The effect of acetaminophen (four grams a day for three consecutive days) on hepatic tests in alcoholic patients – a multicenter randomized study
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Hepatic failure has been associated with reported therapeutic use of acetaminophen by alcoholic patients. The highest risk period for alcoholic patients is immediately after discontinuation of alcohol intake. This period exhibits the largest increase in CYP2E1 induction and lowest glutathione levels. Our hypothesis was that common liver tests would be unaffected by administration of the maximum recommended daily dosage of acetaminophen for 3 consecutive days to newly-abstinent alcoholic subjects.
Adult alcoholic subjects entering two alcohol detoxification centers were enrolled in a prospective double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Subjects were randomized to acetaminophen, 4 g/day, or placebo for 3 consecutive days. The study had 95% probability of detecting a 15 IU/L difference in serum ALT.
A total of 443 subjects were enrolled: 308 (258 completed) received acetaminophen and 135 subjects (114 completed) received placebo. Study groups did not differ in demographics, alcohol consumption, nutritional status or baseline laboratory assessments. The peak mean ALT activity was 57 ± 45 IU/L and 55 ± 48 IU/L in the acetaminophen and placebo groups, respectively. Subgroup analyses for subjects presenting with an elevated ALT, subjects fulfilling a diagnosis of alcoholic hepatitis and subjects attaining a peak ALT greater than 200 IU/L showed no statistical difference between the acetaminophen and control groups. The one participant developing an increased international normalized ratio was in the placebo group.
Alcoholic patients treated with the maximum recommended daily dose of acetaminophen for 3 consecutive days did not develop increases in serum transaminase or other measures of liver injury. Treatment of pain or fever for 3 days with acetaminophen appears safe in newly-abstinent alcoholic patients, such as those presenting for acute medical care.
List of Abbreviations
analysis of variance
β-human chorionic gonadotropin
Body Mass Index
Comprehensive Addictions Rehabilitation and Evaluation Services
complete blood count
Food and Drug Administration
gamma glutamyl transferase
glutathione reduced form
International normalized ratio
Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs
over the counter
Recovery Centers of King County
upper limit of normal.
Acetaminophen (paracetamol) is a safe and effective over-the-counter (OTC) analgesic and antipyretic that has been used clinically for over 50 years. It is widely considered an appropriate first-line treatment for patients with fever, as well as for a variety of conditions causing mild to moderate pain.
Acetaminophen is used by over 50 million adults in the United States each week . Reports of hepatic failure and death following the intended therapeutic use of acetaminophen by patients who consume alcohol have been published. Some practitioners recommend that the maximum dose of acetaminophen be lowered from the current dose of 4 g/day or that acetaminophen be avoided completely in alcoholic patients. As acetaminophen is used without injury by a large number of people with a history of alcohol ingestion, the apparent overall risk appears low. A systematic review of acetaminophen use in alcoholic subjects concluded that there was little credible evidence implicating therapeutic doses of acetaminophen as a cause for fulminant hepatotoxicity in alcoholics . Nevertheless, the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) requires that the labels of non-prescription analgesic drugs, including acetaminophen products, warn patients who consume more than three alcoholic drinks daily to discuss the use of acetaminophen with their doctor.
The principal determinant of acetaminophen-induced liver injury is believed to be the reactive metabolite, N-acetyl-p-benzoquinoneimine (NAPQI), produced primarily by CYP2E1-mediated oxidation of acetaminophen. The primary defense against the toxic actions of this metabolite is the hepatic store of reduced glutathione (GSH). Plasma GSH concentrations are thought to provide a reasonable surrogate assessment of hepatic GSH stores . Published data suggest that that the plasma GSH concentration is decreased in alcoholic subjects , particularly in those ingesting acetaminophen .
Previous research has shown that a 2-day course of acetaminophen in subjects with chronic alcoholism did not cause changes in aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), bilirubin or international normalized ratio (INR). It has been proposed that the 2-day course of treatment was of insufficient duration to induce hepatic injury [6–9]. The purpose of this study was twofold: (1) to determine if a 3-day course of acetaminophen dose (4.0 g/day) affects the serum ALT, AST or INR, and (2) to determine if the plasma concentration of reduced glutathione is affected by this acetaminophen dosing regimen.
