Restrictions on antimicrobial use in food animal production: an international regulatory and economic survey
The administration of antimicrobial drugs to food animals at low doses for extended durations for growth promotion and disease prevention has been linked to the global health crisis of antimicrobial resistance. Internationally, multiple jurisdictions have responded by restricting antimicrobial use for these purposes, and by requiring a veterinary prescription to use these drugs in food animals. Opponents of these policies have argued that restrictions have been detrimental to food animal production where they have been adopted.
We surveyed the antimicrobial use policies of 17 political jurisdictions outside of the United States with respect to growth promotion, disease prevention, and veterinary oversight, and reviewed the available evidence regarding their production impacts, including measures of animal health. Jurisdictions were included if they were a top-five importer of a major U.S. food animal product in 2011, as differences between the policies of the U.S. and other jurisdictions may lead to trade barriers to U.S. food animal product exports. Jurisdictions were also included if information on their policies was publicly available in English. We searched the peer-reviewed and grey literatures and corresponded with jurisdictions’ U.S. embassies, regulators, and local experts.
Jurisdictions were categorized by whether they prohibit use of antimicrobials for growth promotion and/or use of antimicrobials without a veterinary prescription. Of the 17 jurisdictions surveyed, six jurisdictions have prohibited both types of use, five jurisdictions have prohibited one use but not the other use, and five jurisdictions have not prohibited either use, while information was not available for one jurisdiction. Data on the production impacts of these prohibitions were limited, although available data, especially from Denmark and Sweden, suggest that restrictions on growth promotion use can be implemented with minimal production consequences.
A majority of leading U.S. trade partners have more stringent policies regarding antibiotic use and veterinary oversight in food animal production. Available data suggest that restrictions on growth promotion may not be detrimental to production in the long run, although additional research could be useful. There is evidence that discordance between the U.S. and other jurisdictions with respect to antimicrobial use in food animals may be detrimental to U.S. access to export markets for food animal products. The available economic evidence strengthens the rationale for restricting antimicrobial use in U.S. food animals.
- Graham, JP, Nachman, KE (2010) Managing waste from confined animal feeding operations in the United States: the need for sanitary reform. J Water Health 8: pp. 646-670 CrossRef
- Constance, DH, Martinez, F, Aboites, G (2010) The globalization of the poultry industry: Tyson Foods and Pilgrim's Pride in Mexico. Res Rural Sociol Dev 16: pp. 59-75 CrossRef
- Sapkota, AR, Lefferts, LY, McKenzie, S, Walker, P (2007) What do we feed to food-production animals? A review of animal feed ingredients and their potential impacts on human health. Environ Health Perspect 115: pp. 663-670 CrossRef
- Guidance for Industry #209: The Judicious Use of Medically Important Antimicrobial Drugs in Food-Producing Animals.
- 2009 Summary Report on Antimicrobials Sold or Distributed for Use in Food-Producing Animals.
- Letter to The Honorable Louise M. Slaughter.
- The Evolving Threat of Antimicrobial Resistance: Options for Action.
- Levy, SB, Marshall, B (2004) Antibacterial resistance worldwide: causes, challenges and responses. Nat Med 10: pp. S122-129 CrossRef
- Marshall, BM, Levy, SB (2011) Food animals and antimicrobials: impacts on human health. Clin Microbiol Rev 24: pp. 718-733 CrossRef
- Love, DC, Davis, MF, Bassett, A, Gunther, A, Nachman, KE (2011) Dose imprecision and resistance: free-choice medicated feeds in industrial food animal production in the United States. Environ Health Perspect 119: pp. 279-283 CrossRef
- Rota, A, Milani, C, Corro, M, Drigo, I, Borjesson, S (2013) Misuse of antimicrobials and selection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus pseudintermedius strains in breeding Kennels: genetic characterization of bacteria after a two-year interval. Reprod Domest Anim 48: pp. 1-6 CrossRef
- Rota, A, Milani, C, Drigo, I, Drigo, M, Corro, M (2011) Isolation of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus pseudintermedius from breeding dogs. Theriogenology 75: pp. 115-121 CrossRef
- Dairy 2007: Part III: Reference of Dairy Cattle Health and Management Practices in the United States, 2007.
- Aarestrup, FM, Jensen, VF, Emborg, HD, Jacobsen, E, Wegener, HC (2010) Changes in the use of antimicrobials and the effects on productivity of swine farms in Denmark. Am J Vet Res 71: pp. 726-733 CrossRef
- Sapkota, AR, Hulet, RM, Zhang, GY, McDermott, P, Kinney, EL, Schwab, KJ, Joseph, SW (2011) Lower prevalence of antibiotic-resistant enterococci on US conventional poultry farms that transitioned to organic practices. Environ Health Perspect 119: pp. 1622-1628 CrossRef
- Putting Meat on the Table: Industrial Farm Animal Production in America.
- Silbergeld, EK, Graham, J, Price, LB (2008) Industrial food animal production, antimicrobial resistance, and human health. Annu Rev Publ Health 29: pp. 151-169 CrossRef
- Lawrence, RS (2012) The FDA Did Not Do Enough to Restrict Antibiotics Use in Animals.
- Mellon, M (2013) Negotiating with Drug Companies: The Horse-Trading Behind the FDA's Voluntary Program.
- Testimony of Dr. Richard Carnevale, Vice President, Scientific, Regulatory and International Affairs.
- Testimony of Christine Hoang, DVM, MPH, CPH, Assistant Director.
- Johnson, R (2011) Potential Trade Implications of Restrictions on Antimicrobial Use in Animal Production.
- Animal Drugs @ FDA.
- Global Agricultural Trade System Standard Query.
- Johnson, R (2012) U.S.-EU Poultry Dispute on the Use of Pathogen Reduction Treatments (PRTs). Congressional Research Service, Washington, DC
- Johnson, R (2012) The U.S.-EU Beef Hormone Dispute. Congressional Research Service, Washington, DC
- Antibiotic Resistance: Agencies Have Made Little Progress Addressing Antibiotic Use in Animals.
- Cogliani, C, Goossens, H, Greko, C (2011) Restricting antimicrobial use in food animals: lessons from Europe. Microbe 6: pp. 274-279
- Opinion of the Scientific Committee for Animal Nutrition on possible risks for the consumer, the animal and the users (operators) from the use of Carbadox and Olaquindox as Feed Additives.
- LEI Wageningen, UR (2012) Trends in Veterinary Antibiotic Use in the Netherlands, 2004–2012.
- Stricter Control on Antibiotics in Animal Husbandry.
- DART: German Antimicrobial Resistance Strategy.
- German legislators pass antibiotic reduction measure.
- Aarestrup, F (2012) Sustainable farming: Get pigs off antibiotics. Nature 486: pp. 465-466 CrossRef
- Grave, K, Jensen, VF, Odensvik, K, Wierup, M, Bangen, M (2006) Usage of veterinary therapeutic antimicrobials in Denmark, Norway and Sweden following termination of antimicrobial growth promoter use. Prev Vet Med 75: pp. 123-132 CrossRef
- Agersø, Y, Aarestrup, FM (2013) Voluntary ban on cephalosporin use in Danish pig production has effectively reduced extended-spectrum cephalosporinase-producing Escherichia coli in slaughter pigs. J Antimicrob Chemother 68: pp. 569-572 CrossRef
- Impacts of Antimicrobial Growth Promoter Termination in Denmark.
- Antibiotic Resistance : Implications for Global Health and Novel Intervention Strategies : Workshop Summary. National Academies Press, Washington, DC
- Emborg, H, Ersboll, AK, Heuer, OE, Wegener, HC (2001) The effect of discontinuing the use of antimicrobial growth promoters on the productivity in the Danish broiler production. Prev Vet Med 50: pp. 53-70 CrossRef
- Wierup, M (2001) The Swedish experience of the 1986 year ban of antimicrobial growth promoters, with special reference to animal health, disease prevention, productivity, and usage of antimicrobials. Microb Drug Resist 7: pp. 183-190 CrossRef
- The Swedish Model of Animal Production.
- Korea Phases Out Antibiotic Usage in Compound Feed.
- Russia Lifts Import Bans on U.S. Pork.
- Market Opportunities for Key U.S. Products in Russia.
- Hvistendahl, M (2012) China Takes Aim at Rampant Antibiotic Resistance. Science 336: pp. 795 CrossRef
- Kan, SA, Morrison, WM (2013) U.S.-Taiwan Relationship: Overview of Policy Issues. Congressional Research Service, Washington, DC
- Johnson, R, Becker, GS (2010) U.S.-Russia Meat and Poultry Trade Issues. Congressional Research Service, Washington, DC
- Barry, E (2012) Russia Announces Barriers on Imports of U.S. Meat.
- About Codex.
- Code of Practice to Minimize and Contain Antimicrobial Resistance.
- Silbergeld, EK, Graham, J, Price, LB (2008) Industrial food animal production, antimicrobial resistance, and human health. Annu Rev Public Health 29: pp. 151-169 CrossRef
- Restrictions on antimicrobial use in food animal production: an international regulatory and economic survey
- Open Access
- Available under Open Access This content is freely available online to anyone, anywhere at any time.
Globalization and Health
- Online Date
- October 2013
- Online ISSN
- BioMed Central
- Additional Links
- Drug resistance
- Food animal
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Johns Hopkins Center for a Livable Future, Johns Hopkins University, 615 North Wolfe Street, Suite W7010, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA
- 2. Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, 615 North Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA
- 3. Department of Health Policy and Management, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, 624 North Broadway, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA