An illustrated review of some farmer participatory research techniques
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
A review of farmer participatory research is given highlighting its variety and wide range of terminologies. Two types of methodology are discussed, rapid rural appraisals (RRA) and participatoryrural appraisals (PRA). Some methods included in the PRA group generate quantitative and qualitative data suitable for statistical analysis. The need to ensure rigor in these studies is emphasized, but this is often shunned by researchers in the belief that their studies are simple and require no more than an elementary summary. Yet the multidisciplinary nature of participatory studies, the inherent data variability, and their small sample sizes render them complex in design, analysis, and interpretation. Using three “simple” sets of ranking data from PRA studies, it is shown that statistical methods must be simple to be adopted, that data are often poor in quality, and that parametric assumptions might not always hold. The complex underlying structure of many datasets demands a flexible approach to analysis and interpretation. Greater collaboration between researchers and statisticians will improve the supply of good datasets that can be used to improve statistical techniques for this type of research and ultimately generate greater confidence in the use of statistical methodologies.
- Ashby, J. (1990), Evaluating Technology With Farmers: A Handbook, Cali, Colombia: Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical.
- Best, D. J. (1993), “Extended Analysis for Ranked Data” Australian Journal of Statistics, 35, 257–262. CrossRef
- Biggs, S. (1989), “Resource Poor Farmer Participation in Research: A Synthesis of Experinces from Nine National Agricultural Research Systems,” OFCOPR Comparative Study Paper 3, International Service for National Agricultural Research, The Hague.
- Chambers, R. (1988), “Direct Matrix Ranking in Kenya and West Bengal,” RRA Notes, 1, 13–16.
- Chambers, R. (1994), “The Origins and Practice of Participatory Rural Appraisal,” World Development, 22, 953–969. CrossRef
- Chambers, R., Pacey, A., and Thrupp, L. A. (eds.) (1989), Farmer First: Farmer Innovation and Agricultural Research, London: Intermediate Technology Publications.
- Collinson, M. . (1981), “The Exploratory Survey: Content, Methods and Detailed Guidelines for Discussions With Farmers,” CIMMYT East Africa Economic Programme Farming Systems Newsletter, April–June, 1981.
- Cornwall, A., and Jewkes, R. (1995), “What is Participatory Research?,” Social Sciences in Medicine, 41, 1667–1676. CrossRef
- Duggan, B. (1994), “Rapid Rural Appraisal Training for Baseline Data Collection and Target Group Identification,” RRA Notes, 19, 79–84.
- Fielding, W. J. (1992), “Damage Assessment by Eye: Some Caribbean Observations,” Field Crops Research, 30, 183–186. CrossRef
- Fielding, W. J., and Crowder, L. V. (1995), “Sweet Potato Weevils in Jamaica: Acceptable Pests?,” Journal of Sustainable Agriculture, 5, 105–117. CrossRef
- Fielding, W. J., and Riley, J. (2000), “Scoring Methods: A Cautionary Tale From Papua New Guinea (With Comment by R. Chambers),” PLA Notes, 37, 113–117.
- Garonna, P., and Triacca, U. (1999), “Social Change: Measurement and Theory,” International Statistical Review, 67, 49–62. CrossRef
- Gill, G. J. (1993), O. K., the Data’s Louy, But It’s All We’ve Got (Being a Critique of Conventional Method), Gatekeeper Series 38, London: International Institute for Environment and Development.
- Hildebrand, P. E. (1981), “Combining Disciplines in Rapid Appraisal: The Sondeo Approach,” Agricultural Administration, 8, 423–432. CrossRef
- Inglis, A. (1991), “Harvesting Local Forestry Knowledge: A Comparison of RRA and Conventional Surveys,” RRA Notes, 12, 32–40.
- Lama Sherpa, N. G., Ojha, P.R., and Sharma, A.R. (1997), “Why Farmers Adopt or Reject Agricultural Technologies? (A Case of Improved Maize and Wheat Varieties in the Ex-Local Target Area of Pakhribas Agricultural Centre at Dhankuta District of Eastern Nepal),” PAC Technical Paper 177, Pakhribas Agricultural Centre, Pokhara, Nepal.
- Leach, M., and Kamangira, J. (1997), “Shotgun Wedding or Happy Marriage? Integrating PRA and Sample Surveys in Malawi,” PLA Notes, 28, 42–46.
- Mathema, S. B., and Galt, D. L. (1989), “Appraisal by Group Trek,” in Farmer First: Farmer Innovation and Agricultural Research, eds. R. Chambers, A. Pacey, and L. A. Thrupp. London: Intermediate Technology Publications, pp.68–73.
- Maxwell, S., and Bart, C. (1995), “Beyond Ranking: Exploring Relative Preferences in P/RRA,” PLA Notes, 22, 28–34.
- Maxwell, S., and Frankenberger, T. R. (1995), Household Food Security: Concepts, Indicators, Measurements, Washington, D.C.: UNICEF/IFAD.
- McCracken, J. A., Pretty, J. N., and Conway, G. R. (1988), An Introduction to Rapid Rural Appraisal for Agricultural Development, London: International Institute for Environment and Development.
- Moore, M. (1979), “Denounce the Gang of Statisticians. Struggle Against the Sample Line. Unite the Researching Masses Against Professional Hegemony,” Conference on Rapid Rural Appraisal, December 4–7, 1979, Institute of Development Studies, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK.
- Pa, G., and Pa, A. (1991), Farmers Participatory Research in North Onto, Ethiopia, Report of a Training Course in Rapid Rural Appraisal, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: IIED/Farm Africa.
- Peterson, W. (1993) “Development-Agency M&E,” in Monitoring and Evaluatings Agricultural Research. A Sourcebook, eds. D. Horton, P. Ballantyne, W. Peterson, B. Uribe, D. Gapasin, and K. Sheridan, Wallingford, UK: CAB International, pp. 58–64.
- Riley, J. (1998), “Strengthening Biometry and Statistics in Agricultural Research,” Study Report, Technical Centre for Agricultural and Rural Cooperation, Wageningen.
- Riley, J., and Alexander, C. (1997), “Statistical Literature for Participatory On-Farm Research,” Experimental Agriculture, 33, 73–82. CrossRef
- Schach, S. (1979), “An Alternative to the Friedman Test With Certain Optimality Properties,” Annals of Statistics, 7, 537–550. CrossRef
- Siegel, S., and Castellan, N. J. (1988), Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioural Sciences, New York: McGraw-Hill.
- Sumberg, J., and Okali, C. (1997), Farmers’ Experiments. Creating Local Knowledge. London: Lynne Reiner.
- Taplin, R. H. (1997), “The Statistical Analysis of Preference Data,” Applied Statistics, 46, 493–512.
- Theis, J., and Grady, H. M. (1991), Participatory Rapid Appraisal for Community Development: A Training Manual Based on Experiences in the Middle East and West Africa, London: International Institute for Environment and Development/Save the Children Fund.
- An illustrated review of some farmer participatory research techniques
Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics
Volume 6, Issue 1 , pp 5-18
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- Data quality
- Participatory rural appraisal
- Rapid rural appraisal