Introduction
Many different illness severity scores are used to report the estimated risk of death (ROD) of patients in clinical research. Such variability makes mortality comparison between studies difficult. Accordingly, it would be desirable to establish a methodology to translate the value obtained from one scoring system into an estimated equivalent value for another scoring system.
Methods
We used the adult patient database of the Australian and New Zealand (ANZ) Intensive Care Society to obtain simultaneous APACHE II (APII), APACHE III (APIII) and SAPS II scores. We used linear regression analyses to create models enabling translation of one score into another. These analyses were performed for the whole cohort, after exclusion of cardiac surgery patients and after matching for similar risk of death.
Results
We obtained complete data for three illness severity scores (SAPS II, APII, and APIII) in 636,431 admissions. There was a good correlation between the APIII and APII scores (r2 = 0.76). The overall model was APIII = 3.09 × APII + 5.8. The APIII/APII coefficient (SE) was 3.09 (0.002) for the whole cohort, 3.1 (0.002) after exclusion of cardiac surgery patients and 2.98 (0.01) after exclusion of patients with an absolute difference in ROD >1% between the two scores. There was a similar correlation between the APIII and the SAPS II scores (r2 = 0.76). The overall model was APIII = 1.47 × SAPS II + 8.6. The APIII/SAPS II coefficient (SE) was 1.47 (0.001) for the whole cohort, 1.49 (0.001) after exclusion of cardiac surgery patients and 1.55 (0.006) after exclusion of patients with an absolute difference in ROD >1% between the two scores. Finally, the correlation between the APII and SAPS II scores was moderate (r2 = 0.63). The overall model was APII = 0.36 × SAPS II + 4.4. The APII/SAPS II coefficient (SE) was 0.36 (0.0003) for the whole cohort, 0.37 (0.0004) after exclusion of cardiac surgery patients and 0.39 (0.002) after exclusion of patients with an absolute difference in ROD >1%.
Conclusion
Simple and robust translational formulas can be developed to allow clinicians to compare illness severity in intensive care studies of similar patients when such illness severity is expressed with different scoring systems.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
About this article
Cite this article
Schneider, A., Lipcsey, M., Bailey, M. et al. Relationship between illness severity scores in the ICU. Crit Care 16 (Suppl 1), P406 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1186/cc11013
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/cc11013