A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial of alcoholic subjects 18 years or older, admitted to the Denver Health Comprehensive Addictions Rehabilitation and Evaluation Services (CARES) in Denver, CO, USA or Recovery Centers of King County (RCKC) in Seattle, WA, USA from January 2002 through July 2004 was conducted. The study consisted of 3 consecutive days of study drug dosing followed by 2 days of observation with continuous monitoring for the 5-day period.
Participants were eligible for enrollment if they had a detectable breath ethanol concentration at admission to the detoxification facility. Exclusion criteria included a baseline serum AST or ALT above 200 IU/L, baseline INR above 1.5, baseline serum acetaminophen concentration above 20 mcg/mL, a history of ingesting more than 4 g/day of acetaminophen for any of the 4 days preceding enrollment, a history of allergy to acetaminophen, enrollment in any other trial within the preceding 3 months, or a positive serum pregnancy test.
A structured history and physical was used to assess medication and alcohol use as well as nutritional status. Formal screening for alcoholism included the CAGE questionnaire and the Brief Michigan Alcoholism Screening Test (MAST) [10–13]. Nonprescription and prescription medication use was documented with specific questioning about ingestion of substances that bind to, induce or inhibit CYP2E1 (e.g. isoniazid, chlorzoxazone, disulfiram). Study investigators clinically classified each participant into one of the following categories: normal nutritional status, mild malnutrition, or severe malnutrition . Body mass index (BMI kg/m2) was calculated.
The study was approved by the institutional review boards governing the institutions involved, namely the Colorado Multiple Institutional Review Board (COMIRB) for CARES and the Western Institutional Review Board (WIRB) for RCKC. Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects after they were documented to have nondetectable breath ethanol levels. Each subject received $10.00 per day.
Each eligible participant was randomized to receive either acetaminophen or placebo at a 2:1 ratio. An investigator not involved with participant management generated the randomization codes for each site using statistical software (StatMate version 1.011; GraphPad Software Inc, San Diego, CA, USA). Group assignments were blinded for participants, staff and investigators.
Acetaminophen was purchased from a retail store (Extra Strength Tylenol® tablets, 500 mg per caplet; McNeil Consumer and Specialty Pharmaceuticals, Fort Washington, PA, USA). Placebo capsules contained granulated sugar. To maintain blinding, placebo and acetaminophen doses were placed in identical pill casings and stored in uniquely coded individual bags by study personnel not involved in evaluation or management of subjects.
Participant flow and follow up
Baseline blood specimens were drawn in the morning prior to administration of study medication and each morning of study days 2 through 5 in order to avoid the effects of diurnal variation. Baseline testing included serum acetaminophen level, complete blood cell count (CBC), serum electrolytes with renal function tests, hepatic panel (AST, ALT, and bilirubin), INR, γ-glutamyl transferase (GGT) and, in female subjects, serum β-human chorionic gonadotropin (β-HCG). Hepatic panel and INR testing were performed on days 2 to 4 of the study. Serum acetaminophen level was repeated on day 3. Laboratory testing on day 5 was similar to baseline without GGT testing. Specimens from CARES were assayed in the clinical laboratory of Denver Health Medical Center (Denver, CO, USA). Specimens from RCKC were assayed at Dynacare Laboratories or Quest Diagnostics (Seattle, WA, USA). Breath ethanol levels were determined at initial presentation to the treatment center, usually in the evening or early morning before enrollment and prior to the first administration of study medication. Measurement of plasma GSH at baseline and again on study day 3 was completed in a subset of consecutive participants at CARES. This assay was performed at The Clinical Pharmacokinetic Laboratory of the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center in Seattle, WA. A sample handling protocol was used in obtaining and processing these samples to limit pre-analytical variability.
