Erratum
Unfortunately, the original version of this article [1] contained an error. Figures 2 and 3 were interchanged. Figures 2 and 3 have been corrected in the original article and are also included correctly below.
Direct comparison of binding models generated by different methods. Depicted are AUC scores for TFs stored in both JASPAR (manually collected curated models) and HT-SELEX. AUC scores were generated using ROCR. If multiple binding models were available for one TF, we depict the average AUC value
Representative plots for conservation analyses. We determined the maximum phastCons (a) and phyloP (b) scores in each experimentally confirmed binding site of BCL11A (left panel) and ZBTB33 (right panel) and calculated the averages of the maximum scores
Reference
Hombach, et al. A systematic, large-scale comparison of transcription factor binding site models. BMC Genomics 2016;17:388. doi:10.1186/s12864-016-2729-8
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The online version of the original article can be found under doi:10.1186/s12864-016-2729-8.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
About this article
Cite this article
Hombach, D., Schwarz, J.M., Robinson, P.N. et al. Erratum to: A systematic, large-scale comparison of transcription factor binding site models. BMC Genomics 17, 502 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-016-2818-8
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-016-2818-8