Restrictions on antimicrobial use in food animal production: an international regulatory and economic survey
The administration of antimicrobial drugs to food animals at low doses for extended durations for growth promotion and disease prevention has been linked to the global health crisis of antimicrobial resistance. Internationally, multiple jurisdictions have responded by restricting antimicrobial use for these purposes, and by requiring a veterinary prescription to use these drugs in food animals. Opponents of these policies have argued that restrictions have been detrimental to food animal production where they have been adopted.
We surveyed the antimicrobial use policies of 17 political jurisdictions outside of the United States with respect to growth promotion, disease prevention, and veterinary oversight, and reviewed the available evidence regarding their production impacts, including measures of animal health. Jurisdictions were included if they were a top-five importer of a major U.S. food animal product in 2011, as differences between the policies of the U.S. and other jurisdictions may lead to trade barriers to U.S. food animal product exports. Jurisdictions were also included if information on their policies was publicly available in English. We searched the peer-reviewed and grey literatures and corresponded with jurisdictions’ U.S. embassies, regulators, and local experts.
Jurisdictions were categorized by whether they prohibit use of antimicrobials for growth promotion and/or use of antimicrobials without a veterinary prescription. Of the 17 jurisdictions surveyed, six jurisdictions have prohibited both types of use, five jurisdictions have prohibited one use but not the other use, and five jurisdictions have not prohibited either use, while information was not available for one jurisdiction. Data on the production impacts of these prohibitions were limited, although available data, especially from Denmark and Sweden, suggest that restrictions on growth promotion use can be implemented with minimal production consequences.
A majority of leading U.S. trade partners have more stringent policies regarding antibiotic use and veterinary oversight in food animal production. Available data suggest that restrictions on growth promotion may not be detrimental to production in the long run, although additional research could be useful. There is evidence that discordance between the U.S. and other jurisdictions with respect to antimicrobial use in food animals may be detrimental to U.S. access to export markets for food animal products. The available economic evidence strengthens the rationale for restricting antimicrobial use in U.S. food animals.
- Graham JP, Nachman KE: Managing waste from confined animal feeding operations in the United States: the need for sanitary reform. J Water Health 2010, 8:646–670. CrossRef
- Constance DH, Martinez F, Aboites G: The globalization of the poultry industry: Tyson Foods and Pilgrim's Pride in Mexico. Res Rural Sociol Dev 2010, 16:59–75. CrossRef
- Sapkota AR, Lefferts LY, McKenzie S, Walker P: What do we feed to food-production animals? A review of animal feed ingredients and their potential impacts on human health. Environ Health Perspect 2007, 115:663–670. CrossRef
- US Food and Drug Administration: Guidance for Industry #209: The Judicious Use of Medically Important Antimicrobial Drugs in Food-Producing Animals. 2012. Available at: http://www.fda.gov/downloads/AnimalVeterinary/GuidanceComplianceEnforcement/GuidanceforIndustry/UCM216936.pdf. Accessed: 19 August 2013.
- US Food and Drug Administration: 2009 Summary Report on Antimicrobials Sold or Distributed for Use in Food-Producing Animals. 2010. Available at: http://www.fda.gov/downloads/ForIndustry/UserFees/AnimalDrugUserFeeActADUFA/UCM231851.pdf. Accessed: 19 August 2013.
- US Food and Drug Administration: Letter to The Honorable Louise M. Slaughter. 2011. Available at: http://www.louise.house.gov/images/stories/FDA_Response_to_Rep._Slaughter.pdf. Accessed: 19 August 2013.
- World Health Organization: The Evolving Threat of Antimicrobial Resistance: Options for Action. 2012. Available at: http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2012/9789241503181_eng.pdf. Accessed: 19 August 2013.
- Levy SB, Marshall B: Antibacterial resistance worldwide: causes, challenges and responses. Nat Med 2004, 10:S122–129. CrossRef
- Marshall BM, Levy SB: Food animals and antimicrobials: impacts on human health. Clin Microbiol Rev 2011, 24:718–733. CrossRef
- Love DC, Davis MF, Bassett A, Gunther A, Nachman KE: Dose imprecision and resistance: free-choice medicated feeds in industrial food animal production in the United States. Environ Health Perspect 2011, 119:279–283. CrossRef
- Rota A, Milani C, Corro M, Drigo I, Borjesson S: Misuse of antimicrobials and selection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus pseudintermedius strains in breeding Kennels: genetic characterization of bacteria after a two-year interval. Reprod Domest Anim 2013, 48:1–6. CrossRef
- Rota A, Milani C, Drigo I, Drigo M, Corro M: Isolation of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus pseudintermedius from breeding dogs. Theriogenology 2011, 75:115–121. CrossRef
- US Department of Agriculture: Dairy 2007: Part III: Reference of Dairy Cattle Health and Management Practices in the United States, 2007. 2008. Available at: http://www.aphis.usda.gov/animal_health/nahms/dairy/downloads/dairy07/Dairy07_dr_PartIII_rev.pdf. Accessed: 19 August 2013.