Subjects who left the detoxification center during the study were withdrawn from the trial. Study medications, 2 × 500 mg acetaminophen capsules or 2 × placebo capsules, were dispensed by nursing staff or study investigators who directly verified and recorded the time of ingestion. At CARES, the dosing schedule was 09:00, 13:00, 17:00 and 23:00. At RCKC, the dosing schedule was 08:30, 12:30, 16:30 and 20:30 for the first eight participants and then 08:00, 12:00, 16:00, and 20:00 for the remaining participants.
The study physician was notified of any subject who developed an ALT or AST level > 200 IU/L. The blind was broken for these subjects to assist the study physician in making treatment decisions. A total of 10 participants (8 acetaminophen, 2 placebo) were unblinded in this manner. No participant suffered acetaminophen-related liver injury.
The primary outcome of interest was a change in the serum ALT activity or the INR. Secondary outcomes were the serum bilirubin and the plasma glutathione concentrations. Demographic and clinical laboratory data for all subjects in the two study groups were compared using a statistical software package (SPSS Inc, Chicago IL, USA). Chi-Square or exact tests were used to compare categorical data such as gender and ethnicity, while an unpaired Student t test or analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare continuous numerical data such as age and most laboratory findings. Repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare continuous numerical data (i.e. ALT, AST) within groups from greater than three time points. In all analyses, a two-sided p value < 0.05 was considered significant.
Of the 509 subjects screened for eligibility, 66 were excluded prior to receiving study medication (Figure 1). Of these 66 excluded subjects, 24 were due to baseline serum AST or ALT > 200 IU/L, 16 presented to the facility with nondetectable breath ethanol, 15 requested to be withdrawn, 1 had a baseline INR greater than 1.5, 2 were removed due to protocol violations, and 8 because the nursing staff determined that the facility could not accommodate these subjects, usually for behavioral reasons.
The remaining 443 participants were randomized: 308 subjects were assigned to receive acetaminophen and 135 subjects were assigned to receive placebo. After randomization, 50 subjects withdrew from the acetaminophen group and 21 from the placebo group (Figure 1). Five participants withdrew due to adverse events unrelated to the study medication: 2 in the acetaminophen group (both from alcohol withdrawal symptoms) and 3 in the placebo group (1 from frostbite, 1 from alcohol withdrawal symptoms, 1 from abdominal pain). The remaining subjects (48 in the acetaminophen group, 18 in the placebo group) withdrew from the study because they did not want to remain in the treatment facility. Withdrawal rates were 16% for both the acetaminophen and placebo groups (p > 0.05).
Study groups were of similar demographic and baseline characteristics, including baseline serum AST, ALT, INR, and bilirubin (Table 1). Minority ethnic groups were well represented. More than 80% of study participants reported their most recent drinking episode lasting more than 1 week (Table 1). Baseline characteristics of patients in acetaminophen and placebo groups Acetaminophen group (n = 308) Placebo group (n = 135) p-value* Age: Mean ± SD 43 ± 9 44 ± 8 0.399 Range 18–72 20–65 Male (%) 284 (92) 128 (95) 0.322 Ethnic Origin (%): Caucasian 156 (51) 68 (50) 0.830 Hispanic 45 (15) 22 (16) African Descent 49 (16) 16 (12) Native American 43 (14) 23 (17) Other 15 (5) 6 (4) Body Mass Index: Mean ± SD 25 ± 5 25 ± 4 Range 15–55 17–39 Breath alcohol level at presentation to detoxification site: 0.711 Mean ± SD 0.161 ± 0.093 0.157 ± 0.099 Range 0.001–0.710 0.001–0.550 Self-reported alcoholic (%) 301 (98) 133 (99) 0.729 Duration of most recent drinking binge: < 1 week 56 (18) 22 (16) 0.193 1–4 weeks 98 (32) 36 (27) > 1 month 154 (50) 76 (56) Not reported 0 (0) 1 (1) CAGE (no. of yes answers; mean ± SD) 3.3 ± 0.9 3.3 ± 0.9 0.645 Alanine aminotransferase: mg/dL 49 ± 38 47 ± 37 0.398 Range 4–189 8–175 Aspartate aminotransferase: IU/L 55 ± 39 55 ± 38 0.650 Range 6–198 12–194 International normalized ratio: 0.652 INR 0.96 ± 0.09 0.96 ± 0.09 Range 0.79–1.40 0.80–1.30 Albumin: 0.589 g/dl 3.94 ± 0.45 3.93 ± 0.37 Range 2.1–4.8 2.8–4.0 Total bilirubin: mg/dL 0.74 ± 0.53 0.68 ± 0.45 0.286 Range 0.1–4.1 0.1–2.8 Gamma glutamyl transferase: IU/L 161 ± 308 168 ± 274 0.799 Range 9.0–3492 12.0–1893
Baseline characteristics of patients in acetaminophen and placebo groups
Acetaminophen group (n = 308)
Placebo group (n = 135)
Mean ± SD
43 ± 9
44 ± 8
Ethnic Origin (%):
Body Mass Index:
Mean ± SD
25 ± 5
25 ± 4
Breath alcohol level at presentation to detoxification site:
Mean ± SD
0.161 ± 0.093
0.157 ± 0.099
Self-reported alcoholic (%)
Duration of most recent drinking binge:
< 1 week
> 1 month
CAGE (no. of yes answers; mean ± SD)
3.3 ± 0.9
3.3 ± 0.9
49 ± 38
47 ± 37
55 ± 39
55 ± 38
International normalized ratio:
0.96 ± 0.09
0.96 ± 0.09
3.94 ± 0.45
3.93 ± 0.37
0.74 ± 0.53
0.68 ± 0.45
Gamma glutamyl transferase:
161 ± 308
168 ± 274
Analyses of ALT and AST were highly concordant, so only ALT results are shown. The mean baseline serum ALT of the acetaminophen group was 49 ± 38 IU/L and 47 ± 37 IU/L in the placebo group. Both the acetaminophen and placebo groups experienced statistically significant variation in the serum ALT during their course; however, there was no difference between the two groups at any point (Table 2). For both groups, the highest mean ALT occurred on day 5. The study had 95% probability of detecting a mean difference in the serum ALT of 15 IU/L. There was no significant change in mean INR, total bilirubin, or any other laboratory analysis between the study groups throughout the study (p > 0.05). Serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) measures (intent to treat analysis) Serum ALT (IU/L) Acetaminophen group Placebo Group p-value* Day 0: Mean ± SD 49 ± 38 47 ± 37 0.398 Range 4–189 8–175 n 308 135 Day 2: Mean ± SD 45 ± 38 46 ± 34 0.949 Range 7–292 6–174 n 287 124 Day 3: Mean ± SD 45 ± 36 50 ± 38 0.245 Range 7–230 6–242 n 274 118 Day 4: Mean ± SD 48 ± 39 52 ± 43 0.411 Range 6–264 8–288 n 267 115 Day 5: Mean ± SD 57 ± 45 55 ± 48 0.706 Range 7–312 7–282 n 261 114
Serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) measures (intent to treat analysis)
Serum ALT (IU/L)
Mean ± SD
49 ± 38
47 ± 37
Mean ± SD
45 ± 38
46 ± 34
Mean ± SD
45 ± 36
50 ± 38
Mean ± SD
48 ± 39
52 ± 43
Mean ± SD
57 ± 45
55 ± 48
A series of post-hoc analyses were performed to explore the possibility that a subgroup of participants could have had a different response to acetaminophen administration (i.e. that a susceptible subpopulation exists). None of the analyses indicated a statistical difference between the acetaminophen and placebo groups, although some analyses had few subjects and limited power to detect a difference. The ALT stayed the same or decreased from baseline in 31% of subjects in the placebo group and 36% of subjects in the acetaminophen group. The ALT increased above baseline in 66% of participants with a maximum increase of 1–254 IU/L in the acetaminophen group and 1–158 IU/L in the placebo group. A total of 32 participants (24 acetaminophen, 8 placebo) developed an ALT greater than three times the upper limit of normal (ULN) at some point during the course of the study (Figure 2). A total of 11 subjects developed an ALT greater than 200 IU/L at some time during the study (9 acetaminophen, 2 placebo). The maximum ALT and AST measures were 312 and 448 IU/L, respectively. One subject developed coagulopathy; this subject was in the placebo group and had an INR of 1.8 on day 3. A bilirubin that exceeded the upper limit of normal at any time was found in 20 (6.4%) in the acetaminophen group and 6 (4.4%) in the placebo group.
