glasgow RE: Behavior change intervention research in community settings: How generalizable are the results?Health Promotion International. 2004,19: 235–245. CrossRef
- Estabrooks PA, Dzewaltowski DA, Glasgow RE, Klesges LM: Reporting of validity from school health promotion studies published in 12 leading journals, 1996–2000.Journal of School Health. 2003,73:21–28. CrossRef
- Bull SS, Gillette C, Glasgow RE, Estabrooks P: Work site health promotion research: To what extent can we generalize the results and what is needed to translate research to practice?Health Education & Behavior.30:537–549.
- Oldenburg BF, Sallis JF, Ffrench ML, Owen N: Health promotion research and the diffusion and institutionalization of interventions.Health Education Research. 1999,14:121–130. CrossRef
- Solomon S, Kington R: National efforts to promote behavior-change research: Views from the Office of Behavioral and Social Sciences Research.Health Education Research. 2002,17:495–499. CrossRef
- Ory MG, Jordan PJ, Bazzarre T: The Behavior Change Consortium: Setting the stage for a new century of health behavior-change research.Health Education Research. 2002,17:500–511. CrossRef
- Green LW: Health education’s contributions to public health in the twentieth century: A glimpse through health promotion’s rear-view mirror.Annual Review of Public Health. 1999,20:67–68. CrossRef
- National Cancer Institute, Center for Advancement of Health, Robert Wood Johnson Foundation:Designing for Dissemination Conference Summary Report, December 2002. Retrieved July 20, 2002, from http://www.cancercontrol. cancer.gov/d4d/ d4d_conf_sum_report.pdf
- Moher DA, Schulz KF, Altman D: The CONSORT statement: Revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials.Journal of the American Medical Association. 2001,285:1987–1991. CrossRef
- RE-AIM: Evidence-based standards and a web resource to improve translation of research into practice
Annals of Behavioral Medicine
Volume 28, Issue 2 , pp 75-80
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. K-State Research and Extension, Community Health Institute, Umberger 101, Kansas State University, 66506, Manhattan, KS
- 2. Kaiser Permanente-Colorado, Denver, CO
- 3. University of Tennessee Health Science Center, USA