- Aarestrup FM, Jensen VF, Emborg HD, Jacobsen E, Wegener HC: Changes in the use of antimicrobials and the effects on productivity of swine farms in Denmark. Am J Vet Res 2010, 71:726–733. CrossRef
- Sapkota AR, Hulet RM, Zhang GY, McDermott P, Kinney EL, Schwab KJ, Joseph SW: Lower prevalence of antibiotic-resistant enterococci on US conventional poultry farms that transitioned to organic practices. Environ Health Perspect 2011, 119:1622–1628. CrossRef
- Pew Commission on Industrial Farm Animal Production: Putting Meat on the Table: Industrial Farm Animal Production in America. 2008. Available at: http://www.ncifap.org/_images/PCIFAPFin.pdf. Accessed: 19 August 2013.
- Silbergeld EK, Graham J, Price LB: Industrial food animal production, antimicrobial resistance, and human health. Annu Rev Publ Health 2008, 29:151–169. CrossRef
- Lawrence RS: The FDA Did Not Do Enough to Restrict Antibiotics Use in Animals. 2012. Available at: http://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2012/04/the-fda-did-not-do-enough-to-restrict-antibiotics-use-in-animals/255878/. Accessed: 16 August 2013.
- Mellon M: Negotiating with Drug Companies: The Horse-Trading Behind the FDA's Voluntary Program. 2013. Available at: http://blog.ucsusa.org/negotiating-with-drug-companies-the-horse-trading-behind-the-fdasvoluntary-program. Accessed: 16 August 2013.
- Animal Health Institute: Testimony of Dr. Richard Carnevale, Vice President, Scientific, Regulatory and International Affairs. 2010. Available at: http://democrats.energycommerce.house.gov/documents/20100714/Carnevale.Testimony.07.14.2010.pdf. Accessed: 19 August 2013.
- American Veterinary Medical Association: Testimony of Christine Hoang, DVM, MPH, CPH, Assistant Director. 2010. Available at: http://democrats.energycommerce.house.gov/documents/20100714/Hoang.Testimony.07.14.2010.pdf. Accessed: 19 August 2013.
- Johnson R: Potential Trade Implications of Restrictions on Antimicrobial Use in Animal Production. 2011. Available at: http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R41047.pdf. Accessed: 19 August 2013.
- US Food and Drug Administration: Animal Drugs @ FDA. 2013. Available at: http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/animaldrugsatfda. Accessed: 19 August 2013.
- US Department of Agriculture Foreign Agriculture Service: Global Agricultural Trade System Standard Query. 2013. Available at: http://www.fas.usda.gov/gats/ExpressQuery1.aspx. Accessed: 19 August 2013.
- Johnson R: U.S.-EU Poultry Dispute on the Use of Pathogen Reduction Treatments (PRTs). Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service; 2012.
- Johnson R: The U.S.-EU Beef Hormone Dispute. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service; 2012.
- US Government Accountability Office: Antibiotic Resistance: Agencies Have Made Little Progress Addressing Antibiotic Use in Animals. 2011. Available at: http://www.gao.gov/assets/330/323090.pdf. Accessed: 19 August 2013.
- Cogliani C, Goossens H, Greko C: Restricting antimicrobial use in food animals: lessons from Europe. Microbe 2011, 6:274–279.
- Scientific Committee for Animal Nutrition: Opinion of the Scientific Committee for Animal Nutrition on possible risks for the consumer, the animal and the users (operators) from the use of Carbadox and Olaquindox as Feed Additives. 1998. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/food/fs/sc/scan/out13_en.pdf. Accessed: 16 August 2013.
- LEI Wageningen UR: Trends in Veterinary Antibiotic Use in the Netherlands, 2004–2012. 2012. Available at: http://www.wageningenur.nl/upload_mm/8/7/f/e4deb048-6a0c-401e-9620-fab655287fbc_Trends%20in%20use%202004-2012.pdf. Accessed: 21 October 2013.
- Global Agricultural Information Network: Stricter Control on Antibiotics in Animal Husbandry. 2011. Available at: http://gain.fas.usda.gov/Recent%20GAIN%20Publications/Stricter%20Control%20On%20Antibiotics%20In%20Animal%20Husbandry_Berlin_Germany_11-9-2011.pdf. Accessed: 19 August 2013.
- Bundesministerium für Gesundheit: DART: German Antimicrobial Resistance Strategy. 2008. Available at: http://www.bmg.bund.de/fileadmin/dateien/Publikationen/Gesundheit/Sonstiges/DART_-_German_Antimicrobial_Resistance_Strategy.pdf. Accessed: 19 August 2013.
- Meatingplace: German legislators pass antibiotic reduction measure. 2013. Available at: http://www.meatingplace.com/Industry/News/Details/40367. Accessed: 19 August 2013.
- Aarestrup F: Sustainable farming: Get pigs off antibiotics. Nature 2012, 486:465–466. CrossRef
- Grave K, Jensen VF, Odensvik K, Wierup M, Bangen M: Usage of veterinary therapeutic antimicrobials in Denmark, Norway and Sweden following termination of antimicrobial growth promoter use. Prev Vet Med 2006, 75:123–132. CrossRef
- Agersø Y, Aarestrup FM: Voluntary ban on cephalosporin use in Danish pig production has effectively reduced extended-spectrum cephalosporinase-producing Escherichia coli in slaughter pigs. J Antimicrob Chemother 2013, 68:569–572. CrossRef
- World Health Organization: Impacts of Antimicrobial Growth Promoter Termination in Denmark. 2002. Available at: http://www.who.int/gfn/en/Expertsreportgrowthpromoterdenmark.pdf. Accessed: 19 August 2013.
- Institute of Medicine: Antibiotic Resistance : Implications for Global Health and Novel Intervention Strategies : Workshop Summary. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2010.
- Emborg H, Ersboll AK, Heuer OE, Wegener HC: The effect of discontinuing the use of antimicrobial growth promoters on the productivity in the Danish broiler production. Prev Vet Med 2001, 50:53–70. CrossRef
- Wierup M: The Swedish experience of the 1986 year ban of antimicrobial growth promoters, with special reference to animal health, disease prevention, productivity, and usage of antimicrobials. Microb Drug Resist 2001, 7:183–190. CrossRef
- Regeringskansliet: The Swedish Model of Animal Production. 1998. Available at: http://www.keepantibioticsworking.com/new/Library/UploadedFiles/Swedish_Model_of_Animal_Production_The.pdf. Accessed.
- Global Agricultural Information Network: Korea Phases Out Antibiotic Usage in Compound Feed. 2011. Available at: http://gain.fas.usda.gov/Recent%20GAIN%20Publications/Korea%20Phases%20Out%20Antibiotic%20Usage%20in%20Compound%20Feed_Seoul_Korea%20-%20Republic%20of_7-13-2011.pdf. Accessed: 19 August 2013.
- Reuters: Russia Lifts Import Bans on U.S. Pork. 2010. Available at: http://www.reuters.com/article/2010/03/26/pork-russia-usidUSLDE62P0TN20100326. Accessed: 19 August 2013.
- Global Agricultural Information Network: Market Opportunities for Key U.S. Products in Russia. 2012. Available at: http://gain.fas.usda.gov/Recent%20GAIN%20Publications/Market%20Opportunities%20for%20Key%20U.S.%20Products%20in%20Russia_Moscow_Russian%20Federation_3-20-2012.pdf. Accessed: 19 August 2013.
- Hvistendahl M: China Takes Aim at Rampant Antibiotic Resistance. Science 2012, 336:795. CrossRef
- Kan SA, Morrison WM: U.S.-Taiwan Relationship: Overview of Policy Issues. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service; 2013.
- Johnson R, Becker GS: U.S.-Russia Meat and Poultry Trade Issues. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service; 2010.
- Barry E: Russia Announces Barriers on Imports of U.S. Meat. 2012. Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/09/world/europe/russiaannounces-barriers-on-imports-of-us-meat.html. Accessed: 19 August 2013.
- Codex Alimentarius: About Codex. 2013. Available at: http://www.codexalimentarius.org/about-codex/en/. Accessed: 16 August 2013.
- Codex Alimentarius: Code of Practice to Minimize and Contain Antimicrobial Resistance. 2005. Available at: http://www.codexalimentarius.org/standards/list-of-standards/en. Accessed: 16 August 2013.
- Silbergeld EK, Graham J, Price LB: Industrial food animal production, antimicrobial resistance, and human health. Annu Rev Public Health 2008, 29:151–169. CrossRef
- Restrictions on antimicrobial use in food animal production: an international regulatory and economic survey
- Open Access
- Available under Open Access This content is freely available online to anyone, anywhere at any time.
Globalization and Health
- Online Date
- October 2013
- Online ISSN
- BioMed Central
- Additional Links
- Drug resistance
- Food animal
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Johns Hopkins Center for a Livable Future, Johns Hopkins University, 615 North Wolfe Street, Suite W7010, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA
- 2. Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, 615 North Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA
- 3. Department of Health Policy and Management, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, 624 North Broadway, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA