An international evaluation of ultrasound vs. computed tomography in the diagnosis of appendicitis
- Betzalel ReichAffiliated withTufts University School of MedicineDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Email author
- , Todd ZalutAffiliated withDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Shaare Zedek Medical Center
- , Scott G WeinerAffiliated withTufts Medical Center, Department of Emergency Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine
Abdominal computed tomography scan (CT) is the preferred radiographic study for the diagnosis of appendicitis in the United States, while radiologist-operated ultrasound (US) is often used in Israel. This comparative international study evaluates the performance of CT vs. US in the evaluation of acute appendicitis.
A retrospective chart analysis was conducted at two tertiary care teaching hospitals, one in each country. Adult patients (age 18-99) with an Emergency Department (ED) working diagnosis of appendicitis between 1 January 2005 and 31 December 2006 were reviewed. Included patients had at least one imaging study, went to the OR, and had documented surgical pathology results.
Of 136 patients in the United States with the ED diagnosis of appendicitis, 79 met inclusion criteria for the CT cohort. Based on pathology, CT had a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI 95.4-100%). The negative appendectomy rate in patients with positive CT was 0%. Total median ED length of stay was 533 min [IQR (450-632)] and median time from CT order to completion was 184 min [IQR (147-228)]. Of 520 patients in Israel, 197 were included in the US cohort. Based on final pathology, US had a sensitivity of 68.4% (95% CI 61.2-74.8%). The negative appendectomy rate in patients with positive US was 5.5%. The median ED length of stay for these patients was 387 min [IQR (259-571.5)]. Of the patients, 23.4% had subsequent CT scans. Median time from US order to completion was 20 min [IQR (7-49)]. Both time values were p < 0.001 when compared with CT. We furthermore calculate that a "first pass" approach of using US first, and then performing a confirmatory CT scan in patients with negative US, would have saved an average of 88.0 minutes per patient in the United States and avoided CT in 65% of patients.
Radiologist-operated US had inferior sensitivity and positive predictive value when compared with CT, though was significantly faster to perform, and avoided radiation and contrast in a majority of patients. A "first-pass" approach using US first and then CT if US is not diagnostic may be desirable in some institutions.
- An international evaluation of ultrasound vs. computed tomography in the diagnosis of appendicitis
- Open Access
- Available under Open Access This content is freely available online to anyone, anywhere at any time.
International Journal of Emergency Medicine
- Online Date
- October 2011
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
- 4. Department of Emergency Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, West Campus, 330 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
- 2. Department of Emergency Medicine, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, 12 Bayit Street, Jerusalem, 91031, Israel
- 3. Tufts Medical Center, Department of Emergency Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Washington Street, Boston, MA, 02111, USA