There were 156 participants (106 acetaminophen, 50 placebo) that entered the study with a serum ALT above the ULN. The ALT group means of those with a baseline ALT greater than the ULN were consistently two to three times higher throughout the trial, regardless of group assignment (Figure 3).
To assess the effect of acetaminophen administration on participants fulfilling a case definition of alcoholic liver disease, a post-hoc analysis was performed using the 44 subjects in whom the baseline AST/ALT ratio was 2.0 or greater . The mean ALT of the group without evidence of alcoholic liver disease was significantly higher throughout the trial than the group with evidence of alcoholic liver disease; however, the acetaminophen and placebo groups were not statistically different (Figure 4). The peak ALT measure of these 44 subjects was 75 IU/L compared to 312 IU/L for the entire study sample. No subject with an AST to ALT ratio of 2.0 or greater developed an ALT more than three times the ULN or reported any study-related adverse events.
Plasma reduced glutathione concentration was determined at baseline and on day 3 in a subset of 79 consecutive participants (56 acetaminophen, 23 placebo). Plasma glutathione increased from 2.17 ± 0.97 to 2.27 ± 0.85 μM in the acetaminophen group and from 1.90 ± 0.68 to 2.02 ± 0.74 μM in the placebo group. There was no difference between treatment or placebo groups (p > 0.05). The correlation between plasma GSH concentration and ALT, AST or INR was not significant (p > 0.05).
The role of nutritional status was explored. Neither body mass index nor any degree of malnutrition correlated with increases in ALT. There were eight serious adverse events experienced by five patients: one infection with methicillin resistant staphylococcus, one abdominal pain, three patients who developed delirium tremens, two patients developed confusion and one patient developed ataxia. These events were deemed serious because they resulted in hospitalization of the patient. One event was possibly related to the study medication. This patient experienced abdominal pain after receiving three doses of placebo.
The administration of acetaminophen 4 g/day for 3 consecutive days to newly-abstinent chronic alcoholic subjects did not result in a change in serum ALT, AST, bilirubin, or INR. Our study had 95% power to detect a 15 IU/L change in AST or ALT, a smaller change than is typically used by common definitions of liver injury .
This study was designed to safely maximize the opportunity to detect a potential alcohol-acetaminophen interaction. Participants had been drinking alcohol for a prolonged period and abruptly discontinued alcohol intake upon presentation to the detoxification facility. This presentation reproduces the conditions commonly cited in reports of acetaminophen injury associated with therapeutic doses in the medical literature: namely, induction of CYP2E1 and concomitant depletion of glutathione [17–20].
Hepatic injury from acetaminophen is caused by the production of a reactive metabolite N-acetyl-p-benzoquinoneimine (NAPQI). Only a small percentage of acetaminophen is converted by CYP2E1 to NAPQI, which is normally detoxified by hepatic glutathione (GSH). If GSH stores are depleted, NAPQI can bind to hepatocellular components resulting in liver injury. Conditions which can increase NAPQI production, such as induction of CYP2E1 by alcohol, or conditions that decrease GSH stores, such as malnutrition, are postulated to increase the risk of acetaminophen-induced hepatic injury [5, 17, 19–24]. Human studies have demonstrated that chronic alcohol exposure can increase CYP2E1 activity, up to approximately twice baseline . Increased CYP2E1 activity begins immediately upon exposure to ethanol . Following cessation of chronic alcohol exposure, human studies have also demonstrated that CYP2E1 induction is transient, lasting at most a few days . Animal and human data suggest that different mechanisms can contribute, to different degrees and at different ethanol concentrations, to increasing CYP2E1 activity [8, 9, 26, 27].
The alcohol-induced induction of CYP2E1 wanes following alcohol abstinence with a half-life of approximately 2.5 days and CYP2E1 activity reaching normal in 3 to 8 days [12, 25, 28]. Our subjects were treated with acetaminophen in a period of probable CYP2E1 induction and potentially reduced plasma glutathione concentration, recreating the conditions postulated to allow liver injury in acetaminophen-treated patients who ingest alcohol.
As it is possible that subjects who did not develop transaminase abnormalities secondary to acetaminophen could obscure a potential detrimental effect in a small sub-group, several post-hoc analyses were performed in an attempt to identify trends that would guide further study of alcoholic patients. The analyses included the subgroup of participants that presented with an initially elevated ALT or AST, participants meeting a common definition of alcoholic hepatitis, the relationship of body mass index to change of ALT and several others. These analyses are limited by the reduction in statistical power created by the reduced number of subjects present in a subgroup analysis. However, none of the analyses identified a group that responded to acetaminophen ingestion with an increase in serum ALT or AST, bilirubin concentration or INR.
The medical literature contains few prospective studies involving administration of acetaminophen to newly-abstinent alcoholic patients. Lauterburg found that plasma glutathione concentration was decreased in eight newly-abstinent alcoholic subjects and decreased further following a single supratherapeutic dose of acetaminophen (2 g) . As shown by the increase in glutathione in both experimental groups, our results suggest that the alcoholic patient has blood concentrations of glutathione that increase when alcohol ingestion is terminated. In contrast to the Lauterburg study, our subjects group receiving acetaminophen 1 g four times daily did not develop a decrease in the plasma concentration of glutathione.
Our results differ from Watkins et al, who reported that 31% to 44% of healthy young acetaminophen treated patients experienced an ALT greater than three times the upper limit of the normal range (3 × ULN) during treatment with the acetaminophen, 4 g/day for 14 days . In contrast only 6% of our patients developed an ALT greater than 3 × ULN after 3 days of treatment and the same rate was observed in the placebo group. There are several potential explanations for this difference. First, the subject groups are considerably different: young normal subjects vs older alcoholic subjects. Alcoholic subjects repeatedly insult their liver, which might decrease the response to another stimulus. Second, although daily ALT values were not provided in the Watkins manuscript, the author stated that "Elevation of ALT to more than three times the ULN (120 U/L) was not observed prior to day 3 in any of the treatment groups." Similarly, our results indicate that the proportion of patients with an ALT greater than 3 × ULN (some patients started with ALT > ULN) decreased on day 2 and then increased slightly on days 3, 4 and 5 (Figure 2). Although the increase in ALT also occurred in the control group, we cannot exclude that the serum ALT of our patients would not have followed a course similar to those reported in Watkins. Finally, previous randomized trials established previously that the serum aminotransferase activity increases in some patients during treatment with acetaminophen, however, none of those studies determined ALT as frequently (daily) or as early in the course as Watkins . The meaning of asymptomatic increases in serum ALT is unknown. Further research with administration for longer periods in alcoholic patients is needed to answer these questions.
Previous research by our group involving administration of acetaminophen to alcoholic subjects for 2 days supports the findings of the current study [31, 32]. Therapeutic acetaminophen dosing in a total of 132 subjects showed no effect on serum ALT, AST, bilirubin or INR. Recently, Bartels et al studied the administration of acetaminophen for 4 days. He also found no difference in serum glutathione S-transferase (GST), an indicator of hepatocyte enzyme release similar to ALT and AST . Although they are few, all prospective studies in alcoholic subjects to date have failed to find liver injury associated with therapeutic doses of acetaminophen.
There are limitations to the generalizability of our results. We only studied the maximal recommended daily dose of acetaminophen (4.0 g/day), so our data should not be extrapolated to either intentional or unintentional overdoses. Larson et al reported on patients entered into the Acute Liver Failure registry . Among patients with liver injury thought to be acetaminophen-related, referred to a liver service participating in the registry and fulfilling the diagnosis of acute liver failure, 51% reported therapeutic intent and 63% reported use of an acetaminophen-opioid combination drug. Most patients ingested an overdosage of acetaminophen with a mean dosage of 7.5 g/day (range 1–78 g/day). It is crucial to distinguish between ingestion of a true therapeutic dose and ingestion of an overdose despite therapeutic intent.
Our results do not apply to all alcoholic patients. By including subjects with higher aminotransferase levels than previously studied, we were able to enroll more than 95% of alcoholic volunteers screened. However, we did not study patients with decompensated alcoholic liver disease. Our results might therefore not apply to patients with liver disease severe enough to impair hepatic synthetic function.
We evaluated a 3-day course of acetaminophen therapy. As cytochrome induction wanes substantially in the first 2 days, an alcoholic patient would be expected to be at highest risk during the first day following cessation of alcohol intake. We did not study alcoholic patients that continued to ingest alcohol concurrently with acetaminophen. However, acute ingestion of alcohol inhibits rather than increases NAPQI formation, so it is unlikely that acute alcohol consumption would increase the susceptibility of alcoholic patients to liver injury [2, 21, 24, 34]. The metabolism of acetaminophen produces a protein adduct of acetaminophen composed of a cysteine residue covalently bound to acetaminophen. In the future, this assay could allow quantitation of the amount of acetaminophen actually metabolized by a patient and allow stratification and analysis of the risk of hepatotoxicity in patients receiving acetaminophen [35, 36].
Claims of a potential acetaminophen-alcohol interaction have prompted some healthcare providers to recommend a decreased dose or complete avoidance of acetaminophen for patients who drink alcohol. If patients who drink alcohol are instructed to avoid acetaminophen altogether, they will likely use other OTC analgesics such as aspirin or other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory medications (NSAIDs). NSAIDs and aspirin cause significant morbidity and mortality at or near the therapeutic dosage. Precise data are not available, but it is estimated that 100,000 Americans are hospitalized and 16,000 patients die each year in the United States from gastrointestinal hemorrhage, ulcers and perforations secondary to NSAIDs and aspirin [15, 20, 35, 37]. The FDA has recognized the significance of this risk and since 1998 has mandated that OTC NSAIDs such as ibuprofen and naproxen sodium carry an alcohol warning.
The alcohol warning on all common OTC analgesics advises people who consume three or more alcoholic drinks every day to consult a doctor before using these drugs. Healthcare providers are commonly faced with the question of which OTC analgesic is the safest for patients who occasionally drink alcohol as well as for those patients who are suspected or confirmed alcoholics. The answer to this question requires an assessment of the risks of each analgesic. A recent study suggested that NSAID treatment produces a tenfold increase in risk of gastrointestinal bleeding for patients within 1 week of initiating therapy . Although we did not directly compare the safety of NSAIDS to acetaminophen, we were unable to find any evidence of liver injury in "high risk" subjects ingesting acetaminophen. Acetaminophen is present in many OTC products. Inadvertent concurrent use of these products could exceed the maximum recommended dosage of 4 g/day. The relative susceptibility of alcoholic patients and other patients in doses above 4 g/day is unclear.
Overall, treatment of pain or fever for 3 days with acetaminophen appears safe in newly-abstinent alcoholic patients, such as those presenting for acute medical care. This study and other prospective data suggest that short-term maximal therapeutic acetaminophen dosing does not cause liver injury in alcoholics.
Funding for this study was provided by McNeil Consumer Healthcare to the Denver Health Authority, Denver, Colorado. The study was investigator initiated – the company did not have a role in conceiving, designing or executing the project, including data collection, analysis or interpretation. The company was allowed to review the initial draft of the manuscript to assure that no confidential proprietary information was released. The authors received no compensation outside of normal salary for work performed on this project.